Literature DB >> 21925190

Multi-voxel patterns of visual category representation during episodic encoding are predictive of subsequent memory.

Brice A Kuhl1, Jesse Rissman, Anthony D Wagner.   

Abstract

Successful encoding of episodic memories is thought to depend on contributions from prefrontal and temporal lobe structures. Neural processes that contribute to successful encoding have been extensively explored through univariate analyses of neuroimaging data that compare mean activity levels elicited during the encoding of events that are subsequently remembered vs. those subsequently forgotten. Here, we applied pattern classification to fMRI data to assess the degree to which distributed patterns of activity within prefrontal and temporal lobe structures elicited during the encoding of word-image pairs were diagnostic of the visual category (Face or Scene) of the encoded image. We then assessed whether representation of category information was predictive of subsequent memory. Classification analyses indicated that temporal lobe structures contained information robustly diagnostic of visual category. Information in prefrontal cortex was less diagnostic of visual category, but was nonetheless associated with highly reliable classifier-based evidence for category representation. Critically, trials associated with greater classifier-based estimates of category representation in temporal and prefrontal regions were associated with a higher probability of subsequent remembering. Finally, consideration of trial-by-trial variance in classifier-based measures of category representation revealed positive correlations between prefrontal and temporal lobe representations, with the strength of these correlations varying as a function of the category of image being encoded. Together, these results indicate that multi-voxel representations of encoded information can provide unique insights into how visual experiences are transformed into episodic memories. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21925190      PMCID: PMC3357999          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  73 in total

1.  Assembling and encoding word representations: fMRI subsequent memory effects implicate a role for phonological control.

Authors:  Dav Clark; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Measuring functional connectivity during distinct stages of a cognitive task.

Authors:  Jesse Rissman; Adam Gazzaley; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition.

Authors:  M Bar; K S Kassam; A S Ghuman; J Boshyan; A M Schmid; A M Schmidt; A M Dale; M S Hämäläinen; K Marinkovic; D L Schacter; B R Rosen; E Halgren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Frontal lobe damage produces episodic memory impairment.

Authors:  M A Wheeler; D T Stuss; E Tulving
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.892

5.  Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  J V Haxby; M I Gobbini; M L Furey; A Ishai; J L Schouten; P Pietrini
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Greater neural pattern similarity across repetitions is associated with better memory.

Authors:  Gui Xue; Qi Dong; Chuansheng Chen; Zhonglin Lu; Jeanette A Mumford; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  FMRI evidence for an organization of prefrontal cortex by both type of process and type of information.

Authors:  Marcia K Johnson; Carol L Raye; Karen J Mitchell; Erich J Greene; Adam W Anderson
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Temporary activation of long-term memory supports working memory.

Authors:  Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  High-resolution fMRI of content-sensitive subsequent memory responses in human medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Alison R Preston; Aaron M Bornstein; J Benjamin Hutchinson; Meghan E Gaare; Gary H Glover; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Neocortical connectivity during episodic memory formation.

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Matthew Greene; Tor Wager; Tobias Egner; Joy Hirsch; Jennifer Mangels
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  48 in total

1.  Content representation in the human medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Jackson C Liang; Anthony D Wagner; Alison R Preston
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Complementary role of frontoparietal activity and cortical pattern similarity in successful episodic memory encoding.

Authors:  Gui Xue; Qi Dong; Chuansheng Chen; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jeanette A Mumford; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Attention promotes episodic encoding by stabilizing hippocampal representations.

Authors:  Mariam Aly; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Age-related differences in the neural basis of the subjective vividness of memories: evidence from multivoxel pattern classification.

Authors:  Marcia K Johnson; Brice A Kuhl; Karen J Mitchell; Elizabeth Ankudowich; Kelly A Durbin
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Neural representation of abstract task structure during generalization.

Authors:  Avinash R Vaidya; Henry M Jones; Johanny Castillo; David Badre
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Cortical reinstatement mediates the relationship between content-specific encoding activity and subsequent recollection decisions.

Authors:  Alan M Gordon; Jesse Rissman; Roozbeh Kiani; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Repetition suppression and multi-voxel pattern similarity differentially track implicit and explicit visual memory.

Authors:  Emily J Ward; Marvin M Chun; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Full correlation matrix analysis (FCMA): An unbiased method for task-related functional connectivity.

Authors:  Yida Wang; Jonathan D Cohen; Kai Li; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Category-specific neural oscillations predict recall organization during memory search.

Authors:  Neal W Morton; Michael J Kahana; Emily A Rosenberg; Gordon H Baltuch; Brian Litt; Ashwini D Sharan; Michael R Sperling; Sean M Polyn
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Global similarity and pattern separation in the human medial temporal lobe predict subsequent memory.

Authors:  Karen F LaRocque; Mary E Smith; Valerie A Carr; Nathan Witthoft; Kalanit Grill-Spector; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.