BACKGROUND: The meta-analysis by Quinn and Fromme (2011) is reviewed and integrated into the larger field. Guidelines for future research are presented. RESULTS: With results of the meta-analysis along with those of a recent comprehensive prospective study by our group (King et al., 2011), there is a call to the field to specify terms and integrate theoretical frameworks to advance our knowledge and improve comparisons across trials. CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis is both timely and thorough and will provide clinical researchers with important information to move the field forward.
BACKGROUND: The meta-analysis by Quinn and Fromme (2011) is reviewed and integrated into the larger field. Guidelines for future research are presented. RESULTS: With results of the meta-analysis along with those of a recent comprehensive prospective study by our group (King et al., 2011), there is a call to the field to specify terms and integrate theoretical frameworks to advance our knowledge and improve comparisons across trials. CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis is both timely and thorough and will provide clinical researchers with important information to move the field forward.
Authors: Jorge S Martins; Bruce D Bartholow; M Lynne Cooper; Kelsey M Irvin; Thomas M Piasecki Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2019-07-18 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Terril L Verplaetse; Brian P Pittman; Julia M Shi; Jeanette M Tetrault; Sabrina Coppola; Sherry A McKee Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Lara A Ray; Spencer Bujarski; James MacKillop; Kelly E Courtney; Peter M Monti; Karen Miotto Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2012-12-14 Impact factor: 3.455