Letícia M Furlanetto1, Bianca Stefanello. 1. Department of Internal Medicine–Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil. leticiafurlanetto@yahoo.com.br
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify psychosocial and clinical correlates of suicidal ideation in medical inpatients. METHOD: In a cross-sectional study, all adults consecutively admitted to the medical wards of a University Hospital had their names recorded and were randomized and evaluated during the first week of admission. Suicidal ideation was assessed using Item 9 of Patient Health Questionnaire-9. The Beck Depression Inventory, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, the WHO Subjective well-being scale, the Charlson Comorbidity Index and other numerical rating scales (pain and self-reported physical illness severity) were used. Patients with less than four confidants were considered with poor social support. The Student's t test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test and stepwise logistic regression analysis were used. RESULTS: Of the 1092 patients who composed the sample, 7.2% reported having suicidal ideation. After adjusting for psychosocial and clinical confounders, prior suicide attempts (OR: 4.41; 95% CI: 2.12-9.15; P<.001), depressive symptoms (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.06-1.17; P<.001), severe anxiety symptoms (OR: 3.04; 95% CI: 1.47-6.26; P=.003) and poor social support (OR: 2.02; 95% CI:1.03-3.96; P=.04) were independently associated with suicidal ideation. CONCLUSIONS: Three out of the four correlates of suicidal ideation in medical inpatients are potentially modifiable factors: severe anxiety, depressive symptoms and poor social support. The fourth variable, prior suicide attempts, is not modifiable but should serve as a red flag to suspect and investigate current suicide risk. These findings highlight the importance of suicidal ideation as a proxy for the distress that is incumbent upon physicians to manage if they wish to provide excellent and comprehensive inpatient care. Copyright Â
OBJECTIVE: To identify psychosocial and clinical correlates of suicidal ideation in medical inpatients. METHOD: In a cross-sectional study, all adults consecutively admitted to the medical wards of a University Hospital had their names recorded and were randomized and evaluated during the first week of admission. Suicidal ideation was assessed using Item 9 of Patient Health Questionnaire-9. The Beck Depression Inventory, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, the WHO Subjective well-being scale, the Charlson Comorbidity Index and other numerical rating scales (pain and self-reported physical illness severity) were used. Patients with less than four confidants were considered with poor social support. The Student's t test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test and stepwise logistic regression analysis were used. RESULTS: Of the 1092 patients who composed the sample, 7.2% reported having suicidal ideation. After adjusting for psychosocial and clinical confounders, prior suicide attempts (OR: 4.41; 95% CI: 2.12-9.15; P<.001), depressive symptoms (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.06-1.17; P<.001), severe anxiety symptoms (OR: 3.04; 95% CI: 1.47-6.26; P=.003) and poor social support (OR: 2.02; 95% CI:1.03-3.96; P=.04) were independently associated with suicidal ideation. CONCLUSIONS: Three out of the four correlates of suicidal ideation in medical inpatients are potentially modifiable factors: severe anxiety, depressive symptoms and poor social support. The fourth variable, prior suicide attempts, is not modifiable but should serve as a red flag to suspect and investigate current suicide risk. These findings highlight the importance of suicidal ideation as a proxy for the distress that is incumbent upon physicians to manage if they wish to provide excellent and comprehensive inpatient care. Copyright Â
Authors: Lisa M Horowitz; Deborah Snyder; Erica Ludi; Donald L Rosenstein; Julie Kohn-Godbout; Laura Lee; Tannia Cartledge; Adrienne Farrar; Maryland Pao Journal: Psychosomatics Date: 2013-02-08 Impact factor: 2.386
Authors: Kelly M Trevino; Caroline H Abbott; Michael J Fisch; Robert J Friedlander; Paul R Duberstein; Holly G Prigerson Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-05-28 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Deborah J Snyder; Elizabeth D Ballard; Ian H Stanley; Erica Ludi; Julie Kohn-Godbout; Maryland Pao; Lisa M Horowitz Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Caroline Lücke; Jürgen M Gschossmann; Alena Schmidt; Juliane Gschossmann; Alexandra Philomena Lam; Charlotte Elizabeth Schneider; Alexandra Philipsen; Helge H Müller Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Boyoung Park; So Young Kim; Ji-Yeon Shin; Robert W Sanson-Fisher; Dong Wook Shin; Juhee Cho; Jong Hyock Park Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-04-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Annabelle M Mournet; Jarrod T Smith; Jeffrey A Bridge; Edwin D Boudreaux; Deborah J Snyder; Cynthia A Claassen; David A Jobes; Maryland Pao; Lisa M Horowitz Journal: J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry Date: 2021-02-12
Authors: Brittany B Dennis; Pavel S Roshanov; Monica Bawor; Wala ElSheikh; Sue Garton; Jane DeJesus; Sumathy Rangarajan; Judith Vair; Heather Sholer; Nichole Hutchinson; Elisabeth Lordan; Lehana Thabane; Zainab Samaan Journal: Crisis Date: 2015
Authors: Meha Bhatt; Stefan Perera; Laura Zielinski; Rebecca B Eisen; Sharon Yeung; Wala El-Sheikh; Jane DeJesus; Sumathy Rangarajan; Heather Sholer; Elizabeth Iordan; Pam Mackie; Shofiqul Islam; Mahshid Dehghan; Lehana Thabane; Zainab Samaan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 3.240