Literature DB >> 21913322

Evaluating the aquatic toxicity of complex organic chemical mixtures: lessons learned from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and petroleum hydrocarbon case studies.

Peter F Landrum1, Peter M Chapman, Jerry Neff, David S Page.   

Abstract

Experimental designs for evaluating complex mixture toxicity in aquatic environments can be highly variable and, if not appropriate, can produce and have produced data that are difficult or impossible to interpret accurately. We build on and synthesize recent critical reviews of mixture toxicity using lessons learned from 4 case studies, ranging from binary to more complex mixtures of primarily polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and petroleum hydrocarbons, to provide guidance for evaluating the aquatic toxicity of complex mixtures of organic chemicals. Two fundamental requirements include establishing a dose-response relationship and determining the causative agent (or agents) of any observed toxicity. Meeting these 2 requirements involves ensuring appropriate exposure conditions and measurement endpoints, considering modifying factors (e.g., test conditions, test organism life stages and feeding behavior, chemical transformations, mixture dilutions, sorbing phases), and correctly interpreting dose-response relationships. Specific recommendations are provided.
Copyright © 2011 SETAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21913322     DOI: 10.1002/ieam.277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  7 in total

1.  Tissue-based environmental quality benchmarks and standards.

Authors:  James P Meador; Michael St J Warne; Peter M Chapman; King Ming Chan; Shen Yu; Kenneth M Y Leung
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  EPA's Stage 2 Disinfection Byproducts Rules (DBPR) and Northern Kentucky Water: An Economic and Scientific Review.

Authors:  Hugh Henry
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Evaluation of consistency for multiple experiments of a single combination in the time-dependence mixture toxicity assay.

Authors:  D A Dawson; G Pöch
Journal:  Toxicol Mech Methods       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.987

4.  Evaluation of time-dependent toxicity and combined effects for a series of mono-halogenated acetonitrile-containing binary mixtures.

Authors:  Douglas A Dawson; Daphne Guinn; Gerald Pöch
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2016-07-25

5.  Species sensitivity assessment of five Atlantic scleractinian coral species to 1-methylnaphthalene.

Authors:  D Abigail Renegar; Nicholas R Turner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Influence of exposure and toxicokinetics on measures of aquatic toxicity for organic contaminants: a case study review.

Authors:  Peter F Landrum; Peter M Chapman; Jerry Neff; David S Page
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.992

7.  It's the Dose, Not the Hypothesis: Reply to.

Authors:  David S Page; Peter M Chapman; Peter F Landrum; Jerry Neff; Ralph Elston
Journal:  Hum Ecol Risk Assess       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.190

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.