Literature DB >> 21925046

Diagnostic yield and clinical impact of wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with chronic abdominal pain with or without diarrhea: a Greek multicenter study.

Panagiotis Katsinelos1, Kostas Fasoulas, Athanasios Beltsis, Grigoris Chatzimavroudis, George Paroutoglou, Theofanis Maris, Kostas Mimidis, Alexandros Koufokotsios, Sotiris Terzoudis, Stefanos Atmatzidis, Agoritsa Kaltsa, Dimitris Kapetanos, Eustathios Kamperis, Christos Zavos, Jannis Kountouras, Aristea Belou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wireless capsule endoscopy has become the gold standard for the examination of small bowel. However, its role in the evaluation of patients suffering from chronic abdominal pain is not yet clearly defined. We conducted an open-label prospective multi-center study to evaluate the yield and clinical outcome of capsule endoscopy in patients with chronic abdominal pain with/without diarrhea.
METHODS: Seventy-two patients with chronic (>3months) abdominal pain with/without diarrhea in whom the underlying pathology could not be diagnosed by conventional modalities, underwent capsule endoscopy in either of the 6 participating centers. Patients were then followed up for clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: The overall diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy was 44.4%. More specifically, its diagnostic yield was 21.4% in patients with abdominal pain and negative inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate), 66.7% in patients with abdominal pain and positive inflammatory markers, 0% in patients with abdominal pain, diarrhea and negative inflammatory markers, and 90.1% in patients with abdominal pain, diarrhea and positive inflammatory markers. Both univariate and multivariate regression analyses showed that abnormal C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were significant factors related with positive capsule endoscopy findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Chronic abdominal pain with/without diarrhea should be accompanied by elevated inflammatory markers to be regarded as a valid indication for capsule endoscopy. The yield of capsule endoscopy in such patients is reasonably high and clinical outcomes of patients treated with capsule endoscopy findings as a guide are significant.
Copyright © 2011 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21925046     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2011.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Intern Med        ISSN: 0953-6205            Impact factor:   4.487


  13 in total

Review 1.  What defines quality in small bowel capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  Ioannis V Mitselos; Dimitrios K Christodoulou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-07

Review 2.  Wireless capsule endoscopy: perspectives beyond gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Eduardo Redondo-Cerezo; Antonio Damián Sánchez-Capilla; Paloma De La Torre-Rubio; Javier De Teresa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Update on chronic diarrhea: a run-through for the clinician.

Authors:  Davinder K Sandhu; Christina Surawicz
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-10

4.  Masquerading in the midgut: a rare diagnosis in a patient with recurrent abdominal pain.

Authors:  Philip J Smith; Trusha Patel; Nicholas Reading; Konstantinos Giaslakiotis; Sami Hoque
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-06-27

5.  Video Capsule Endoscopy in Patients with Chronic Abdominal Pain with or without Associated Symptoms: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Jeremy Egnatios; Khushboo Kaushal; Denise Kalmaz; Amir Zarrinpar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Quality Indicators for Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy.

Authors:  Ki-Nam Shim; Seong Ran Jeon; Hyun Joo Jang; Jinsu Kim; Yun Jeong Lim; Kyeong Ok Kim; Hyun Joo Song; Hyun Seok Lee; Jae Jun Park; Ji Hyun Kim; Jaeyoung Chun; Soo Jung Park; Dong-Hoon Yang; Yang Won Min; Bora Keum; Bo-In Lee
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2017-03-30

Review 7.  Capsule endoscopy for the diagnosis and follow up of Crohn's disease: a comprehensive review of current status.

Authors:  Michael Dam Jensen; Jacob Broder Brodersen; Jens Kjeldsen
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-22

8.  Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Impact of Video Capsule Endoscopy in Patients with Chronic Diarrhea: A Korean Multicenter CAPENTRY Study.

Authors:  Hyun Joo Song; Jeong Seop Moon; Seong Ran Jeon; Jin-Oh Kim; Jinsu Kim; Dae Young Cheung; Myung-Gyu Choi; Yun Jeong Lim; Ki-Nam Shim; Byong Duk Ye; Jae Hee Cheon; Cheol Hee Park; Hyun-Soo Kim; Ji Hyun Kim; Dong Kyung Chang; Jae Hyuk Do; Kyeong Ok Kim; Byung Ik Jang; Sung-Jae Shin
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.519

Review 9.  Current status and future perspectives of capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  Hyun Joo Song; Ki-Nam Shim
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2016-01-26

Review 10.  Small bowel imaging in Crohn's disease patients.

Authors:  James Gauci; Lara Sammut; Martina Sciberras; Naomi Piscopo; Kristian Micallef; Kelvin Cortis; Pierre Ellul
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.