Literature DB >> 21925964

Sleeve gastrectomy as a bridge to a second bariatric procedure in superobese patients--a single institution experience.

Samrat Mukherjee1, Kalpana Devalia, Mehtab G Rahman, Kesava R Mannur.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment of superobese patients (body mass index ≥50 kg/m(2)) with significant co-morbidities remains a challenge. We evaluated our outcomes after initial laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in the superobese undergoing staged procedures in the setting of a university hospital in the United Kingdom.
METHODS: The data from patients with a body mass index of ≥50 kg/m(2) undergoing LSG as a part of a staged procedure from 2005 to 2008 were extracted from our database. The patient parameters were analyzed, along with the morbidity, length of stay, and weight loss after the initial procedure.
RESULTS: A total of 61 patients with a body mass index of ≥50 kg/m(2) (median 60, range 50-81.5) underwent LSG as a part of a staged procedure during the study period. The median age was 46 years (range 24-61.5), and 41 were women. Obesity-related co-morbidities were present in different combinations in 51 patients (83.6%). All the procedures were completed laparoscopically, barring 1. The median hospital stay was 4 days (interquartile range 3-4). Complications occurred in 6 patients (9.8%), and 3 required repeat laparoscopy for complications. No patient died. The median percentage of excess weight loss was 31% at 6 months (interquartile range 26-40) and 39% at 1 year (interquartile range 34-51). Diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea and hypertension had resolved in 90%, 100%, and 61% of the patients, respectively. Of the 61 patients, 41 went on to undergo a second-stage procedure, of whom 1 underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 5 underwent repeat LSG, and the rest underwent laparoscopic duodenal switch.
CONCLUSIONS: LSG is safe and effective for initial weight loss in the superobese undergoing 2-stage procedures. Copyright Â
© 2012 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21925964     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.04.232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  10 in total

1.  Do adverse childhood experiences affect surgical weight loss outcomes?

Authors:  Nayna A Lodhia; Ulysses S Rosas; Michelle Moore; Alan Glaseroff; Dan Azagury; Homero Rivas; John M Morton
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for super obese patients: a comparative study.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; François Pugin; Gilles Chassot; Francesco Volonte; Pascale Koutny-Fong; Monika E Hagen; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Laparoscopic gastric bypass vs. sleeve gastrectomy in the super obese patient: early outcomes of an observational study.

Authors:  Carlos Zerrweck; Elisa M Sepúlveda; Hernán G Maydón; Francisco Campos; Antonio G Spaventa; Verónica Pratti; Itzel Fernández
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 4.  Revisional bariatric surgery following failed primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Douglas Cheung; Noah J Switzer; Richdeep S Gill; Xinzhe Shi; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  MEDIUM-TERM FOLLOW-UP RESULTS WITH LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY.

Authors:  Almino Cardoso Ramos; Eduardo Lemos de Souza Bastos; Manoela Galvão Ramos; Nestor Tadashi Suguitani Bertin; Thales Delmondes Galvão; Raphael Torres Figueiredo de Lucena; Josemberg Marins Campos
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2015

6.  Mid-term bariatric surgery outcomes for obese patients: does weight matter?

Authors:  N Samuel; Q Jalal; A Gupta; Fak Mazari; P Vasas; S Balachandra
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Comparison of vertical sleeve gastrectomy versus biliopancreatic diversion.

Authors:  Iswanto Sucandy; Joseph Titano; Fernando Bonanni; Gintaras Antanavicius
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2014-01

8.  Redesigning the process of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy based on risk analysis resulted in 100 consecutive procedures without complications.

Authors:  Lukasz Kaska; Monika Proczko; Tomasz Stefaniak; Jarek Kobiela; Zbigniew Sledziński
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 1.195

9.  Robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese versus super obese patients.

Authors:  Parveen Bhatia; Vivek Bindal; Rahul Singh; Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia; Sudhir Kalhan; Mukund Khetan; Suviraj John
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in five staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michel Gagner; Paul Kemmeter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 4.584

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.