| Literature DB >> 21920042 |
Eric P F Chow1, David P Wilson, Lei Zhang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: HIV prevalence among men who have sex with men (MSM) in China has rapidly increased in recent years. It is suggested that MSM could be a potential bridge of HIV transmission to the general female population. We investigated the bisexual behaviour of MSM in China through systematic review and meta-analysis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21920042 PMCID: PMC3180676 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-242
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
A summary of studies reporting bisexual behaviour among men who have sex with men in China
| Study Design | Sexual orientation % (n/N) | Condom usage % (n/N) | Quality Score | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First author, published year | Study Period | Study location | Age range | Recruitment method1 | Sampling size | Percentage of married MSM | Had female partners in last six months | Types of female partner3 | Condom use | 100% condom use in last six months | ||
| Cai GF, 2008 [ | 06/2006-12/2006 | Zhejiang | 16-46 | MSM Venues | - | 152 | 16.4% (25/152) | 18.9% (28/148) | Commercial | - | 33.3% (2/6) | 4 |
| Chen SC, 2007 [ | 07/2005-09/2005 | Hangzhou | 18-70 (28.0) | MSM Venues, internet invitation | Snowball | 365 | 26.8% (97/362) | 11.5% (42/365) | Commercial | 75.0% (3/4) | 44.4% (4/9) | 4 |
| Choi KH, 2007 [ | 09/2004-06/2005 | Shanghai | 18-56 (28.0) | MSM Venues | Snowball | 477 | 13.0% (62/477) | 25.2% (120/477) | - | - | - | 6 |
| Fu LJ, 2007 [ | 02/2006-12/2006 | Zhejiang | 19-41 (26.0) | - | Snowball | 55 | 18.2% (10/55) | 16.4% (9/55) | - | - | - | 3 |
| Hu Q, 2006 [ | 08/2005 | Jiangxi | 15-60 (25.0) | MSM Venues, internet advertisement | Snowball | 200 | 10.5% (21/200) | - | Overall | 51.1% (48/94) | - | 4 |
| Liao MZ, 2006 [ | 09/2005-11/2005 | Shandong (Jinan, Yantai, Weihai) | 18-73 (26.0) | MSM Venues | - | 157 | 12.1% (19/157) | 22.9% (36/157) | Commercial | 78.6% (11/14) | 50.0% (7/14) | 3 |
| Ruan S, 2009 [ | 03/2007-07/2007 | Jinan | N/A | Peer referral | RDS | 428 | 16.1% (69/428) | - | - | - | 5 | |
| 04/2008-06/2008 | Jinan | N/A | Peer referral | RDS | 500 | 25.4% (127/500) | - | - | - | |||
| Wu J, 2008 [ | 10/2006-12/2006 | Shanghai | 18-54 (26.6) | MSM Venues | - | 203 | 11.8% (24/203) | 43.3% (88/203) | Overall | 47.7% (42/88) | 34.1% (30/88) | 4 |
| Yang HT, 2006 [ | 05/2004-07/2004 | Jiangsu | 18-56 (28.0) | MSM Venues, internet advertisement | - | 222 | 21.6% (48/222) | 45.9% (102/222) | Overall | - | 21.3% (23/108) | 5 |
| Zhu YW, 2007 [ | 03/2006-07/2006 | Jinan | 17-66 (25.4) | CDC | - | 400 | 11.0% (44/400) | 20.0% (80/400) | Overall | - | 27.5% (22/80) | 4 |
| Gu Y, 2004 [ | 03/2003-04/2003 | Shenyang | 16-49 | MSM Venues | - | 342 | - | 36.3% (124/342) | - | - | - | 3 |
| Liu LY, 2008 [ | 2006 | Mudanjiang | N/A (29.0) | MSM Venues | - | 202 | 16.8% (34/202) | - | Overall | 26.3% (20/76) | 24.0% (12/50) | 2 |
