Literature DB >> 21926598

The Eldicus prospective, observational study of triage decision making in European intensive care units: part I--European Intensive Care Admission Triage Scores.

Charles L Sprung1, Mario Baras, Gaetano Iapichino, Jozef Kesecioglu, Anne Lippert, Chris Hargreaves, Angelo Pezzi, Romain Pirracchio, David L Edbrooke, Antonio Pesenti, Jan Bakker, Gabriel Gurman, Simon L Cohen, Joergen Wiis, Didier Payen, Antonio Artigas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Life and death triage decisions are made daily by intensive care unit physicians. Scoring systems have been developed for prognosticating intensive care unit mortality but none for intensive care unit triage. The objective of this study was to develop an intensive care unit triage decision rule based on 28-day mortality rates of admitted and refused patients.
DESIGN: Prospective, observational study of triage decisions from September 2003 until March 2005.
SETTING: Eleven intensive care units in seven European countries. PATIENTS: All patients >18 yrs with a request for intensive care unit admission.
INTERVENTIONS: Admission or rejection to an intensive care unit.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical, laboratory, and physiological variables and data from severity scores were collected. Separate scores for accepted and rejected patients with 28-day mortality end point were built. Values for variables were grouped into categories determined by the locally weighted least squares graphical method applied to the logit of the mortality and by univariate logistic regressions for reducing candidates for the score. Multivariate logistic regression was used to construct the final score. Cutoff values for 99.5% specificity were determined. Of 6796 patients, 5602 were admitted and 1194 rejected. The initial refusal score included age, diagnosis, systolic blood pressure, pulse, respirations, creatinine, bilirubin, PaO2, bicarbonate, albumin, use of vasopressors, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Karnofsky Scale, operative status and chronic disorder, and the initial refusal receiver operating characteristics were area under the curve 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.76-0.79). The final triage score included age, diagnosis, creatinine, white blood cells, platelets, albumin, use of vasopressors, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Karnofsky Scale, operative status and chronic disorder, and the final score receiver operating characteristics were area under the curve 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.80-0.86). Patients with initial refusal scores >173.5 or final triage scores = 0 should be rejected.
CONCLUSIONS: The initial refusal score and final triage score provide objective data for rejecting patients that will die even if admitted to the intensive care unit and survive if refused intensive care unit admission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21926598     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822e5692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  23 in total

1.  Association between frailty and short- and long-term outcomes among critically ill patients: a multicentre prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sean M Bagshaw; H Thomas Stelfox; Robert C McDermid; Darryl B Rolfson; Ross T Tsuyuki; Nadia Baig; Barbara Artiuch; Quazi Ibrahim; Daniel E Stollery; Ella Rokosh; Sumit R Majumdar
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Optimal control of ICU patient discharge: from theory to implementation.

Authors:  Fermín Mallor; Cristina Azcárate; Julio Barado
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2015-03-13

3.  The new sepsis consensus definitions: the good, the bad and the ugly.

Authors:  Charles L Sprung; Roland M H Schein; Robert A Balk
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Eight things we would never do regarding end-of-life care in the ICU.

Authors:  E Wesley Ely; Elie Azoulay; Charles L Sprung
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Intermediate care to intensive care triage: A quality improvement project to reduce mortality.

Authors:  David N Hager; Pranav Chandrashekar; Robert W Bradsher; Ali M Abdel-Halim; Souvik Chatterjee; Melinda Sawyer; Roy G Brower; Dale M Needham
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.425

Review 6.  [Intensive care medicine in old age : The individual status is the determining factor].

Authors:  A Valentin
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 0.840

7.  The ETHICA study (part II): simulation study of determinants and variability of ICU physician decisions in patients aged 80 or over.

Authors:  M Garrouste-Orgeas; A Tabah; A Vesin; F Philippart; A Kpodji; C Bruel; C Grégoire; A Max; J F Timsit; B Misset
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Triage of intensive care patients: identifying agreement and controversy.

Authors:  Charles L Sprung; Marion Danis; Gaetano Iapichino; Antonio Artigas; Jozef Kesecioglu; Rui Moreno; Anne Lippert; J Randall Curtis; Paula Meale; Simon L Cohen; Mitchell M Levy; Robert D Truog
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Geographical variation in use of intensive care: a nationwide study.

Authors:  Anne Høy Seemann Vestergaard; Christian Fynbo Christiansen; Henrik Nielsen; Steffen Christensen; Søren Paaske Johnsen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Long-Term Mortality and Hospital Resource Use in ICU Patients With Alcohol-Related Liver Disease.

Authors:  Nazir I Lone; Robert Lee; Timothy S Walsh
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.