Literature DB >> 24026631

Probabilistic mapping of the health status measure SF-12 onto the health utility measure EQ-5D using the US-population-based scoring models.

Quang A Le1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Probabilistic mapping of the health status instrument SF-12 onto the health utility instrument EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D)-3L using the UK-population-based scoring model showed encouraging results as compared to other mapping methods, although its predictive performance using the US-population-based EQ-5D scoring models has not been investigated. In addition, a new and improved US-population-based EQ-5D scoring method has recently been developed and suggested for use in applications that required US societal health state values. In this study, we assessed predictive performance of the probabilistic mapping approach using the US-population-based scoring models on EQ-5D utility scores based on SF-12 responses and compared the results with those of other mapping methods.
METHODS: Using a sample of 19,678 adults from the 2003 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, we evaluated the predictive performance of probabilistic mapping using Bayesian networks, response mapping using multinomial logistic regression, ordinary least squares, and censored least absolute deviations models by implementing a fivefold cross-validation method. The EQ-5D utility scores were generated using two US-population-based models: D1 and MM-OC.
RESULTS: Overall, the probabilistic mapping approach using Bayesian networks consistently outperformed other mapping methods with mean squared errors (MSE) of 0.007 and 0.007, mean absolute errors (MAE) of 0.057 and 0.039, and overall R (2) of 0.773 and 0.770 for the US-population-based EQ-5D scoring D1 and MM-OC models, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The probabilistic mapping approach can be useful to estimate EQ-5D utility scores from SF-12 responses with better predictive measures in terms of MSE, MAE, and R (2) than other common mapping methods.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24026631     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0517-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  17 in total

1.  Mapping the SF-12 to preference-based instruments: convergent validity in a low-income, minority population.

Authors:  Peter Franks; Erica I Lubetkin; Marthe R Gold; Daniel J Tancredi
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model.

Authors:  James W Shaw; Jeffrey A Johnson; Stephen Joel Coons
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Mapping the EQ-5D index from the SF-12: US general population preferences in a nationally representative sample.

Authors:  Patrick W Sullivan; Vahram Ghushchyan
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 4.  Comparing the incomparable? A systematic review of competing techniques for converting descriptive measures of health status into QALY-weights.

Authors:  Duncan Mortimer; Leonie Segal
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 5.  A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures.

Authors:  John E Brazier; Yaling Yang; Aki Tsuchiya; Donna Louise Rowen
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2009-07-08

6.  Mapping the eight-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8) to the EQ-5D utility index.

Authors:  Y B Cheung; L C S Tan; P N Lau; W L Au; N Luo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  A median model for predicting United States population-based EQ-5D health state preferences.

Authors:  James W Shaw; A Simon Pickard; Shengsheng Yu; Shijie Chen; Vincent G Iannacchione; Jeffrey A Johnson; Stephen Joel Coons
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 5.725

8.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.

Authors:  J Ware; M Kosinski; S D Keller
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Addressing ceiling effects in health status measures: a comparison of techniques applied to measures for people with HIV disease.

Authors:  I-Chan Huang; Constantine Frangakis; Mark J Atkinson; Richard J Willke; Walter L Leite; W Bruce Vogel; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Elena B Elkin; Mithat Gonen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  5 in total

1.  How do Patient-reported Outcome Scores in International Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Registries Compare?

Authors:  Lina Holm Ingelsrud; J Mark Wilkinson; Soren Overgaard; Ola Rolfson; Brian Hallstrom; Ronald A Navarro; Michael Terner; Sunita Karmakar-Hore; Greg Webster; Luke Slawomirski; Adrian Sayers; Candan Kendir; Katherine de Bienassis; Niek Klazinga; Annette W Dahl; Eric Bohm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Joanna Leaviss; Sarah Davis; Shijie Ren; Jean Hamilton; Alison Scope; Andrew Booth; Anthea Sutton; Glenys Parry; Marta Buszewicz; Rona Moss-Morris; Peter White
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Level of agreement between patient-reported EQ-5D responses and EQ-5D responses mapped from the SF-12 in an injury population.

Authors:  Belinda J Gabbe; Emma McDermott; Pam M Simpson; Sarah Derrett; Shanthi Ameratunga; Suzanne Polinder; Ronan A Lyons; Frederick P Rivara; James E Harrison
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2015-06-13

4.  Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis.

Authors:  Ola Rolfson; Eric Bohm; Patricia Franklin; Stephen Lyman; Geke Denissen; Jill Dawson; Jennifer Dunn; Kate Eresian Chenok; Michael Dunbar; Søren Overgaard; Göran Garellick; Anne Lübbeke
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Defining an International Standard Set of Outcome Measures for Patients With Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis: Consensus of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Working Group.

Authors:  Ola Rolfson; Stephanie Wissig; Lisa van Maasakkers; Caleb Stowell; Ilana Ackerman; David Ayers; Thomas Barber; Thami Benzakour; Kevin Bozic; Nicolaas Budhiparama; James Caillouette; Philip G Conaghan; Leif Dahlberg; Jennifer Dunn; John Grady-Benson; Said A Ibrahim; Sally Lewis; Henrik Malchau; Mojieb Manzary; Lyn March; Nader Nassif; Rob Nelissen; Noel Smith; Patricia D Franklin
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.794

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.