Literature DB >> 21926908

Cultural adaptation and validation of the painDETECT scale into Spanish.

Jose De Andrés1, Juan Pérez-Cajaraville, Maria Dolores Lopez-Alarcón, Jose Manuel López-Millán, Cesar Margarit, Maria Dolores Rodrigo-Royo, Maria Luisa Franco-Gay, David Abejón, Miguel Angel Ruiz, Vanessa López-Gomez, María Pérez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to culturally adapt into Spanish and validate the painDETECT questionnaire, a brief self-administered instrument designed to screen the presence of a neuropathic pain component in usual clinical practice.
METHODS: The original English painDETECT questionnaire was culturally adapted into Spanish (Spain) by 2 independent translators under supervision of an expert panel. The LANNS, and a pain visual analog scale were administered along with the painDETECT questionnaire to a sample of 252 patients with neuropathic, nociceptive, or mixed pain for at least 3 months. Patients were classified by experienced specialists under normal conditions of clinical practice. A retest measure after 24 to 48 hours was also carried out. Reliability, construct validity, convergent validity, criterion, and discriminant validity were assessed.
RESULTS: An effective sample of 221 patients with chronic pain was recruited, 32% diagnosed of neuropathic origin, 32% of nociceptive, and remaining 36% presented mixed pain. The average age was 57.8 years (SD=14.2) and 59% were women. Cronbach alpha attained a value of 0.86, and the intraclass correlation coefficient with the retest was 0.93. The factor structure was coherent with the one informed for the original instrument. Pearson correlation with the LANSS scale was 0.88. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.88 when comparing neuropathic and nociceptive groups. Using the suggested cutoff value for pain presence of 19 points or higher, the following discriminant values are obtained: sensitivity=75%, specificity=84%, Youden Index=0.595, positive predictive value=92%, and negative predictive value=60%. The absence cutoff value of 12 points or bellow raised the following values: sensitivity=93%, specificity=68%, Youden Index=0.61, positive predictive value=87%, and negative predictive value=80%. When mixed pain patients are included in the group with a neuropathic component, discriminant values are slightly reduced, as expected.
CONCLUSIONS: The culturally adapted version of the painDETECT presents good psychometric properties and shows to be a valid patient-reported outcome for measuring the presence of a neuropathic component in patients with chronic pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21926908     DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31822bb35b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  22 in total

1.  Challenges in using Symptoms Based Screening Tools while Assessing Neuropathic Pain Component in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Kapil Gudala; Babita Ghai; Dipika Bansal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-05-01

2.  Validity and Reliability of a Novel Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) in Quantifying and Monitoring Corneal and Ocular Surface Pain.

Authors:  Yureeda Qazi; Shelley Hurwitz; Sarosh Khan; Ula V Jurkunas; Reza Dana; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Evaluation of quality of life and neuropathic pain in patients with low back pain using the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire.

Authors:  Akihiko Hiyama; Masahiko Watanabe; Hiroyuki Katoh; Masato Sato; Daisuke Sakai; Joji Mochida
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  "Prevalence of chronic pain following resection of pelvic bone tumours: A single centre prospective observational survey".

Authors:  Sumitra Bakshi; Meenal Rana; Ashish Gulia; Ajay Puri; Tadala Ss Harsha; Shashank Tiwari; Aparna Gotur
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2021-09-27

5.  A PROMIS Measure of Neuropathic Pain Quality.

Authors:  Robert L Askew; Karon F Cook; Francis J Keefe; Cindy J Nowinski; David Cella; Dennis A Revicki; Esi M Morgan DeWitt; Kaleb Michaud; Dace L Trence; Dagmar Amtmann
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  A cross-sectional study examining the psychometric properties of the painDETECT measure in neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Joseph C Cappelleri; Vijaya Koduru; E Jay Bienen; Alesia Sadosky
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.133

7.  Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the painDETECT questionnaire: a multicenter observational study.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Matsubayashi; Katsushi Takeshita; Masahiko Sumitani; Yasushi Oshima; Juichi Tonosu; So Kato; Junichi Ohya; Takeshi Oichi; Naoki Okamoto; Sakae Tanaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Measurement properties of painDETECT by average pain severity.

Authors:  Joseph C Cappelleri; E Jay Bienen; Vijaya Koduru; Alesia Sadosky
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2014-11-06

9.  The Modified painDETECT Questionnaire for Patients with Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis: Translation into Dutch, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Reliability Assessment.

Authors:  Wietske Rienstra; Tim Blikman; Frans B Mensink; Jos J A M van Raay; Baukje Dijkstra; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Martin Stevens; Inge van den Akker-Scheek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Role of the endocannabinoid system in the emotional manifestations of osteoarthritis pain.

Authors:  Carmen La Porta; S Andreea Bura; Jone Llorente-Onaindia; Antoni Pastor; Francisco Navarrete; María Salud García-Gutiérrez; Rafael De la Torre; Jorge Manzanares; Jordi Monfort; Rafael Maldonado
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 7.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.