Literature DB >> 24723070

Clinically severe portal hypertension: role of multi-detector row CT features in diagnosis.

Ji Young Lee1, Tae Yeob Kim, Woo Kyoung Jeong, Yongsoo Kim, Jinoo Kim, Kyoung Won Kim, Young Hwan Kim, Joo Hyun Sohn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To explore the CT signs which permit estimation of clinically severe portal hypertension (PH) [≥ 12 of hepatic vein pressure gradient (HVPG)].
METHODS: One-hundred and seven consecutive patients who underwent HVPG measurement in the PH group and 52 controls were included. The diameters of main portal vein (øMPV), superior mesenteric vein (øSMV), splenic vein (øSV), and left gastric vein, øMPV/øSV, øSMV/øSV, as well as estimated spleen volumes were evaluated on the CT scan. The grade of varix and ascites were also evaluated semi-quantitatively. We explored the statistically significant CT features related to severe PH and performed a logistic regression analysis for an estimation model for severe PH.
RESULTS: øMPV/øSV and øSMV/øSV tended to gradually increase as the PH became severer, and the difference between severe and not severe groups was statistically significant (p = 0.015 and 0.038, respectively). According to the regression analysis, øSMV/øSV and the grade of esophageal varix and ascites were finally included as related variables for predicting severe PH. The odds ratio (OR) of øSMV/øSV was 4.596, and large esophageal varix (OR 4.135) and mild (OR 3.051) and large amount of ascites (OR 21.781) were statistically significantly related to severe PH.
CONCLUSION: Changing diameters of portal system, the grades of esophageal varices and ascites on multi-detector row computed tomography might be indicative features for clinically severe PH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24723070     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-014-3149-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  46 in total

Review 1.  EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 2.  Hemodynamic alterations in liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Giorgio La Villa; Paolo Gentilini
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2007-10-24

3.  Evaluation of esophageal varices on liver computed tomography: receiver operating characteristic analyses of the performance of radiologists and endoscopists.

Authors:  Hyojin Kim; Dongil Choi; Geum-Youn Gwak; Joon Hyoek Lee; Moon Kyung Park; Hyang Ie Lee; Seong Hyun Kim; Sangyu Nam; Eun Young Yoo; Young Soo Do
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 4.029

4.  Variation in hepatic segmental volume distribution according to different causes of liver cirrhosis: CT volumetric evaluation.

Authors:  In Kim; Yun-Jin Jang; Hunkyu Ryeom; So Mi Lee; Hui Joong Lee; Gab Chul Kim; Hye Jung Kim
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Hepatic vein arrival time as assessed by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is useful for the assessment of portal hypertension in compensated cirrhosis.

Authors:  Moon Young Kim; Ki Tae Suk; Soon Koo Baik; Hyoun A Kim; Young Ju Kim; Seung Hwan Cha; Hwa Ryun Kwak; Mee Yon Cho; Hong Jun Park; Hyo Keun Jeon; So Yeon Park; Bo Ra Kim; Jin Heon Hong; Ki Won Jo; Jae Woo Kim; Hyun Soo Kim; Sang Ok Kwon; Sei Jin Chang; Gwang Ho Baik; Dong Joon Kim
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 6.  Cirrhosis: CT and MR imaging evaluation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Brancatelli; Michael P Federle; Roberta Ambrosini; Roberto Lagalla; Alessandro Carriero; Massimo Midiri; Valérie Vilgrain
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Assessment of the severity of liver disease and fibrotic change: the usefulness of hepatic CT perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Hashimoto; Takamichi Murakami; Keizo Dono; Masatoshi Hori; Tonsok Kim; Masayuki Kudo; Shigeru Marubashi; Atsushi Miyamoto; Yutaka Takeda; Hiroaki Nagano; Koji Umeshita; Hironobu Nakamura; Morito Monden
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 8.  Role of spleen enlargement in cirrhosis with portal hypertension.

Authors:  M Bolognesi; C Merkel; D Sacerdoti; V Nava; A Gatta
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.088

9.  [Measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient in liver cirrhosis: relationship with the status of cirrhosis, varices, and ascites in Korea].

Authors:  Moon Young Kim; Soon Koo Baik; Ki Tae Suk; Change Jin Yea; Il Young Lee; Jae Woo Kim; Seung Hwan Cha; Young Ju Kim; Soon Ho Um; Kwang-Hyub Han
Journal:  Korean J Hepatol       Date:  2008-06

10.  Hepatic venous pressure gradient in cirrhosis: correlation with the size of varices, bleeding, ascites, and child's status.

Authors:  M Wadhawan; S Dubey; B C Sharma; S K Sarin; S K Sarin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.487

View more
  3 in total

1.  Computed Tomography Findings as a Novel Predictor of Alcohol-Associated Hepatitis Outcomes.

Authors:  Patricia P Bloom; Amirkasra Mojtahed; Emily D Bethea; Sally A Knooihuizen; Jin Choi; Jules L Dienstag; Raymond T Chung; Chin Hur
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Noninvasive imaging assessment of portal hypertension.

Authors:  Paul Kennedy; Octavia Bane; Stefanie J Hectors; Aaron Fischman; Thomas Schiano; Sara Lewis; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09-14

3.  Risk assessment of first upper gastrointestinal bleeding using computerized tomoscanning in esophageal varices patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

Authors:  Wei Xie; Fa-Xiang Chen; Li-Yao Zhu; Cheng-Cai Wen; Xin Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.889

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.