Literature DB >> 21907962

Outcome assessment with blinded versus unblinded POP-Q exams.

Danielle D Antosh1, Cheryl B Iglesia, Sonali Vora, Andrew I Sokol.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether blinded and unblinded Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) examinations differ in a randomized trial. STUDY
DESIGN: Blinded POP-Q examinations performed at 3 months and 1 year were compared with unblinded examinations performed by the surgeon in a randomized trial of vaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.
RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included in the study. Correlations between the blinded and unblinded POP-Q points and stages varied from low to moderate (rho = 0.29-0.78). At 3 months, the blinded overall prolapse recurrence rate was 45.3% compared with 39.1% based on unblinded staging (P = .34). At 1 year, the blinded overall recurrence rate was significantly higher than the unblinded recurrence rate: 68.3% vs 53.3% (P = .004). The 1-year blinded anterior wall recurrence rate was also higher than the recurrence based on unblinded staging: 56.7% vs 43.3% (P = .021).
CONCLUSION: Use of unblinded POP-Q staging resulted in underestimation of 1-year overall recurrence after prolapse repair.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21907962     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  5 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of paravaginal defect repair with and without apical suspension: a 6-month postoperative follow-up with MRI, clinical examination, and questionnaires.

Authors:  Louise T S Arenholt; Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen; Karin Glavind; Susanne Greisen; Karl M Bek; Marianne Glavind-Kristensen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Linda Brubaker; Kathryn L Burgio; Holly E Richter; Ingrid Nygaard; Alison C Weidner; Shawn A Menefee; Emily S Lukacz; Peggy Norton; Joseph Schaffer; John N Nguyen; Diane Borello-France; Patricia S Goode; Sharon Jakus-Waldman; Cathie Spino; Lauren Klein Warren; Marie G Gantz; Susan F Meikle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Stasis ulcer and hydronephrosis after severe genital prolapse: a case report.

Authors:  Vito Leanza; Alessandra Di Stefano; Erika Carlotta Paladino; Luca Rivoli; Rosario Emanuele Carlo Distefano; Marco Palumbo
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-28

4.  Functional Outcomes for Incontinence and Prolapse Surgery.

Authors:  Saya Segal; Lily A Arya; Ariana L Smith
Journal:  Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep       Date:  2012-09

Review 5.  Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.