Literature DB >> 21913231

Anatomic classification of the endoscopic appearance of the normal appendiceal orifice: a novel tool for recognition and documentation of cecal intubation.

Florence M Aslinia1, Preet Bagi, John D Sorkin, Richard B Williams, Robert G Knodell, Lawrence F Sorkin, Bruce D Greenwald, Allison Steele, Jean-Pierre Raufman.   

Abstract

Complete colonoscopy for cancer screening requires cecal intubation. Failure to reach and examine the cecum may result in missed right colon pathology. We developed and validated a novel classification scheme for the endoscopic appearance of the normal appendiceal orifice (AO). We analyzed 1,456 AO images and grouped them into four categories based on distinguishing features: "diverticuloid," "umbilicoid," "crescent," and "linear." An expert panel classified the images and modified these categories, combining crescent and linear categories into "curvilinear." A 100-image subset was classified twice by a validation cohort consisting of gastroenterology faculty and fellows. Inter-observer agreement among the expert panel, and intra- and inter-observer agreement among the validation cohort were analyzed using Fleiss' kappa statistic. The distribution of AO images was 67% curvilinear, 19% umbilicoid, and 10% diverticuloid; 85 images (4%) were not classifiable. There was substantial inter-observer agreement among the expert panel (κ, 0.72). Inter-observer agreement among the validation cohort was moderate (κ, 0.53 and 0.55 for the first and second viewing, respectively). Intra-observer κ values among the validation cohort were 0.69 for the overall classification, 0.65 for diverticuloid, 0.70 for umbilicoid, and 0.70 for curvilinear, indicating substantial agreement. This simple, validated classification scheme for the endoscopic appearance of the normal AO can be used both as a research and clinical tool to measure endoscopic quality, improve cecal examination, and document successful cecal intubation.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21913231      PMCID: PMC4041536          DOI: 10.1002/ca.21276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Anat        ISSN: 0897-3806            Impact factor:   2.414


  26 in total

1.  Still photography versus videotaping for documentation of cecal intubation: a prospective study.

Authors:  D K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  ESGE recommendations for quality control in gastrointestinal endoscopy: guidelines for image documentation in upper and lower GI endoscopy.

Authors:  J F Rey; R Lambert
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Can we fix colonoscopy?...Yes!

Authors:  Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 4.  Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.

Authors:  David Lieberman; Marion Nadel; Robert A Smith; Wendy Atkin; Subash B Duggirala; Robert Fletcher; Seth N Glick; C Daniel Johnson; Theodore R Levin; John B Pope; Michael B Potter; David Ransohoff; Douglas Rex; Robert Schoen; Paul Schroy; Sidney Winawer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Photodocumentation of total colonoscopy: how successful are endoscopists? Do reviewers agree?

Authors:  J B Marshall; D N Brown
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Brian Bressler; Lawrence F Paszat; Zhongliang Chen; Deanna M Rothwell; Chris Vinden; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Intussusception of the appendix.

Authors:  L B Langsam; P K Raj; C F Galang
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Rinku Sutradhar; Shawn S Forbes; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Stigmata of hemorrhage in bleeding peptic ulcers: an interobserver agreement study among international experts.

Authors:  J Y Lau; J J Sung; A C Chan; G W Lai; J T Lau; E K Ng; S C Chung; A K Li
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Meredith A Goldwasser; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; David R Urbach; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.