Literature DB >> 21914512

Mapping FACT-melanoma quality-of-life scores to EQ-5D health utility weights.

Robert L Askew1, Richard J Swartz, Yan Xing, Scott B Cantor, Merrick I Ross, Jeffrey E Gershenwald, J Lynn Palmer, Jeffrey E Lee, Janice N Cormier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to develop a mapping function from functional assessment of cancer therapy-melanoma (FACT-M) quality of life scores to the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) utility scores.
METHODS: FACT-M and EQ-5D scores were collected during a prospective study of melanoma-related quality of life at a tertiary cancer care center in the United States. The study sample was divided into development and validation datasets with equal distributions by cancer stage and treatment status. Censored Least Absolute Deviation (CLAD) and Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression analyses were performed using the developmental dataset to derive mapping functions, and model performance was examined through comparisons of residuals and measures of fit in the validation dataset. Exploratory analyses examined the predictive ability of clinical factors and individual subscales.
RESULTS: Of 273 patients, 75 were undergoing treatment with 198 in follow-up surveillance. Relatively even distributions were observed by melanoma stage: I/II (n = 102), III (n = 100), and IV (n = 71). OLS regression resulted in a mapping function of EQ-5D = 0.0037*FACT-M+0.2238 with an R(2) 0.499. CLAD regression resulted in a mapping function of EQ-5D = 0.0042*FACT-M+0.1648 with pseudo R(2) 0.328. When applied to the validation dataset, correlations between observed and predicted values resulted in identical coefficients (r = 0.824, P < 0.001). Though the mapping functions were similar, residuals were smaller at the 20th, 40th, and 60th percentiles using the OLS model. The CLAD derived mapping function resulted in smaller residuals only for patients whose EQ-5D = 1.
CONCLUSIONS: The OLS mapping function demonstrated better predictive ability and will facilitate the derivation of utilities when direct population preference measures are not available.
Copyright © 2011 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21914512     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  18 in total

1.  Mapping the cancer-specific FACT-B onto the generic SF-6Dv2.

Authors:  Azin Nahvijou; Hossein Safari; Mahmood Yousefi; Marziyeh Rajabi; Morteza Arab-Zozani; Hosein Ameri
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 4.239

2.  Probabilistic mapping of the health status measure SF-12 onto the health utility measure EQ-5D using the US-population-based scoring models.

Authors:  Quang A Le
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Sensitivity of Preference-Based Quality-of-Life Measures for Economic Evaluations in Early-Stage Melanoma.

Authors:  Mbathio Dieng; Nadine A Kasparian; Anne E Cust; Daniel S J Costa; Anh Tran; Phyllis N Butow; Scott W Menzies; Graham J Mann; Rachael L Morton
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 4.  Ipilimumab for Previously Untreated Unresectable Malignant Melanoma: A Critique of the Evidence.

Authors:  Christina Giannopoulou; Eleftherios Sideris; Ros Wade; Thirimon Moe-Byrne; Alison Eastwood; Claire McKenna
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Health-related quality of life and economic implications of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Y R Semenov; A R Rosenberg; C Herbosa; N Mehta-Shah; A C Musiek
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 9.302

6.  Is surviving enough? Coping and impact on activities of daily living among melanoma patients with lymphoedema.

Authors:  K D Cromwell; Y J Chiang; J Armer; P P Heppner; K Mungovan; M I Ross; J E Gershenwald; J E Lee; R E Royal; A Lucci; J N Cormier
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.520

7.  Methodological Comparison of Mapping the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite to EuroQoL-5D-3L Using Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Data: Secondary Analysis of NRG/RTOG 0415.

Authors:  Rahul Khairnar; Lyudmila DeMora; Howard M Sandler; W Robert Lee; Ester Villalonga-Olives; C Daniel Mullins; Francis B Palumbo; Deborah W Bruner; Fadia T Shaya; Soren M Bentzen; Amit B Shah; Shawn Malone; Jeff M Michalski; Ian S Dayes; Samantha A Seaward; Michele Albert; Adam D Currey; Thomas M Pisansky; Yuhchyau Chen; Eric M Horwitz; Albert S DeNittis; Felix Feng; Mark V Mishra
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2022-06

8.  EQ-5D Health Utility Scores: Data from a Comprehensive Canadian Cancer Centre.

Authors:  Hiten Naik; Doris Howell; Susie Su; Xin Qiu; M Catherine Brown; Ashlee Vennettilli; Margaret Irwin; Vivien Pat; Hannah Solomon; Tian Wang; Henrique Hon; Lawson Eng; Mary Mahler; Henry Thai; Valerie Ho; Wei Xu; Soo Jin Seung; Nicole Mittmann; Geoffrey Liu
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Combined cancer patient-reported symptom and health utility tool for routine clinical implementation: a real-world comparison of the ESAS and EQ-5D in multiple cancer sites.

Authors:  M Moskovitz; K Jao; J Su; M C Brown; H Naik; L Eng; T Wang; J Kuo; Y Leung; W Xu; N Mittmann; L Moody; L Barbera; G Devins; M Li; D Howell; G Liu
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Functional assessment of cancer therapy questionnaire for melanoma in the Serbian population: A factor analytic approach.

Authors:  Suzana Matkovic; Jelena Dotlic; Tatjana Gazibara; Gorica Maric; Vladimir Nikolic; Natasa Maksimovic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.