OBJECTIVE: Families and other surrogate decisionmakers for chronically critically ill patients often lack information about patient prognosis or options for care. This study describes an approach to develop and validate a printed information brochure about chronic critical illness aimed at improving comprehension of the disease process and outcomes for patients' families and other surrogate decisionmakers. DESIGN: Investigators reviewed existing literature to identify key domains of informational needs. Content of these domains was incorporated in a draft brochure that included graphics and a glossary of terms. Clinical sensibility, balance, and emotional sensitivity of the draft brochure were tested in a series of evaluations by cohorts of experienced clinicians (n = 49) and clinical content experts (n = 8) with revisions after each review. SUBJECTS: Cognitive testing of the brochure was performed through interviews of ten representative family members of chronically critically ill patients with quantitative and qualitative analysis of responses. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical sensibility and balance were rated in the two most favorable categories on a five-point scale by more than two thirds of clinicians and content experts. After review, family members described the brochure as clear and readable and recommended that the brochure be delivered to family members by clinicians followed by a discussion of its contents. They indicated that the glossary was useful and recommended supplementation by additional lists of local resources. After reading the brochure, their prognostic estimates became more consistent with actual outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed and validated a printed information brochure that may improve family comprehension of chronic critical illness and its outcomes. The structured process that is described can serve as a template for the development of other information aids for use with seriously ill populations.
OBJECTIVE: Families and other surrogate decisionmakers for chronically critically ill patients often lack information about patient prognosis or options for care. This study describes an approach to develop and validate a printed information brochure about chronic critical illness aimed at improving comprehension of the disease process and outcomes for patients' families and other surrogate decisionmakers. DESIGN: Investigators reviewed existing literature to identify key domains of informational needs. Content of these domains was incorporated in a draft brochure that included graphics and a glossary of terms. Clinical sensibility, balance, and emotional sensitivity of the draft brochure were tested in a series of evaluations by cohorts of experienced clinicians (n = 49) and clinical content experts (n = 8) with revisions after each review. SUBJECTS: Cognitive testing of the brochure was performed through interviews of ten representative family members of chronically critically ill patients with quantitative and qualitative analysis of responses. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical sensibility and balance were rated in the two most favorable categories on a five-point scale by more than two thirds of clinicians and content experts. After review, family members described the brochure as clear and readable and recommended that the brochure be delivered to family members by clinicians followed by a discussion of its contents. They indicated that the glossary was useful and recommended supplementation by additional lists of local resources. After reading the brochure, their prognostic estimates became more consistent with actual outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed and validated a printed information brochure that may improve family comprehension of chronic critical illness and its outcomes. The structured process that is described can serve as a template for the development of other information aids for use with seriously ill populations.
Authors: Renee D Stapleton; Ruth A Engelberg; Marjorie D Wenrich; Christopher H Goss; J Randall Curtis Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Judith E Nelson; Alice F Mercado; Sharon L Camhi; Nidhi Tandon; Sylvan Wallenstein; Gary I August; R Sean Morrison Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-12-10
Authors: Lingsheng Li; Judith E Nelson; Laura C Hanson; Christopher E Cox; Shannon S Carson; Emily J Chai; Kristine L Keller; James A Tulsky; Marion Danis Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Judith E Nelson; Laura C Hanson; Kristine L Keller; Shannon S Carson; Christopher E Cox; James A Tulsky; Douglas B White; Emily J Chai; Stefanie P Weiss; Marion Danis Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Shannon S Carson; Christopher E Cox; Sylvan Wallenstein; Laura C Hanson; Marion Danis; James A Tulsky; Emily Chai; Judith E Nelson Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-07-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jeffrey D Edwards; Howard B Panitch; Maureen George; Anne-Marie Cirrilla; Eli Grunstein; Joanne Wolfe; Judith E Nelson; Rachel L Miller Journal: Pediatr Pulmonol Date: 2020-12-23