Literature DB >> 21926379

Splenic elasticity measured with real-time tissue elastography is a marker of portal hypertension.

Masashi Hirooka1, Hironori Ochi, Yohei Koizumi, Yoshiyasu Kisaka, Masanori Abe, Yoshio Ikeda, Bunzo Matsuura, Yoichi Hiasa, Morikazu Onji.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively correlate spleen elasticity and degree of portal hypertension estimated with the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and to evaluate splenic elasticity as a predictor of gastroesophageal varices.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this study, and patients provided written informed consent. In a pilot study of 60 patients with chronic liver damage, the authors measured liver and spleen elasticity with real-time tissue elastography (RTE), obtained serum markers related to fibrosis, examined hepatic and splenic blood flow with duplex Doppler ultrasonography, estimated HVPG, and performed upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Then, with use of thresholds determined in the pilot study, the authors conducted a validation trial with another 210 patients, performing all studies except the measurement of HPVG. The relationship between HVPG and the other parameters was analyzed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal varices were calculated by using cutoff values obtained from receiver operating characteristic curves.
RESULTS: Among the parameters associated with HVPG, correlation was closest with splenic elasticity (R = 0.854, P < .0001). When 8.24 was selected as the cutoff of splenic elasticity for predicting HVPG of more than 10 mm Hg, the accuracy of diagnosing gastroesophageal varix was 90% (sensitivity, 96%; specificity, 85%; PPV, 83%; NPV, 97%). The results of the validation trial showed that the 8.24 cutoff for splenic elasticity was associated with a diagnostic accuracy of 94.8% (sensitivity, 98%; specificity, 93.8%; PPV, 82.1%; NPV, 99.4%) for gastroesophageal varices.
CONCLUSION: Splenic elasticity determined with RTE is the most closely associated parameter for evaluating HVPG and is useful as a clinical marker of portal hypertension and a predictive marker of gastroesophageal varices. © RSNA, 2011.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21926379     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  20 in total

Review 1.  JSUM ultrasound elastography practice guidelines: liver.

Authors:  Masatoshi Kudo; Tsuyoshi Shiina; Fuminori Moriyasu; Hiroko Iijima; Ryosuke Tateishi; Norihisa Yada; Kenji Fujimoto; Hiroyasu Morikawa; Masashi Hirooka; Yasukiyo Sumino; Takashi Kumada
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  Noninvasive diagnostic method for idiopathic portal hypertension based on measurements of liver and spleen stiffness by ARFI elastography.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Furuichi; Fuminori Moriyasu; Junichi Taira; Katsutoshi Sugimoto; Takatomo Sano; Shigeki Ichimura; Yuki Miyata; Yasuharu Imai
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  Upregulated absorption of dietary palmitic acids with changes in intestinal transporters in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).

Authors:  Hiroki Utsunomiya; Yasunori Yamamoto; Eiji Takeshita; Yoshio Tokumoto; Fujimasa Tada; Teruki Miyake; Masashi Hirooka; Masanori Abe; Teru Kumagi; Bunzo Matsuura; Yoshio Ikeda; Yoichi Hiasa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 4.  Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for the management of acute variceal hemorrhage.

Authors:  Romaric Loffroy; Louis Estivalet; Violaine Cherblanc; Sylvain Favelier; Pierre Pottecher; Samia Hamza; Anne Minello; Patrick Hillon; Pierre Thouant; Pierre-Henri Lefevre; Denis Krausé; Jean-Pierre Cercueil
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Role of Spleen Stiffness Measurement by 2D-Shear Wave Elastography in Ruling Out the Presence of High-Risk Varices in Cirrhotic Patients.

Authors:  Dimitrios S Karagiannakis; Theodoros Voulgaris; Evgenia Koureta; Elissavet Chloupi; George V Papatheodoridis; John Vlachogiannakos
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  A Primer to the Diagnostic and Clinical Utility of Spleen Stiffness Measurement in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease.

Authors:  Andrea Mladenovic; Raj Vuppalanchi; Archita P Desai
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2022-01-28

Review 7.  Invasive and non-invasive techniques for detecting portal hypertension and predicting variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: a review.

Authors:  Enrico Maria Zardi; Francesco Maria Di Matteo; Claudio Maurizio Pacella; Arun J Sanyal
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 4.709

8.  Clinically severe portal hypertension: role of multi-detector row CT features in diagnosis.

Authors:  Ji Young Lee; Tae Yeob Kim; Woo Kyoung Jeong; Yongsoo Kim; Jinoo Kim; Kyoung Won Kim; Young Hwan Kim; Joo Hyun Sohn
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Assessment of portal hypertension and high-risk oesophageal varices with liver and spleen three-dimensional multifrequency MR elastography in liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Maxime Ronot; Simon Lambert; Laure Elkrief; Sabrina Doblas; Pierre-Emmanuel Rautou; Laurent Castera; Valérie Vilgrain; Ralph Sinkus; Bernard E Van Beers; Philippe Garteiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Using MR elastography to assess portal hypertension and response to beta-blockers in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  Karen Vagner Danielsen; Jens Dahlgaard Hove; Puria Nabilou; Meng Yin; Jun Chen; Mirabella Zhao; Thomas Kallemose; Ane Søgaard Teisner; Hartwig Roman Siebner; Richard L Ehman; Søren Møller; Flemming Bendtsen
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 8.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.