| Wang J, 2008 [ | 08/2006-10/2006 | Harbin | N/A | MSM Venues | Convenience | 401 | - | 22.4% (90/401) | Overall | 48.9% (44/90) | - | 3 |
| Wang L, 2006 [ | 07/2004 | Heilongjiang | 17-66 | MSM Venues | - | 397 | 12.6% (50/397) | 24.7% (98/397) | - | - | - | 3 |
| Zhang D, 2007 [ | 2002 | Harbin | 18-67 | MSM Venues | - | 215 | - | 41.9% (90/215) | - | - | - | 5 |
| 2004 | Harbin | 18-67 | MSM Venues | - | 397 | - | 24.7% (98/397) | - | - | - | ||
| 2006 | Harbin | 18-67 | MSM Venues | - | 647 | - | 25.0% (162/648) | - | - | - | ||
| Zhao H, 2009 [ | 01/2008-10/2008 | Harbin | 17-52 (25.0) | VCT Clinic | - | 89 | 7.9% (7/89) | 14.6% (13/89) | Overall | 53.8% (7/13) | 30.8% (4/13) | 2 |
| Guo W, 2008 [ | 10/2007-11/2007 | Hebei | 18-54 | MSM Venues, internet chat rooms | - | 118 | 17.9% (19/106) | 33.0% (35/106) | - | - | - | 3 |
| Liu H, 2001 [ | 08/2000-10/2000 | Beijing | 16/72 (30.1) | MSM Venues | TLS | 84 | 29.8% (25/84) | 27.4% (23/84) | - | - | - | 3 |
| Liu H, 2005 [ | 09/2001-01/2002 | Beijing | 18-69 (27.0) | MSM Venues | - | 481 | 9.4% (45/481) | 30.1% (145/481) | Overall | - | 27.6% (40/145) | 4 |
| Liu H, 2007 [ | 08/2005-12/2008 | Beijing | 18-55 (27.2) | MSM Venues | - | 416 | 11.5% (48/416) | 31.7% (132/416) | Commercial | - | 75.0% (12/16) | 4 |
| Regular | - | 16.5% (16/97) | ||||||||||
| Non-commercial casual | - | 40.7% (22/54) | ||||||||||
| Ma J, 2007 [ | 04/2006-10/2006 | Tianjin | N/A (25.2) | Internet advertisement | - | 433 | 9.5% (41/433) | 22.9% (99/433) | - | - | - | 5 |
| Qu L, 2009 [ | 10/2008-12/2008 | Inner Mongolia | 18-63 (27.0) | MSM Venues | - | 604 | 21.4% (129/604) | 19.7% (119/604) | Overall | 28.6% (34/119) | 19.3% (23/119) | 2 |
| Ruan Y, 2007 [ | 06/2005-11/2005 | Beijing | 17-54 (26.2) | MSM Venues, peer referring, internet advertising | Snowball, convenience | 526 | 6.5% (34/526) | 10.6% (56/526) | Regular | - | 32.6% (14/43) | 5 |
| Non-commercial casual | - | 34.8% (8/23) | ||||||||||
| Wang CH, 2007 [ | 06/2003-10/2006 | Chengde | 15-28 | MSM Venues | Snowball | 82 | 26.8% (22/82) | 22.0% (18/82) | - | - | - | 1 |
| Wang XL, 2009 [ | 11/2008-12/2008 | Tangshan | 19-53 | MSM Venues | - | 114 | 50.0% (57/114) | 50.9% (58/114) | - | - | 2 | |
| Cai YM, 2009 [ | 10/2007-12/2007 | Shenzhen | 18-45 (27.0) | MSM Venues | RDS | 351 | 21.9% (77/351) | 28.5% (100/351) | Overall | - | 36.8% (35/95) | 3 |
| He Q, 2005 [ | 04/2003-05/2003 | Guangzhou | 18-55 | Peer referral, internet advertisement | Snowball | 121 | - | 21.5% (26/121) | Overall | - | 26.9% (7/26) | 4 |
| Li N, 2007 [ | 2006 | Henan | 17-68 (28.3) | CDC | Continuous | 187 | 31.6% (59/187) | 36.9% (69/187) | - | - | - | 2 |
| Liu H, 2009 [ | 2007 | Shenzhen | 18-45 | MSM Venues | RDS | 293 | 24.9% (73/293) | 25.9% (76/293) | Overall | - | 31.1% (91/293) | 5 |
| Xing JM, 2007 [ | 10/2005-12/2005 | Hunan | 14-65 (29.8) | MSM Venues, internet invitation | - | 372 | 27.3% (101/370) | 29.0% (108/372) | Overall | - | 32.7% (33/101) | 3 |
