Literature DB >> 21922537

Approximate and exact tests of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium using uncertain genotypes.

Daniel Shriner1.   

Abstract

Testing for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) is commonly used as a quality control filter in genome-wide scans for markers with experimentally determined genotypes. In contrast, for markers with imputed genotypes, there are post-imputation metrics of quality that can be used as screens but there are no formal tests of deviation from HWE. Similarly, there are no formal tests of deviation from HWE for probabilistic genotypes that are generated by sequencing projects. Here, I describe generalizations of the approximate χ(2) and exact tests of HWE for use with uncertain genotypes. The tests fully account for the probabilities of all possible genotypes at a marker for each individual. By computer simulation, the approximate and exact tests are shown to maintain valid control of the type I error rate. Calculations of the loss of power as the uncertainty in genotypes increases are illustrated. The tests are compatible with chip-based genotypes for single-nucleotide polymorphisms and copy number polymorphisms, imputed genotypes, and probabilistic assignments of genotype from variable-coverage sequence data.
© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21922537      PMCID: PMC4141651          DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  26 in total

1.  An unconditional exact test for the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium law: sample-space ordering using the Bayes factor.

Authors:  L E Montoya-Delgado; T Z Irony; C A de B Pereira; M R Whittle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The number of markers in the HapMap project: some notes on chi-square and exact tests for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

Authors:  Jan Graffelman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  SNP detection and genotyping from low-coverage sequencing data on multiple diploid samples.

Authors:  Si Quang Le; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  A note on exact tests of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

Authors:  Janis E Wigginton; David J Cutler; Goncalo R Abecasis
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Genuine Bayesian multiallelic significance test for the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium law.

Authors:  C A B Pereira; F Nakano; J M Stern; M R Whittle
Journal:  Genet Mol Res       Date:  2006-10-31

6.  Exact tests of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and homogeneity of disequilibrium across strata.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid; Anthony J Batzler; Gregory D Jenkins; Michelle A T Hildebrandt
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  MENDELIAN PROPORTIONS IN A MIXED POPULATION.

Authors:  G H Hardy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1908-07-10       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Simultaneous genotype calling and haplotype phasing improves genotype accuracy and reduces false-positive associations for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Brian L Browning; Zhaoxia Yu
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Low-coverage sequencing: implications for design of complex trait association studies.

Authors:  Yun Li; Carlo Sidore; Hyun Min Kang; Michael Boehnke; Gonçalo R Abecasis
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  A likelihood ratio test of population Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for case-control studies.

Authors:  Chang Yu; Sanguo Zhang; Chuan Zhou; Saba Sile
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.135

View more
  5 in total

1.  Impact of Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium on post-imputation quality control.

Authors:  Daniel Shriner
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  A POWERFUL METHOD FOR INCLUDING GENOTYPE UNCERTAINTY IN TESTS OF HARDY-WEINBERG EQUILIBRIUM.

Authors:  Andrew Beck; Alexander Luedtke; Keli Liu; Nathan Tintle
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2017

3.  Calculating Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) in UK Biobank: A Practical Guide for Epidemiologists.

Authors:  Jennifer A Collister; Xiaonan Liu; Lei Clifton
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Prospective cohort study of the risk factors for stress fractures in Chinese male infantry recruits.

Authors:  Lin Zhao; Qi Chang; Tao Huang; Changlin Huang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  ERCC2 gene single-nucleotide polymorphism as a prognostic factor for locally advanced head and neck carcinomas after definitive cisplatin-based radiochemotherapy.

Authors:  Maja Guberina; Ali Sak; Christoph Pöttgen; Ingeborg Tinhofer-Keilholz; Volker Budach; Panagiotis Balermpas; Jens Von der Grün; Claus Michael Rödel; Eleni Gkika; Anca-Ligia Grosu; Amir Abdollahi; Jürgen Debus; Claus Belka; Steffi Pigorsch; Stephani E Combs; David Mönnich; Daniel Zips; Chiara De-Colle; Stefan Welz; Annett Linge; Fabian Lohaus; Gustavo Baretton; Thomas Gauler; Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause; Martin Schuler; Agnes Bankfalvi; Benedikt Höing; Stephan Lang; Martin Stuschke
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.550

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.