Literature DB >> 21923977

Free will and the obesity epidemic.

David A Levitsky1, Carly R Pacanowski.   

Abstract

The increase in body weight in the USA over the past several decades is now commonly referred to as the 'obesity epidemic'. An empirical analysis of the literature suggests that the increased weight can be accounted for by an increase in food intake. The solution to the obesity epidemic, therefore, must centre on a reduction in food consumption, a position well accepted by the American population who think that they, as individuals, are responsible for their adiposity by holding the belief that the decision as to what and how much to eat is determined by their own free will. The evidence demonstrates, however, that this is not true. Variables such as portion size, variety of foods offered, fat content of the diet, the number of people eating, the location where eating occurs and even watching food advertisements act as 'food primes' causing individuals to increase their energy intake. Despite the plethora of diets, weight-loss clubs, drugs and mechanical devices available to facilitate weight loss, once treatment is terminated and people return to the 'free' environment, their weight returns to pre-treatment levels. Only when individuals are protected from environmental variables by gastric surgery or limited to consume only portion-controlled meals can they successfully maintain a reduced weight. Combining the technique of daily weight monitoring with accepting that our eating behaviour is not determined totally by our free choice, we may be able to curb the obesity epidemic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21923977     DOI: 10.1017/S1368980011002187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nutr        ISSN: 1368-9800            Impact factor:   4.022


  18 in total

1.  Breaking the feast.

Authors:  David A Levitsky
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 2.  Weighing the Evidence of Common Beliefs in Obesity Research.

Authors:  Krista Casazza; Andrew Brown; Arne Astrup; Fredrik Bertz; Charles Baum; Michelle Bohan Brown; John Dawson; Nefertiti Durant; Gareth Dutton; David A Fields; Kevin R Fontaine; Steven Heymsfield; David Levitsky; Tapan Mehta; Nir Menachemi; P K Newby; Russell Pate; Hollie Raynor; Barbara J Rolls; Bisakha Sen; Daniel L Smith; Diana Thomas; Brian Wansink; David B Allison
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 11.176

3.  Leptin level as a biomarker of uncontrolled eating in obesity and overweight.

Authors:  Hassiba Benbaibeche; Abdenour Bounihi; Elhadj Ahmed Koceir
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 4.  Self-Weighing: Helpful or Harmful for Psychological Well-Being? A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  C R Pacanowski; J A Linde; D Neumark-Sztainer
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2015-03

5.  The physiological control of eating: signals, neurons, and networks.

Authors:  Alan G Watts; Scott E Kanoski; Graciela Sanchez-Watts; Wolfgang Langhans
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 37.312

6.  Role of amygdala central nucleus in the potentiation of consuming and instrumental lever-pressing for sucrose by cues for the presentation or interruption of sucrose delivery in rats.

Authors:  Peter C Holland; Melanie Hsu
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Deficiency in adipocyte chemokine receptor CXCR4 exacerbates obesity and compromises thermoregulatory responses of brown adipose tissue in a mouse model of diet-induced obesity.

Authors:  Longbiao Yao; Janet Heuser-Baker; Oana Herlea-Pana; Nan Zhang; Luke I Szweda; Timothy M Griffin; Jana Barlic-Dicen
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Frequent Self-Weighing with Electronic Graphic Feedback to Prevent Age-Related Weight Gain in Young Adults.

Authors:  Fredrik Bertz; Carly R Pacanowski; David A Levitsky
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.002

9.  Stimuli associated with the cancellation of food and its cues enhance eating but display negative incentive value.

Authors:  Peter C Holland
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Self-weighing among young adults: who weighs themselves and for whom does weighing affect mood? A cross-sectional study of a population-based sample.

Authors:  Samantha L Hahn; Carly R Pacanowski; Katie A Loth; Jonathan Miller; Marla E Eisenberg; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer
Journal:  J Eat Disord       Date:  2021-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.