| Xu YF, 2008 [ | 08/2007-09/2007 | Nanning | 17-38 | Internet advertisement, peer referral | - | 230 | 6.1% (14/230) | 13.9% (32/230) | - | - | - | 2 |
| Zhong F, 2009 [ | 05/2008-08/2008 | Guangzhou | ≥ 18 | VCT Clinic | RDS | 379 | 21.9% (83/379) | 28.2% (107/379) | - | - | - | 5 |
| Miao ZF, 2009 [ | 04/2008-06/2008 | Yinchuan | 18-55 (27.7) | MSM Venues, internet | Snowball | 312 | 24.4% (76/312) | 37.5% (117/312) | Overall | 47.0% (55/117) | - | 2 |
| Zhang M, 2009 [ | 05/2008-06/2008 | Ürumqi | 18-54 (27.4) | - | RDS | 231 | 11.3% (26/231) | 16.9% (39/231) | - | - | - | 1 |
| Feng L, 2009 [ | 07/2006-11/2006 | Chongqing | ≥ 18 | MSM venues, community outreach, peer recruitment, web-based recruitment | VBS, CABC | 1000 | 18.2% (182/1000) | 24.5% (245/1000) | Overall | 36.3% (89/245) | 23.7% (58/245) | 5 |
| 07/2007-11/2007 | Chongqing | ≥ 18 | MSM venues, community outreach, peer recruitment, web-based recruitment | VBS, CABC | 1044 | 22.7% (237/1044) | 25.2% (263/1044) | Overall | 28.5% (75/263) | 22.4% (59/263) | ||
| Feng Y, 2010 [ | 03/2007-07/2007 | Chengdu | 16-44 | MSM Venues | Snowball | 538 | 19.2% (96/500) | 26.5% (136/513) | - | - | - | 6 |
| Lau JT, 2009 [ | 2005 | Kunming | 15-75 | MSM Venues, peer referral, internet recruitment | VBS, snowball | 387 | 20.4% (79/387) | 36.4% (141/387) | - | - | - | 5 |
| 2006 | Kunming | 15-75 | MSM Venues, peer referral, internet recruitment | VBS, snowball | 316 | 11.4% (36/316) | 30.1% (95/316) | - | - | - | ||
| Wang Y, 2008 [ | 12/2006-01/2007 | Mianyang | 16-57 (24.8) | MSM Community | RDS | 201 | 7.5% (15/199) | 12.9% (26/201) | Overall | 57.7% (15/26) | 42.3% (11/26) | 4 |
| Commercial | 87.5% (7/8) | 62.5% (5/8) | ||||||||||
| Xiao Y, 2009 [ | 07/2006-09/2007 | Chongqing | 18-68 (27.7) | MSM Venues, internet recruitment, community outreach, peer referral | VBS, snowball | 1692 | 17.1% (289/1692) | 21.6% (364/1689) | Overall | 35.8% (130/363) | 23.5% (85/362) | 6 |
| Zhou J, 2008 [ | 09/2006-12/2006 | Guiyang | 15-49 (24.0) | Peer referral, internet recruitment | - | 406 | 5.2% (21/406) | 7.4% (30/406) | Overall | 63.3% (19/30) | - | 5 |
| Xiao Y, 2010 [ | 07/2006-09/2006 | 20 cities from 7 provinces (Gansu, Inner Mongolia, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning, Ningxia, Chongqing) | 15-68 (28.4) | Internet advertisement, community outreach, peer referral, MSM Venues | Snowball, VBS | 4983 | 27.2% (1354/4983) | 26.0% (1298/4983) | Overall | - | 18.2% (231/1266) | 6 |
| Zhang BC, 2007 [ | 2004 | 6 cities | 15-72 (27.6) | MSM Venues | Snowball | 1389 | 17.9% (249/1389) | 42.4% (589/1389) | Overall | - | 23.6% (139/589) | 5 |
| Zhang BC, 2008 [ | 2005-2006 | 9 cities (Harbin, Shenyang, Xi'an, Zhengzhou, Shanghai, Nanjing, Chongqing, Wuhan, Chengdu) | 13-78 (29.1) | MSM Venues | Snowball | 2250 | 24.7% (555/2246) | Overall | - | 5 | ||
1 MSM Venues: including gay bars, parks, sauna, bathroom, dance clubs; VCT Clinic: HIV voluntary counseling and testing clinic
2 RDS: Respondent-Driven Sampling; TLS: time-location sampling; VBS: Venue-based sampling, CABC: Cruising area-based convenience sampling
