Literature DB >> 21925992

A comparison between direct PCR and extraction to generate DNA profiles from samples retrieved from various substrates.

Yuvaneswari Chandramoulee Swaran1, Lindsey Welch.   

Abstract

Direct PCR generates DNA profiles from samples without using the extraction process. During sample extraction, DNA may be lost due to the methods used, which can affect the quality of the DNA profile obtained. This is not the case with direct PCR, where the sample is transferred directly into the PCR tube. Here, we report on the ability of direct PCR to generate DNA profiles from low amounts of control DNA retrieved from various surfaces using PowerPlex 16 HS. A comparison is made with samples undergoing a preliminary extraction stage using QiaAmp DNA Micro kits. Samples subjected to direct PCR generated DNA profiles with higher peak heights and lower allele dropout on all the different substrates tested when compared to the samples subjected to extraction. The amount of DNA retrieved from each substrate also varied even though the same amount of starting material was deposited, proving that the type of substrate can affect the retrieval of DNA. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21925992     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  8 in total

1.  The detection of different Dirofilaria species using direct PCR technique.

Authors:  Katja Silbermayr; Barbara Eigner; Georg Gerhard Duscher; Anja Joachim; Hans-Peter Fuehrer
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  DNA profiles from fingernails using direct PCR.

Authors:  Renée Ottens; Duncan Taylor; Adrian Linacre
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.007

3.  DNA profiles from clothing fibers using direct PCR.

Authors:  Renée Blackie; Duncan Taylor; Adrian Linacre
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 2.007

4.  Determination of human identity from Anopheles stephensi mosquito blood meals using direct amplification and massively parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Shayna L Gray; Teresa M Tiedge; Joann M Butkus; Tyler J Earp; Scott E Lindner; Reena Roy
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 4.882

5.  Successful direct amplification of nuclear markers from a single hair follicle.

Authors:  Renée Ottens; Duncan Taylor; Damien Abarno; Adrian Linacre
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2012-12-30       Impact factor: 2.007

6.  DNA recovery after sequential processing of latent fingerprints on copy paper.

Authors:  Abigail S Bathrick; Sarah Norsworthy; Dane T Plaza; Mallory N McCormick; Donia Slack; Robert S Ramotowski
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 1.717

7.  Direct-to-PCR tissue preservation for DNA profiling.

Authors:  Amy Sorensen; Clare Berry; David Bruce; Michelle Elizabeth Gahan; Sheree Hughes-Stamm; Dennis McNevin
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  Characterization of degradation and heterozygote balance by simulation of the forensic DNA analysis process.

Authors:  Oskar Hansson; Thore Egeland; Peter Gill
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.686

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.