Literature DB >> 20706733

Effects of a single habituation session on neuromuscular isokinetic profile at different movement velocities.

Anderson Souza Oliveira1, Rogério Bulhões Corvino, Mauro Gonçalves, Fabrizio Caputo, Benedito Sergio Denadai.   

Abstract

Single training session (STS) may increase the power output (i.e., maximal torque) in different contraction types; however, little is known about the neuromuscular adaptations to reach this enhancement. In this way, the present study examined the differences between knee extensors EMG, kinematics, and dynamometry at 60 and 180° s(-1) before (PRE) and after (POST) a STS. Seventeen healthy males completed three different tasks: (1) 5-maximal isokinetic knee extensions, without previous habituation (PRE) at 60 and 180° s(-1); (2) in the same day and after a proper rest, two bouts of 5-maximal isokinetic contractions (STS) at 60 and 180° s(-1); and (3) in a new visit, POST consisted in new 5-maximal isokinetic contractions at 60 and 180° s(-1). The main parameters examined were: knee extensors peak torque (PT), total work (TW), EMG (prior to the movement onset, agonist and antagonist activation), rate of force (RFD), and velocity development (RVD). There was significant increase in PT [12% (60° s(-1)) and 8.7% (180° s(-1))] and TW [13.5% (60° s(-1)) and 10.7% (180° s(-1))] from PRE to POST sessions. Increases in RFD were found for both velocities (p < 0.05); however, RVD and vastus lateralis EMG prior to the movement onset were significantly higher for POST only at 60° s(-1). The RFD percentage of change (%change) was significantly correlated to %change for PT at 60° s(-1) (r(2) = 0.53) and 180° s(-1) (r(2) = 0.45). In conclusion, STS improves neural strategies to contract muscles stronger and faster at the slowest velocity, while higher velocities present different adaptations and might need more practice to further adaptations.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20706733     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1599-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  19 in total

1.  Early phase adaptations of muscle use and strength to isokinetic training.

Authors:  H Akima; H Takahashi; S Y Kuno; K Masuda; T Masuda; H Shimojo; I Anno; Y Itai; S Katsuta
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Biomechanical factors affecting running economy.

Authors:  H Kyröläinen; A Belli; P V Komi
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  The effect of short-term isokinetic training on force and rate of velocity development.

Authors:  Lee E Brown; Michael Whitehurst
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Adaptations in coactivation after isometric resistance training.

Authors:  B Carolan; E Cafarelli
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1992-09

5.  Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training.

Authors:  Per Aagaard; Erik B Simonsen; Jesper L Andersen; Peter Magnusson; Poul Dyhre-Poulsen
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-10

Review 6.  The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG.

Authors:  Dario Farina; Roberto Merletti; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-04

7.  Changes in agonist EMG activation level during MVC cannot explain early strength improvement.

Authors:  Andreas Holtermann; Karin Roeleveld; Beatrix Vereijken; Gertjan Ettema
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  [Isokinetic trunk strength testing in chronic low back pain. The role of habituation and training to improve measures].

Authors:  I Urzica; V Tiffreau; S Popielarz; B Duquesnoy; A Thevenon
Journal:  Ann Readapt Med Phys       Date:  2007-03-09

9.  Heavy-intensity aerobic exercise affects the isokinetic torque and functional but not conventional hamstrings:quadriceps ratios.

Authors:  Anderson de Souza Castelo Oliveira; Fabrizio Caputo; Mauro Gonçalves; Benedito Sérgio Denadai
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 2.368

10.  Changes in single motor unit behaviour contribute to the increase in contraction speed after dynamic training in humans.

Authors:  M Van Cutsem; J Duchateau; K Hainaut
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  6 in total

1.  Rapid hamstrings/quadriceps strength capacity in professional soccer players with different conventional isokinetic muscle strength ratios.

Authors:  Camila C Greco; Wendell L Da Silva; Sérgio R A Camarda; Benedito S Denadai
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Concurrent EMG feedback acutely improves strength and muscle activation.

Authors:  M M Ekblom; M Eriksson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Isokinetic eccentric resistance training prevents loss in mechanical muscle function after running.

Authors:  Anderson Souza Oliveira; Fabrizio Caputo; Per Aagaard; Rogério Bulhões Corvino; Mauro Gonçalves; Benedito Sergio Denadai
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Balance Exercises Circuit improves muscle strength, balance, and functional performance in older women.

Authors:  Bruna Pereira Avelar; Juliana Nunes de Almeida Costa; Marisete Peralta Safons; Maurílio Tiradentes Dutra; Martim Bottaro; Sebastião Gobbi; Anne Tiedemann; Ana Cristina de David; Ricardo Moreno Lima
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2016-01-22

5.  Postactivation potentiation biases maximal isometric strength assessment.

Authors:  Leonardo Coelho Rabello Lima; Felipe Bruno Dias Oliveira; Thiago Pires Oliveira; Claudio de Oliveira Assumpção; Camila Coelho Greco; Adalgiso Croscato Cardozo; Benedito Sérgio Denadai
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  The effects of a single session of spinal manipulation on strength and cortical drive in athletes.

Authors:  Thomas Lykke Christiansen; Imran Khan Niazi; Kelly Holt; Rasmus Wiberg Nedergaard; Jens Duehr; Kathryn Allen; Paul Marshall; Kemal S Türker; Jan Hartvigsen; Heidi Haavik
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.078

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.