Literature DB >> 21924147

Aortic valve surgery: marked increases in volume and significant decreases in mechanical valve use--an analysis of 41,227 patients over 5 years from the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland National database.

Joel Dunning1, Haiyan Gao, John Chambers, Neil Moat, Gavin Murphy, Domenic Pagano, Simon Ray, James Roxburgh, Ben Bridgewater.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Aortic valve replacement is accepted as a standard treatment for aortic stenosis and regurgitation. To help plan the national requirement for conventional and catheter-based procedures, we have analyzed the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland audit database to look at changes in practice over time.
METHODS: All patients undergoing conventional aortic valve replacement with or without coronary artery surgery from April 2004 to March 2009 were included. The main outcome measures were changes in the number, characteristics, operative details, and in-hospital mortality. We have looked particularly at trends and outcomes in elderly and high-risk patients (EuroSCORE of 10 or more) who may now be considered for percutaneous aortic valve insertion.
RESULTS: A total of 41,227 patients underwent aortic valve surgery over 5 years with an in-hospital mortality of 4.1%. The annual number increased from 7396 in 2004-2005 to 9333 in 2008-2009, with significant increases (P < .0005) in mean age (68.8-70.2 years), the proportion of patients with aortic stenosis (62.4%-65.1%), octogenarians (13.6%-18.4%), high-risk patients (24.6%-27.7%), and those receiving biological valves (65.4%-77.8%). The incidence of permanent cerebrovascular accident was 1.2% and 1.0% in patients having only an aortic valve replacement. The dialysis rate was 4.5% and the reoperation rate for bleeding was 6.6%. Overall mortality decreased from 4.4% in 2004-2005 to 3.7% in 2008-2009. Survival to a mean follow-up of 2.5 years was 89%.
CONCLUSIONS: We have seen a large increase in annual volume of aortic valve replacements, with more patients undergoing surgery for aortic stenosis and an increase in surgery in the elderly and high-risk patients.
Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21924147     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.04.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  34 in total

1.  Large-scale community echocardiographic screening reveals a major burden of undiagnosed valvular heart disease in older people: the OxVALVE Population Cohort Study.

Authors:  Joanna L d'Arcy; Sean Coffey; Margaret A Loudon; Andrew Kennedy; Jonathan Pearson-Stuttard; Jacqueline Birks; Eleni Frangou; Andrew J Farmer; David Mant; Jo Wilson; Saul G Myerson; Bernard D Prendergast
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-06-26       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Anticoagulant independent mechanical heart valves: viable now or still a distant holy grail.

Authors:  Aurelio Chaux; Richard J Gray; Jonathan C Stupka; Michael R Emken; Lawrence N Scotten; Rolland Siegel
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

3.  Valvular heart disease in the elderly: more questions than answers.

Authors:  Sean Coffey; Bernard Prendergast
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Characterization of immunogenic Neu5Gc in bioprosthetic heart valves.

Authors:  Eliran Moshe Reuven; Shani Leviatan Ben-Arye; Tal Marshanski; Michael E Breimer; Hai Yu; Imen Fellah-Hebia; Jean-Christian Roussel; Cristina Costa; Manuel Galiñanes; Rafael Mañez; Thierry Le Tourneau; Jean-Paul Soulillou; Emanuele Cozzi; Xi Chen; Vered Padler-Karavani
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.907

5.  Percutaneous paravalvular leak closure.

Authors:  Amar Krishnaswamy; E Murat Tuzcu; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-10

6.  The impact of transcatheter aortic valve implantation on patients' profiles and outcomes of aortic valve surgery programmes: a multi-institutional appraisal.

Authors:  Augusto D'Onofrio; Ottavio R Alfieri; Micaela Cioni; Francesco Alamanni; Melissa Fusari; Vincenzo Tarzia; Giulio Rizzoli; Gino Gerosa
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-01-29

Review 7.  Current status and future perspectives of prosthetic valve selection for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Hiroshi Furukawa; Kazuo Tanemoto
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-05-31

8.  [Safety of biological valves for aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis].

Authors:  B Q Zeng; S Q Yu; Y Chen; W Zhai; B Liu; S Y Zhan; F Sun
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-06-18

9.  Trends in aortic valve replacement for elderly patients in the United States, 1999-2011.

Authors:  José Augusto Barreto-Filho; Yun Wang; John A Dodson; Mayur M Desai; Lissa Sugeng; Arnar Geirsson; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Changing trends in aortic valve procedures over the past ten years-from mechanical prosthesis via stented bioprosthesis to TAVI procedures-analysis of 50,846 aortic valve cases based on a Polish National Cardiac Surgery Database.

Authors:  Krzysztof Bartus; Jerzy Sadowski; Radoslaw Litwinowicz; Grzegorz Filip; Marek Jasinski; Marek Deja; Mariusz Kusmierczyk; Szymon Pawlak; Marek Jemielity; Dariusz Jagielak; Piotr Hendzel; Piotr Suwalski; Zdzisław Tobota; Bohdan Maruszewski; Boguslaw Kapelak
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.