Literature DB >> 21907967

Repeatability and reproducibility of biometry and keratometry measurements using a noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer and keratometer.

H John Shammas1, Kenneth J Hoffer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability, reproducibility, or both of the biometry and keratometry measurements obtained by a new optical low-coherence reflectometer and keratometer (Lenstar LS 900, version 1.10; Haag-Streit).
DESIGN: Prospective, comparative, observational study.
SETTING: Private practice, Lynwood, California, and Santa Monica, California. STUDY POPULATION: The measurements of the second eye to be operated on of 37 patients between October 2010 and January 2011 were analyzed. OBSERVATION PROCEDURE: The axial length, central corneal thickness, aqueous depth, anterior chamber depth, crystalline lens thickness, white-to-white corneal diameter, as well as the keratometric readings at the flattest meridian, the steepest meridian, the average K, the amount of astigmatism, and the minus astigmatic cylinder axis were measured before surgery on the patient's first eye and were repeated 1 month later before the second eye surgery. main outcome measures: The repeatability and reproducibility of the biometry and keratometry measurements.
RESULTS: Intrasession repeatability and intersession reproducibility were excellent with a very low coefficient of variation and high interclass correlation coefficients for all measured parameters. Bland-Altman plots show good correlation for axial length measurements (95% limits of agreement ranging from -0.056 to +0.04 mm), anterior chamber depth (-0.22 to +0.18 mm), crystalline lens thickness (-0.21 to +0.27 mm), corneal diameter (-0.28 to +0.24 mm), average keratometric readings (-0.56 to +0.47 diopters), and amount of astigmatism (-0.58 to +0.40 diopters).
CONCLUSIONS: The precision of the measurements obtained by the new optical reflectometer and keratometer is extremely high.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21907967     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of ocular parameters of two biometric measurement devices in highly myopic eyes.

Authors:  Xiao-Xiao Guo; Ran You; Shan-Shan Li; Xiu-Fen Yang; Lu Zhao; Fan Zhang; Yan-Ling Wang; Xi Chen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Evaluation of the repeatability of optical coherence tomography in patients with age-related cataract associated with dry eye.

Authors:  Fen Yang; Ying Chang; Lu Yang; Zhijie Jia; Jiewei Liu; Yan Wang
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.029

3.  Repeatability of on- and off-axis eye length measurements using the lenstar.

Authors:  Krystal L Schulle; David A Berntsen
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Reproducibility of a long-range swept-source optical coherence tomography ocular biometry system and comparison with clinical biometers.

Authors:  Ireneusz Grulkowski; Jonathan J Liu; Jason Y Zhang; Benjamin Potsaid; Vijaysekhar Jayaraman; Alex E Cable; Jay S Duker; James G Fujimoto
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Effects on IOL Power Calculation and Expected Clinical Outcomes of Axial Length Measurements Based on Multiple vs Single Refractive Indices.

Authors:  H John Shammas; Maya C Shammas; Renu V Jivrajka; David L Cooke; Richard Potvin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-04

6.  Factors Influencing Efficacy of Peripheral Corneal Relaxing Incisions during Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Nino Hirnschall; Jörg Wiesinger; Petra Draschl; Oliver Findl
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  Ethnic differences in lens parameters measured by ocular biometry in a cataract surgery population.

Authors:  Dajiang Wang; Behzad Amoozgar; Travis Porco; Zhen Wang; Shan C Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Precision of a new ocular biometer in eyes with cataract using swept source optical coherence tomography combined with Placido-disk corneal topography.

Authors:  Wenwen Wang; Yaxin Miao; Giacomo Savini; Colm McAlinden; Hao Chen; Qingjie Hu; Qinmei Wang; Jinhai Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Comparison of Optical versus Ultrasonic Biometry in Keratoconic Eyes.

Authors:  Yasin Cınar; Abdullah Kürşat Cingü; Muhammed Sahin; Alparslan Sahin; Harun Yüksel; Fatih Mehmet Türkcü; Tuba Cınar; Ihsan Caça
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of ocular parameters obtained by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer compared to the IOLMaster in healthy eyes.

Authors:  Yanjun Hua; Wei Qiu; Qiuyi Xiao; Qiang Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.