| Literature DB >> 21910903 |
Soo Hyun Kim1, Sang Hoon Oh, Seung Pill Choi, Kyu Nam Park, Young Min Kim, Chun Song Youn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The early use of reperfusion therapy has a significant effect on the prognosis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and it is recommended that emergency department (ED) physicians activate the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) as soon as possible to treat these patients. The aim of this study was to examine the appropriateness of emergency physician activation of the CCL for patients with suspected STEMI. Inappropriate activations (i.e., false positive activations) were identified according to a variety of criteria.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21910903 PMCID: PMC3180401 DOI: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-50
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ISSN: 1757-7241 Impact factor: 2.953
Patient demographics according to ST elevation
| ST elevation, Yes | ST elevation, No | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex, male | 75 (71.4%) | 7 (58.4%) | 0.348 |
| Age | 63.3 ± 15.4 | 64.7 ± 16.1 | 0.777 |
| Chief Complaint | 0.161 | ||
| Chest pain | 80 (76.2%) | 7 (58.4%) | |
| Dyspnea | 14 (13.3%) | 3 (25%) | |
| Epigastric pain | 4 (3.8%) | 0 (0%) | |
| General weakness | 3 (2.8%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Syncope | 2 (1.9%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Dizziness | 1 (1.0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Palpitation | 0 (0%) | 1 (8.3%) | |
| Nausea/Vomiting | 1 (1.0%) | 1 (8.3%) | |
| Duty, on | 46 (43.8%) | 4 (33.3%) | 0.487 |
Figure 1Flowchart for single page activation of the cardiac catheterization laboratory by emergency physician for patients with suspected ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. CCL: cardiac catheterization laboratory, EP: emergency physician, STEMI: ST-elevation myocardial infarction, PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention, CAD: coronary artery disease.
Time intervals according to ST elevation
| ST elevation, Yes | ST elevation, No | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Door-to-ECG time Median, IQR | 7 (3, 13) | 9.5 (2,17) | 0.942 |
| Door-to-balloon time Median, IQR | 68 (57, 84) | 221 (180, 262) | 0.021 |
| % of door-to-balloon time < 90 min | 79 (86.8%) | 0 (0%) | 0.001 |
Time intervals according to the chief complaint and on- or off-duty times
| Chief complaint | Chief complaint | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Door-to-ECG time Median, IQR | 6 (2, 12) | 9 (4,16) | 0.077 |
| Door-to-balloon time Median, IQR | 66.5 (56, 82) | 80 (67, 89) | 0.028 |
| % of door-to-balloon time < 90 min | 65 (85.5%) | 14 (82.4%) | 0.741 |
| On duty | Off duty | p | |
| Door-to-ECG time Median, IQR | 10 (6, 17) | 4.5 (1,9) | 0.001 |
| Door-to-balloon time Median, IQR | 63 (53, 78) | 77 (64, 86) | 0.013 |
| % of door-to-balloon time < 90 min | 38 (88.4%) | 41 (82.0%) | 0.392 |