Literature DB >> 21922262

Concurrent EMG feedback acutely improves strength and muscle activation.

M M Ekblom1, M Eriksson.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the acute effects of electromyographic (EMG) feedback on muscle activation and strength during maximal voluntary concentric and eccentric muscle actions. 15 females performed two sets of three lengthening and three shortening maximal voluntary isokinetic knee extensions at 20° s(-1) over 60° range of motion. After the first set, subjects were randomized to either a control group (n = 8) or a feedback group (n = 7). In the second set, the control group performed tasks identical to those in the first set, whereas the feedback group additionally received concurrent visual feedback of the EMGrms from Vastus Medialis (VM). Knee extensor strength and EMG activation of VM, Vastus lateralis (VL) and hamstrings (HAM) were measured during the MVCs. Analyses were performed separately in a 1 s preactivation phase, a 1 s initial movement phase and a 1 s late movement phase. EMG feedback was associated with significantly higher knee extensor strength in all phases (20.5% p < 0.05, 18.2% p < 0.001 and 19% p < 0.001, respectively) for the eccentric MVCs and in the preactivation phase (16.3%, p < 0.001) and initial movement phases (7.2%, p < 0.05) for concentric MVCs. EMG feedback from VM further improved activation in VM and HAM but not VL. These findings suggested that concurrent visual EMG feedback from VM could acutely enhance muscle strength and activation. Before recommending implementation of EMG feedback in resistance training paradigms, the feedback parameters needs to be optimized and its long-term effects needs to be scrutinized.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21922262     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-2162-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  24 in total

1.  Neural inhibition during maximal eccentric and concentric quadriceps contraction: effects of resistance training.

Authors:  P Aagaard; E B Simonsen; J L Andersen; S P Magnusson; J Halkjaer-Kristensen; P Dyhre-Poulsen
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2000-12

2.  Effects of a single habituation session on neuromuscular isokinetic profile at different movement velocities.

Authors:  Anderson Souza Oliveira; Rogério Bulhões Corvino; Mauro Gonçalves; Fabrizio Caputo; Benedito Sergio Denadai
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Spinal reflex plasticity during maximal dynamic contractions after eccentric training.

Authors:  Julien Duclay; Alain Martin; Alice Robbe; Michel Pousson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 4.  Neural control of shortening and lengthening contractions: influence of task constraints.

Authors:  Jacques Duchateau; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Early and late rate of force development: differential adaptive responses to resistance training?

Authors:  L L Andersen; J L Andersen; M K Zebis; P Aagaard
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 4.221

6.  Greater initial adaptations to submaximal muscle lengthening than maximal shortening.

Authors:  T Hortobágyi; J Barrier; D Beard; J Braspennincx; P Koens; P Devita; L Dempsey; J Lambert
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1996-10

7.  Linearity and reliability of the EMG amplitude versus dynamic torque relationships for the superficial quadriceps femoris muscles.

Authors:  M S Stock; T W Beck; J M DeFreitas; M A Dillon
Journal:  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03

8.  Intermuscle differences in activation.

Authors:  D G Behm; J Whittle; D Button; K Power
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 9.  Can vastus medialis oblique be preferentially activated? A systematic review of electromyographic studies.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Damien Bowyer; John Dixon; Richard Stephenson; Rachel Chester; Simon T Donell
Journal:  Physiother Theory Pract       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Efficacy of EMG-biofeedback in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ozlem O Yilmaz; Ozlem Senocak; Ebru Sahin; Meltem Baydar; Selmin Gulbahar; Cigdem Bircan; Serap Alper
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.631

View more
  1 in total

1.  The effects of massed versus distributed contractions on the variability of maximal isometric force.

Authors:  Jessica McGuire; Lara Green; Kristina Calder; Jae Patterson; David A Gabriel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.