| Literature DB >> 21922046 |
Kristin M Power1, Javier E Sanchez-Galan, Gary W Luskey, Kristine G Koski, David H Burns.
Abstract
This pilot study investigated the possibility that metabolomic differences exist in second trimester of women delivering at term (≥37 weeks, n = 216) and preterm (≤35 weeks, n = 11). For this retrospective study, biobanked AF samples underwent near-infrared (NIR) spectral analysis using wavelengths from 700 to 1050 nm. Spectral data was compressed then optimized by multilinear regression to create a calibration model. The resultant model was able to classify term and preterm births based on differing AF metabolomic profiles with a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. When groups were classified using a prematurity index (PI), there was a statistical difference (P < 0.001) between the predicted preterm group (PI 0.77 ± 0.08) and the term group (PI 1.00 ± 0.02). In conclusion, the 2nd trimester AF samples showed distinct differences in metabolomic profiles between patients delivering preterm as compared to those at term in functional groups related to proteins, carbohydrates, fats, polyols, and water.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21922046 PMCID: PMC3172985 DOI: 10.1155/2011/980985
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pregnancy ISSN: 2090-2727
Population Demographics.
| Maternal/Fetal Characteristicsa | ≤35 weeks | ≥37 weeks |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gestational Age (wks) | 34.8 ± 2.4* | 39.3 ± 1.9 | N/A |
| Maternal Age (yrs) | 37.5 ± 1.7 | 37.6 ± 2.4 | 0.4 |
| Pre-pregnancy BMI (kg/m2) | 23.8 ± 4.3 | 23.8 ± 4.9 | 0.6 |
| Amniocentesis Week | 15.5 ± 0.8† | 15.2 ± 1.0‡ | 0.8 |
| Birth weight (g) | 2555 ± 540 | 3429 ± 623 | <0.05 |
| Parity | 1.2 ± 0.6 | 1.1 ± 1.1 | <0.05 |
aData are reported as means ± standard deviation. Population characteristics for mothers delivering in term (n = 216) and preterm (n = 11). *Range is 28.5–35.1 weeks. †Range is 14–17 weeks. ‡Range is 12–20 weeks.
Figure 1Raw data from 227 NIR spectral profiles of AF samples plotted relative to air. The boxes labeled A and B show the regions selected by a genetic algorithm, which give the best separation of term and preterm groups.
Figure 2Box plots comparing the prematurity index for term and preterm births.
Results for the cross-validation of the calibration model and diagnostic statistics.
| Preterm pregnancies | Control term pregnancies | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of group | 11 | No. of group | 216 |
| Prematurity index (PI) ( | 0.77 | Prematurity index ( | 1.00 |
| True positives | 11 | True negatives | 216 |
| False negatives | 0 | False positives | 0 |
| Sensitivity | 100% | Specificity | 100% |
| Positive predictive value | 100% | Negative predictive value | 100% |
*P value < 0.001.
Figure 3Normalized spectral absorbance for term and preterm groups. A solid line represents the term group (≥37 weeks), and the dashed line represents the pre-term group (≤35 weeks). This region of the spectrum consists of the 2nd and 3rd overtone absorption from CH, NH, and OH functional groups. Differing concentrations of proteins, fats, and carbohydrates in the matrix lead to increased or decreased absorbance in the spectral region corresponding to the functional groups. The result is essentially a metabolome fingerprint for preterm and term births using 2nd trimester amniotic fluid.
Means and standard deviations by functional groups for term and preterm birthsa.
| Functional group ratios | Gestation periodb | |
|---|---|---|
| Preterm < 35 weeksc | Term ≥ 37 weeks | |
| NH/CH* | 3.49 ± 0.5 | 3.43 ± 0.8 |
| NH/ROH† | 2.38 ± 0.3 | 2.36 ± 0.4 |
| CH/ROH‡ | 0.69 ± 0.0 | 0.69 ± 0.0 |
| NH/H2O§ | 2.28 ± 0.2 | 2.29 ± 0.2 |
| CH/H2O¶ | 0.67 ± 0.1 | 0.69 ± 0.1 |
aData are reported as means ± standard deviation. Birth outcomes and second trimester amniotic fluid functional groups ratios for mothers delivering in term (n = 216) and preterm (n = 10).
bAll the differences between term and preterm groups were nonsignificant at a confidence level of 10%, with the exception of NH/CH which had a P value of 0.090.
cIt is important to mention that one sample that had a gestational age of 35.1 was discarded as an outlier. Its exclusion from this ratio analysis was primarily because it had a gestational age 2 weeks above the mean and also was 500 g heavier than the average of the group. *Relative amount of protein to carbohydrates/fats. †Relative amount of protein to modified polyalcohols.‡Relative amount of carbohydrates/fats to modified polyalcohols. §Relative amount of protein to water. ¶Relative amount of carbohydrates/fats to water.