PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of the lymph node ratio (LNR), estimated by dividing the number of positive lymph nodes (LNs) by the number of LNs examined, for stage III colorectal cancer in comparison to the new tumor, nodes, and metastasis (TNM) system, and to evaluate the relationship between the number of LNs examined and the prognostic value of the LNR. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathological data of a cohort of 266 patients with stage III colorectal cancer. We assessed the impact of LNR on the prediction of cancer recurrence in comparison to the TNM system, as well as the prognostic value of LNR in patients with a low LN count. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, the LNR was found to be an independent risk factor of cancer recurrence. The application of the LNR, in addition to the new TNM system, was more predictive of survival than the TNM system alone. A prognostic separation by LNR was observed in patients who had an adequate number of LNs examined, but not in patients with a low LN count. CONCLUSIONS: A stronger prognostic separation can be obtained by using the LNR together with the new TNM system. Adequate lymph node examination is important to ensure the prognostic value of LNR in patients with stage III colorectal cancer.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of the lymph node ratio (LNR), estimated by dividing the number of positive lymph nodes (LNs) by the number of LNs examined, for stage III colorectal cancer in comparison to the new tumor, nodes, and metastasis (TNM) system, and to evaluate the relationship between the number of LNs examined and the prognostic value of the LNR. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathological data of a cohort of 266 patients with stage III colorectal cancer. We assessed the impact of LNR on the prediction of cancer recurrence in comparison to the TNM system, as well as the prognostic value of LNR in patients with a low LN count. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, the LNR was found to be an independent risk factor of cancer recurrence. The application of the LNR, in addition to the new TNM system, was more predictive of survival than the TNM system alone. A prognostic separation by LNR was observed in patients who had an adequate number of LNs examined, but not in patients with a low LN count. CONCLUSIONS: A stronger prognostic separation can be obtained by using the LNR together with the new TNM system. Adequate lymph node examination is important to ensure the prognostic value of LNR in patients with stage III colorectal cancer.
Authors: Carlos A Vaccaro; Victor Im; Gustavo L Rossi; Guillermo Ojea Quintana; Mario L Benati; Diego Perez de Arenaza; Fernando A Bonadeo Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Young Seok Kim; Jong Hoon Kim; Sang Min Yoon; Eun Kyung Choi; Seung Do Ahn; Sang-Wook Lee; Jin Cheon Kim; Chang Sik Yu; Hee Chul Kim; Tae Won Kim; Heung Moon Chang Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-03-14 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Gennaro Galizia; Michele Orditura; Francesca Ferraraccio; Paolo Castellano; Margherita Pinto; Anna Zamboli; Sabrina Cecere; Ferdinando De Vita; Carlo Pignatelli; Eva Lieto Journal: World J Surg Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Robert Rosenberg; Jan Friederichs; Tibor Schuster; Ralf Gertler; Matthias Maak; Karen Becker; Anne Grebner; Kurt Ulm; Heinz Höfler; Hjalmar Nekarda; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Johannes Byrling; Roland Andersson; Agata Sasor; Gert Lindell; Daniel Ansari; Johan Nilsson; Bodil Andersson Journal: Ann Gastroenterol Date: 2017-06-20
Authors: Ramzi M Helewa; Donna Turner; Debrah Wirtzfeld; Jason Park; David Hochman; Piotr Czaykowski; Harminder Singh; Emma Shu; Lin Xue; Andrew McKay Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2013-06-17 Impact factor: 2.754