Literature DB >> 21923970

Enrichment culture can bias the isolation of Campylobacter subtypes.

L K Williams1, L C Sait, T A Cogan, F Jørgensen, R Grogono-Thomas, T J Humphrey.   

Abstract

Enrichment culture is often used to isolate Campylobacter. This study compared isolation of Campylobacter spp. from 119 broiler chicken environments from two farms, using Preston and modified Exeter (mExeter) and modified Bolton (mBolton) enrichments. mExeter was significantly more effective in isolating Campylobacter spp. from the environmental samples compared to Preston (P<0.001) and mBolton (P<0.04) broths but there was no significant difference between the latter two methods (P>0.05). Enrichment broth type did not affect isolation from chicken faecal or soil and litter samples. C. jejuni was isolated from significantly more environmental samples using mExeter broth compared to Preston (P<0.01) and mBolton (P<0.003) broths; there was no difference between the latter two methods or between all methods for detection of C. coli (P>0.05). Only C. coli was isolated from the soil and litter samples and although both C. jejuni and C. coli were recovered from the faecal samples there was no effect of using different enrichment broths. The majority of samples where the same species had been isolated yielded the same or closely related genotypes as defined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Isolates recovered using Preston and mBolton broths were less genetically diverse than those from mExeter broth. We conclude that the enrichment method used affects both the number and species of Campylobacter isolated from naturally contaminated samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21923970     DOI: 10.1017/S0950268811001877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Infect        ISSN: 0950-2688            Impact factor:   2.451


  15 in total

1.  Comparative Detection and Quantification of Arcobacter butzleri in Stools from Diarrheic and Nondiarrheic People in Southwestern Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Andrew L Webb; Valerie F Boras; Peter Kruczkiewicz; L Brent Selinger; Eduardo N Taboada; G Douglas Inglis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Parallel Sequencing Reveals Campylobacter spp. in Commercial Meat Chickens Less than 8 Days Old.

Authors:  F M Colles; S J Hedges; R Dixon; S G Preston; P Thornhill; K K Barfod; S G Gebhardt-Henrich; P Créach; M C J Maiden; M S Dawkins; A L Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Molecular detection of Campylobacter spp. and fecal indicator bacteria during the northern migration of sandhill cranes (Grus canadensis) at the central Platte River.

Authors:  Jingrang Lu; Hodon Ryu; Jason Vogel; Jorge Santo Domingo; Nicholas J Ashbolt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Analysis of Campylobacter jejuni Subtype Distribution in the Chicken Broiler Production Continuum: a Longitudinal Examination To Identify Primary Contamination Points.

Authors:  G Douglas Inglis; Nahal Ramezani; Eduardo N Taboada; Valerie F Boras; Richard R E Uwiera
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Campylobacter shared between free-ranging cattle and sympatric wild ungulates in a natural environment (NE Spain).

Authors:  N Navarro-Gonzalez; M Ugarte-Ruiz; M C Porrero; L Zamora; G Mentaberre; E Serrano; A Mateos; S Lavín; L Domínguez
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.184

6.  Environmental monitoring of waterborne Campylobacter: evaluation of the Australian standard and a hybrid extraction-free MPN-PCR method.

Authors:  Rebekah Henry; Christelle Schang; Gayani I Chandrasena; Ana Deletic; Mark Edmunds; Dusan Jovanovic; Peter Kolotelo; Jonathan Schmidt; Richard Williamson; David McCarthy
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Method comparison for enhanced recovery, isolation and qualitative detection of C. jejuni and C. coli from wastewater effluent samples.

Authors:  María Ugarte-Ruiz; Diego Florez-Cuadrado; Trudy M Wassenaar; María Concepción Porrero; Lucas Domínguez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Bayesian analysis of culture and PCR methods for detection of Campylobacter spp. in broiler caecal samples.

Authors:  M E Arnold; E M Jones; J R Lawes; A B Vidal; F A Clifton-Hadley; J D Rodgers; L F Powell
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.434

9.  Genotypes, Antibiotic Resistance, and ST-8 Genetic Clone in Campylobacter Isolates from Sheep and Goats in Grenada.

Authors:  Diana M Stone; Yogesh Chander; Aschalew Z Bekele; Sagar M Goyal; Harry Hariharan; Keshaw Tiwari; Alfred Chikweto; Ravindra Sharma
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2014-02-11

Review 10.  A systematic review characterizing on-farm sources of Campylobacter spp. for broiler chickens.

Authors:  Agnes Agunos; Lisa Waddell; David Léger; Eduardo Taboada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.