Literature DB >> 21909892

Single-molecule protein unfolding and refolding using atomic force microscopy.

Thomas Bornschlögl1, Matthias Rief.   

Abstract

Over the past few years, atomic force microscopy (AFM) became a prominent tool to study the mechanical properties of proteins and protein interactions on a single-molecule level. AFM together with other mechanical, single-molecule manipulating techniques (Bustamante et al., Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 1:130-136, 2000) made it possible to probe biological molecules in a way that is complementary to single-molecule methods using chemicals or temperature as a denaturant (Borgia et al., Annu Rev Biochem 77:101-125, 2008). For example, AFM offered new insights into the process of protein folding and unfolding by probing single proteins with mechanical forces. Since many proteins fulfill mechanical function or are exerted to mechanical forces in their natural environment, AFM allows to target physiologically relevant questions. Although the number of proteins unfolded with AFM continually increases (Linke and Grutzner, Pflugers Arch 456:101-115, 2008; Zhuang and Rief, Curr Opin Struct Biol 13:88-97, 2003; Clausen-Schaumann et al., Curr Opin Chem Biol 4:524-530, 2000; Rounsevell et al., Methods 34:100-111, 2004), the total number of proteins studied so far is still relatively small (Oberhauser and Carrion-Vazquez, J Biol Chem 283:6617-6621, 2008). This chapter aims at giving protocol-like instructions for people who are actually getting started using AFM to study mechanical protein unfolding or refolding. The instruction includes different approaches to produce polyproteins or modular protein chains which are commonly used to screen for true single-molecule AFM data traces. Also, the basic principles for data collection with AFM and the basic data analysis methods are explained. For people who want to study proteins that unfold at small forces or for people who want to study protein folding which also occurs typically at small forces (<30 pN), an averaging technique is explained, allowing to increase the force resolution in this regime. For topics that would go beyond the scope of this chapter - as, for example, the details about different cantilever calibration methods - references are provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21909892     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-282-3_13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  9 in total

1.  Single-molecule studies on PolySUMO proteins reveal their mechanical flexibility.

Authors:  Hema Chandra Kotamarthi; Riddhi Sharma; Sri Rama Koti Ainavarapu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Tracking unfolding and refolding reactions of single proteins using atomic force microscopy methods.

Authors:  Paul J Bujalowski; Andres F Oberhauser
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 3.  Beta-barrel scaffold of fluorescent proteins: folding, stability and role in chromophore formation.

Authors:  Olesya V Stepanenko; Olga V Stepanenko; Irina M Kuznetsova; Vladislav V Verkhusha; Konstantin K Turoverov
Journal:  Int Rev Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.813

4.  Improved Free-Energy Landscape Quantification Illustrated with a Computationally Designed Protein-Ligand Interaction.

Authors:  William J Van Patten; Robert Walder; Ayush Adhikari; Stephen R Okoniewski; Rashmi Ravichandran; Christine E Tinberg; David Baker; Thomas T Perkins
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.102

5.  Rapid Characterization of a Mechanically Labile α-Helical Protein Enabled by Efficient Site-Specific Bioconjugation.

Authors:  Robert Walder; Marc-André LeBlanc; William J Van Patten; Devin T Edwards; Jacob A Greenberg; Ayush Adhikari; Stephen R Okoniewski; Ruby May A Sullan; David Rabuka; Marcelo C Sousa; Thomas T Perkins
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Identifying discrete states of a biological system using a novel step detection algorithm.

Authors:  Jan Opfer; Kay-Eberhard Gottschalk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A rapid cloning method employing orthogonal end protection.

Authors:  Arjen J Jakobi; Eric G Huizinga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Superglue from bacteria: unbreakable bridges for protein nanotechnology.

Authors:  Gianluca Veggiani; Bijan Zakeri; Mark Howarth
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 19.536

9.  Ca2+ binding enhanced mechanical stability of an archaeal crystallin.

Authors:  Venkatraman Ramanujam; Hema Chandra Kotamarthi; Sri Rama Koti Ainavarapu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.