Literature DB >> 21909708

Improving reproducibility of VEP recording in rats: electrodes, stimulus source and peak analysis.

Yuyi You1, Alexander Klistorner, Johnson Thie, Stuart L Graham.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to evaluate and improve the reproducibility of visual evoked potential (VEP) measurement in rats and to develop a mini-Ganzfeld stimulator for rat VEP recording. VEPs of Sprague-Dawley rats were recorded on one randomly selected eye on three separate days within a week, and the recordings were repeated three times on the first day to evaluate the intrasession repeatability and intersession reproducibility. The VEPs were recorded with subdermal needle and implanted skull screw electrodes, respectively, to evaluate the effect of electrode configuration on VEP reproducibility. We also designed a mini-Ganzfeld stimulator for rats, which provided better eye isolation than the conventional visual stimuli such as flash strobes and large Ganzfeld systems. The VEP responses from mini-Ganzfeld were compared with PS33-PLUS photic strobe and single light-emitting diode (LED). The latencies of P1, N1, P2, N2, and P3 and the amplitude of each component were measured and analysed. Intrasession and intersession within-subject standard deviations (Sw), coefficient of variation, repeatability (R95) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated. The VEPs recorded using the implanted skull electrodes showed significantly larger amplitude and higher reproducibility compared to the needle electrodes (P<0.05). The mini-Ganzfeld stimulator showed superior repeatability and reproducibility in VEP recording. The intra/intersession ICCs of latency were 0.85/0.70 for mini-Ganzfeld, 0.72/0.62 for PS33-PLUS and only 0.59/0.42 for single LED. The latencies of the early peaks (N1 and P2) demonstrated better reproducibility than the later waves. The mean intrasession and intersession ICCs were 0.96 and 0.86 for the early peaks. Using a combination of skull screw electrodes, mini-Ganzfeld stimulator and early peak analysis, we achieved a high reproducibility in the rat VEP measurement. The latencies of the early peaks of rat VEPs were more consistent, which may be due to their generation in the primary visual cortex via the retino-geniculate fibres.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21909708     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-011-9288-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  25 in total

1.  Restoration of visual response in aged dystrophic RCS rats using AAV-mediated channelopsin-2 gene transfer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Tomita; Eriko Sugano; Hiromu Yawo; Toru Ishizuka; Hitomi Isago; Satoko Narikawa; Sebastian Kügler; Makoto Tamai
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Visually evoked responses in the rat, guinea pig, cat, monkey, and man.

Authors:  D J Creel; R E Dustman; E C Beck
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The hemispheric distribution of the transient rat VEP: a comparison of flash and pattern stimulation.

Authors:  M Onofrj; C Harnois; I Bodis-Wollner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Latency delay of visual evoked potential is a real measurement of demyelination in a rat model of optic neuritis.

Authors:  Yuyi You; Alexander Klistorner; Johnson Thie; Stuart L Graham
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Differential retinal growth appears to be the primary factor producing the ganglion cell density gradient in the rat.

Authors:  M J McCall; S R Robinson; B Dreher
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1987-08-18       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  The effect of vitamin E on stress-induced changes in visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in rats exposed to different experimental stress models.

Authors:  Piraye Yargiçoğlu; Nazmi Yaraş; Aysel Ağar; Saadet Gümüşlü; Süreyya Bilmen; Gül Ozkaya
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2003-04

8.  Neuroprotective effect of transcorneal electrical stimulation on the acute phase of optic nerve injury.

Authors:  Ken-ichiro Miyake; Miho Yoshida; Yoshitsugu Inoue; Yoshio Hata
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Quantification of ischemic damage in the rat retina: a comparative study using evoked potentials, electroretinography, and histology.

Authors:  Thomas Jehle; Karin Wingert; Cornelia Dimitriu; Wolfram Meschede; Julia Lasseck; Michael Bach; Wolf A Lagrèze
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  The effects of certain H(1)-antagonists on visual evoked potential in rats.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Iwamura; Yoko Fujii; Chiaki Kamei
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2003-08-30       Impact factor: 4.077

View more
  12 in total

1.  Visual Evoked Potential Recording in a Rat Model of Experimental Optic Nerve Demyelination.

Authors:  Yuyi You; Vivek K Gupta; Nitin Chitranshi; Brittany Reedman; Alexander Klistorner; Stuart L Graham
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Visual evoked potentials can be reliably recorded using noninvasive epidermal electrodes in the anesthetized rat.

Authors:  Roberto Santangelo; Valerio Castoldi; Raffaele D'Isa; Silvia Marenna; Su-Chun Huang; Marco Cursi; Giancarlo Comi; Letizia Leocani
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Semi-invasive and non-invasive recording of visual evoked potentials in mice.

Authors:  Silvia Marenna; Valerio Castoldi; Raffaele d'Isa; Cursi Marco; Giancarlo Comi; Letizia Leocani
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Polymer Skulls With Integrated Transparent Electrode Arrays for Cortex-Wide Opto-Electrophysiological Recordings.

Authors:  Preston D Donaldson; Zahra S Navabi; Russell E Carter; Skylar M L Fausner; Leila Ghanbari; Timothy J Ebner; Sarah L Swisher; Suhasa B Kodandaramaiah
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 11.092

5.  Optic nerve injury models under varying forces.

Authors:  Wu Sun; Guojun Chao; Mengqiu Shang; Qiong Wu; Yanting Xia; Qiping Wei; Jian Zhou; Liang Liao
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 2.029

6.  Reliability of VEP Recordings Using Chronically Implanted Screw Electrodes in Mice.

Authors:  Kalina Makowiecki; Andrew Garrett; Vince Clark; Stuart L Graham; Jennifer Rodger
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Two-photon scanning microscopy of in vivo sensory responses of cortical neurons genetically encoded with a fluorescent voltage sensor in rat.

Authors:  Kurt F Ahrens; Barbara Heider; Hanson Lee; Ehud Y Isacoff; Ralph M Siegel
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.492

8.  Functional and diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the sheep brain.

Authors:  Wonhye Lee; Stephanie D Lee; Michael Y Park; Lori Foley; Erin Purcell-Estabrook; Hyungmin Kim; Seung-Schik Yoo
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Visual evoked potential in RCS rats with Okayama University-type retinal prosthesis (OUReP™) implantation.

Authors:  Toshihiko Matsuo; Osamu Hosoya; Tetsuya Uchida
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 1.731

10.  Low-intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation requires concurrent visual system activity to modulate visual evoked potentials in adult mice.

Authors:  Kalina Makowiecki; Andrew Garrett; Alan R Harvey; Jennifer Rodger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.