Literature DB >> 19767126

An evaluation of the accuracy of emergency physician activation of the cardiac catheterization laboratory for patients with suspected ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Michael C Kontos1, Michael Christopher Kurz, Charlotte S Roberts, Sarah E Joyner, Laura Kreisa, Joseph P Ornato, George W Vetrovec.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Current recommendations indicate that emergency physicians should activate cardiac catheterization laboratory personnel by a single page for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. We assessed the accuracy of emergency physician cardiac catheterization laboratory activations, angiographic findings, outcomes, and treatment times among patients with and without STEMI.
METHODS: We classified the appropriateness and outcomes of consecutive emergency physician STEMI pages between June 2006 and September 2008. Emergency physician activations of the cardiac catheterization laboratory were classified according to the findings of the initial ECG compared with cardiology interpretation for the presence of STEMI and presence of coronary disease.
RESULTS: During a 27-month period, emergency physician activation of the cardiac catheterization laboratory occurred 249 times. There were 188 (76%) patients with a true STEMI, of whom 13 did not receive emergency angiography. Of the 37 (15%) patients who had ECG findings meeting STEMI criteria and who ultimately did not have myocardial necrosis and underwent emergency angiography, 12 had significant disease and 5 had revascularization performed. Eleven patients had ECGs concerning for but not meeting STEMI criteria; all had emergency angiography (n=11) or received a diagnosis of non-STEMI (n=6). Only 13 patients were considered as having received unnecessary cardiac catheterization laboratory activations (5.2%) in which emergency angiography was not performed and myocardial infarction was excluded.
CONCLUSION: A significant number of emergency physician STEMI cardiac catheterization laboratory activations are for patients who did not meet standard STEMI criteria. However, most had ECG findings and symptoms that lead to emergency angiography, had significant disease, or were diagnosed with non-STEMI. Only a small percentage of patients received unnecessary cardiac catheterization laboratory activations. Our findings support current recommendations for emergency physician cardiac catheterization laboratory activation for potential STEMI patients. Copyright 2009 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19767126     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  14 in total

1.  Time for a new paradigm shift in myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Emre K Aslanger; H Pendell Meyers; Stephen W Smith
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.596

2.  A tale of two formulas: Differentiation of subtle anterior MI from benign ST segment elevation.

Authors:  Emrah Bozbeyoğlu; Emre Aslanger; Özlem Yıldırımtürk; Barış Şimşek; Can Yücel Karabay; Mustafa Aytek Şimşek; Ahmet İlker Tekkeşin; Muzaffer Değertekin; Ömer Kozan
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Association between timing of antibiotic administration and mortality from septic shock in patients treated with a quantitative resuscitation protocol.

Authors:  Michael A Puskarich; Stephen Trzeciak; Nathan I Shapiro; Ryan C Arnold; James M Horton; Jonathan R Studnek; Jeffrey A Kline; Alan E Jones
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  DIagnostic accuracy oF electrocardiogram for acute coronary OCClUsion resuLTing in myocardial infarction (DIFOCCULT Study).

Authors:  Emre K Aslanger; Özlem Yıldırımtürk; Barış Şimşek; Emrah Bozbeyoğlu; Mustafa Aytek Şimşek; Can Yücel Karabay; Stephen W Smith; Muzaffer Değertekin
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2020-07-30

5.  Electrocardiographic diagnosis of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: An evaluation of three automated interpretation algorithms.

Authors:  J Lee Garvey; Jessica Zegre-Hemsey; Richard Gregg; Jonathan R Studnek
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 1.438

6.  Electrocardiograhic findings resulting in inappropriate cardiac catheterization laboratory activation for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Shariq Shamim; Justin McCrary; Lori Wayne; Matthew Gratton; Douglas B Bogart
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-06

7.  Implementation of multiple strategies for improved door-to-balloon time in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Ming-Wei Pan; Shou-Yen Chen; Chun-Chi Chen; Wei-Jan Chen; Chi-Jen Chang; Chia-Pin Lin; Yi-Ming Weng; Yu-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  The appropriateness of single page of activation of the cardiac catheterization laboratory by emergency physician for patients with suspected ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a cohort study.

Authors:  Soo Hyun Kim; Sang Hoon Oh; Seung Pill Choi; Kyu Nam Park; Young Min Kim; Chun Song Youn
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  False activation of the cardiac catheterization laboratory: The price to pay for shorter treatment delay.

Authors:  George Degheim; Abeer Berry; Marcel Zughaib
Journal:  JRSM Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2019-04-08

10.  Physician accuracy in interpreting potential ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction electrocardiograms.

Authors:  James M McCabe; Ehrin J Armstrong; Ivy Ku; Ameya Kulkarni; Kurt S Hoffmayer; Prashant D Bhave; Stephen W Waldo; Priscilla Hsue; John C Stein; Gregory M Marcus; Scott Kinlay; Peter Ganz
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.