Literature DB >> 21924502

Stereoacuity thresholds before and after visual acuity testing.

Stephen J Smith1, David A Leske, Sarah R Hatt, Jonathan M Holmes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare stereoacuity thresholds before and after visual acuity testing in patients with intermittent strabismus and in controls.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS AND CONTROLS: Eighty-eight patients (41 with intermittent strabismus and 47 controls) with measurable stereoacuity on their initial stereoacuity test were enrolled prospectively.
METHODS: Stereoacuity was measured before and immediately after visual acuity testing using the near Preschool Randot and Distance Randot stereotests. Stereoacuity was transformed to log units for analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in stereoacuity thresholds (log seconds of arc [arcsec]).
RESULTS: There was no overall deterioration in distance stereoacuity or near stereoacuity thresholds in either the intermittent strabismus or control groups. The mean change for patients with intermittent strabismus was 0.02 log arcsec (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.02 to 0.06) for near stereoacuity and 0.04 log arcsec (95% CI, -0.01 to 0.09) for distance stereoacuity. Control patients demonstrated a mean change of 0.03 log arcsec (95% CI, -0.01 to 0.06) for near stereoacuity and 0.01 log arcsec (95% CI, -0.06 to 0.08) for distance stereoacuity. These mean changes correspond to less than approximately one eighth of an octave. For individual patients, deterioration in stereoacuity beyond previously reported test-retest variability (0.6 log arcsec or more) was not observed in patients with intermittent strabismus or controls using either test.
CONCLUSIONS: Stereoacuity thresholds do not deteriorate after visual acuity testing, and therefore measurements of stereoacuity do not need to precede visual acuity measurement or other tests that involve short periods of dissociation. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21924502      PMCID: PMC3258515          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.06.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  18 in total

1.  The multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study: design and methods.

Authors:  Rohit Varma; Jennifer Deneen; Susan Cotter; Sylvia H Paz; Stanley P Azen; Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch; Peng Zhao
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.648

2.  Real depth vs randot stereotests.

Authors:  David A Leske; Eileen E Birch; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Final version of the Distance Randot Stereotest: normative data, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  Jingyun Wang; Sarah R Hatt; Anna R O'Connor; James R Drover; Russell Adams; Eileen E Birch; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 1.220

5.  Maximum angle of horizontal strabismus consistent with true stereopsis.

Authors:  David A Leske; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.220

6.  Defining real change in measures of stereoacuity.

Authors:  Wendy E Adams; David A Leske; Sarah R Hatt; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Distance stereoacuity. Assessing control in intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  R A Stathacopoulos; A L Rosenbaum; D Zanoni; D R Stager; L C McCall; A J Ziffer; M Everett
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol.

Authors:  Roy W Beck; Pamela S Moke; Andrew H Turpin; Frederick L Ferris; John Paul SanGiovanni; Chris A Johnson; Eileen E Birch; Danielle L Chandler; Terry A Cox; R Clifford Blair; Raymond T Kraker
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Random dot stereoacuity of preschool children. ALSPAC "Children in Focus" Study Team.

Authors:  E Birch; C Williams; J Hunter; M C Lapa
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.402

10.  Distance stereo acuity improvement in intermittent exotropic patients following strabismus surgery.

Authors:  T D O'Neal; A L Rosenbaum; R A Stathacopoulos
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.402

View more
  2 in total

1.  Relationship among clinical factors in childhood intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Rosanne Superstein; Trevano W Dean; Jonathan M Holmes; Danielle L Chandler; Susan A Cotter; David K Wallace; B Michele Melia; Raymond T Kraker; R Grey Weaver; Brian G Mohney; Sean P Donahue; Eileen E Birch
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 1.220

2.  Characterizing the Randot Preschool stereotest: Testability, norms, reliability, specificity and sensitivity in children aged 2-11 years.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Sheima Rafiq; Jess Hugill; Therese Casanova; Carla Black; Adam O'Neill; Vicente Puyat; Helen Haggerty; Kathryn Smart; Christine Powell; Kate Taylor; Michael P Clarke; Kathleen Vancleef
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.