BACKGROUND: Suicide in hospital settings is a frequently reported sentinel event to the Joint Commission (JC). Since 1995, over 1,000 inpatient deaths by suicide have been reported to the JC; 25% occurred in non-behavioral health settings. Lack of proper "assessment" was the leading root cause for 80% of hospital suicides. This paper describes the "Ask Suicide-Screening Questions to Everyone in Medical Settings (asQ'em)" Quality Improvement Project. We aimed to pilot a suicide screening tool and determine feasibility of screening in terms of prevalence, impact on unit workflow, impact on mental health resources, and patient/nurse acceptance. METHODS: We piloted the asQ'em two-item screening instrument that assesses suicidal thoughts and behaviors, designed specifically for nurses to administer to medical patients. Educational in-services were conducted. A convenience sample of adult patients, 18 years or older, from three selected inpatient units in the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, participated. RESULTS: A total of 331 patients were screened; 13 (4%) patients screened "positive" for suicide risk and received further evaluation. No patient had acute suicidal thoughts or required an observational monitor. Screening took approximately 2 minutes; 87% of patients reported feeling comfortable with screening; 81% of patients, 75% of nurses, and 100% of social workers agreed that all patients in hospitals should be screened for suicide risk. DISCUSSION: Nurses can feasibly screen hospitalized medical/surgical patients for suicide risk with a two-item screening instrument. Patients, nurses, and social workers rated their experience of screening as positive and supported the idea of universal suicide screening in the hospital. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: Suicide in hospital settings is a frequently reported sentinel event to the Joint Commission (JC). Since 1995, over 1,000 inpatient deaths by suicide have been reported to the JC; 25% occurred in non-behavioral health settings. Lack of proper "assessment" was the leading root cause for 80% of hospital suicides. This paper describes the "Ask Suicide-Screening Questions to Everyone in Medical Settings (asQ'em)" Quality Improvement Project. We aimed to pilot a suicide screening tool and determine feasibility of screening in terms of prevalence, impact on unit workflow, impact on mental health resources, and patient/nurse acceptance. METHODS: We piloted the asQ'em two-item screening instrument that assesses suicidal thoughts and behaviors, designed specifically for nurses to administer to medical patients. Educational in-services were conducted. A convenience sample of adult patients, 18 years or older, from three selected inpatient units in the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, participated. RESULTS: A total of 331 patients were screened; 13 (4%) patients screened "positive" for suicide risk and received further evaluation. No patient had acute suicidal thoughts or required an observational monitor. Screening took approximately 2 minutes; 87% of patients reported feeling comfortable with screening; 81% of patients, 75% of nurses, and 100% of social workers agreed that all patients in hospitals should be screened for suicide risk. DISCUSSION: Nurses can feasibly screen hospitalized medical/surgical patients for suicide risk with a two-item screening instrument. Patients, nurses, and social workers rated their experience of screening as positive and supported the idea of universal suicide screening in the hospital. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: M David Rudd; Alan L Berman; Thomas E Joiner; Matthew K Nock; Morton M Silverman; Michael Mandrusiak; Kimberly Van Orden; Tracy Witte Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2006-06
Authors: Lisa M Horowitz; Jeffrey A Bridge; Stephen J Teach; Elizabeth Ballard; Jennifer Klima; Donald L Rosenstein; Elizabeth A Wharff; Katherine Ginnis; Elizabeth Cannon; Paramjit Joshi; Maryland Pao Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2012-12
Authors: Marian E Betz; Sarah A Arias; Matthew Miller; Catherine Barber; Janice A Espinola; Ashley F Sullivan; Anne P Manton; Ivan Miller; Carlos A Camargo; Edwin D Boudreaux Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2015-03-01 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Elizabeth D Ballard; Mary Cwik; Carla L Storr; Mitchell Goldstein; William W Eaton; Holly C Wilcox Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Mary Christensen LeCloux; Laika D Aguinaldo; Elizabeth C Lanzillo; Lisa M Horowitz Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Deborah J Snyder; Elizabeth D Ballard; Ian H Stanley; Erica Ludi; Julie Kohn-Godbout; Maryland Pao; Lisa M Horowitz Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 1.505