3 Overall partnerships represent the combination of regular, non-commercial casual and commercial female partnerships.
Result of individual variable meta-regression models for each stratified meta-analysis
| Language of article: | ||||||||
| Chinese | 16.4 (13.9-19.3), n = 29 | 0.187 | 25.8 (21.7-30.4), n = 30 | 0.058 | 45.4 (37.5-53.6), n = 9 | 26.9 (23.8-30.2), n = 13 | 0.009 | |
| English | 18.2 (15.2-21.5), n = 13 | 26.8 (24.2-29.5), n = 16 | 33.6 (29.0-38.6), n = 3 | 23.4 (19.1-28.4), n = 5 | ||||
| Sample size: | ||||||||
| < 200 | 19.8 (13.1-28.9), n = 10 | 25.9 (19.8-33.2), n = 10 | -0.056 | 45.4 (37.5-53.6), n = 9 | 28.6 (24.7-32.8), n = 11 | -0.313 | ||
| ≥ 200 | 16.3 (14.3-18.4), n = 32 | 26.3 (23.4-29.5), n = 36 | 33.6 (29.0-38.6), n = 3 | - | 23.2 (20.4-26.3), n = 7 | |||
| Recruitment method: | ||||||||
| MSM venues | 18.7 (16.6-21.0), n = 30 | 28.6 (25.5-32.0), n = 33 | 38.4 (32.8-44.3), n = 9 | 25.1 (22.5-27.9), n = 15 | ||||
| Non MSM venues | 12.6 (8.6-18.1), n = 10 | 21.1 (16.2-26.9), n = 11 | 59.4 (47.4-70.3), n = 3 | 34.2 (23.6-46.6), n = 3 | 0.107 | |||
| Not reported | 13.5 (8.4-21.0), n = 2 | 16.8 (12.9-21.6), n = 2 | - | - | ||||
| Sampling method: | ||||||||
| RDS/snowball | 17.2 (14.5-20.2), n = 17 | 25.7 (21.7-30.3), n = 21 | 45.9 (36.4-55.7), n = 4 | 25.8 (21.8-30.4), n = 8 | ||||
| Other methods | 21.7 (18.1-25.8), n = 8 | 0.013 | 26.5 (22.9-30.3), n = 5 | 0.009 | 37.0 (27.4-47.7), n = 3 | 0.122 | 27.5 (19.7-36.9), n = 2 | 0.089 |
| Not reported | 14.6 (11.1-19.0), n = 17 | 26.6 (22.5-31.1), n = 20 | 41.6 (28.6-55.9), n = 5 | 24.9 (21.8-28.4), n = 8 | ||||
| Time period: | ||||||||
| 2000-2004 | 16.8 (12.2-22.9), n = 5 | 0.023 | 32.6 (27.0-38.7), n = 9 | -0.236 | - | - | 24.1 (21.4-27.1), n = 4 | 0.093 |
| 2005-2009 | 17.1 (15.0-19.3), n = 37 | 24.9 (22.1-27.9), n = 37 | 41.4 (35.5-47.5), n = 12 | 26.1 (22.8-29.7), n = 14 | ||||
Table showing the pool estimate (%), 95% confidence interval (CI), number of studies (n), meta-regression coefficient (β) and significance of β (p-value). p-values in bold print represent significant associations (p < 0.10).
Figure 1Flow chart for selection of studies with number of articles (N) and number of estimates (n).
Figure 2Forest plot of pooled estimates of percentage of married MSM in China.
Figure 3Correlation between mean age of MSM in China and the percentage of MSM who are currently married.
Figure 4Forest plot of pooled estimates of percentage of (a) MSM; and (b) married and unmarried MSM who had female partners in last six months.
Figure 5Forest plot of (a) condom use with overall female partners in the last sex act; and (b) reported consistent condom use with overall female partners in last six months.
Figure 6Forest plot of (a) condom use with commercial female partners in the last sex act; and (b) reported consistent condom use with commercial female partners in last six months.
Figure 7Forest plot of condom use with (a) regular female partners; and (b) non-commercial casual female partners in last six months.