Literature DB >> 21907361

[Long-term outcome of patients treated with spinal cord stimulation for therapeutically refractory failed back surgery syndrome: a retrospective study].

L Abeloos1, O De Witte, R Riquet, T Tuna, N Mathieu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Long-term efficiency (>5 years) of spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome is poorly described in literature. The aims of our study were to evaluate the long-term efficiency and the quality of life of our series of patients with spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome.
METHODS: The data of 55 patients implanted successively in our institution between 1995 and 2005 for failed back surgery syndrome were collected retrospectively. We contacted them for a telephone survey focused on efficiency, quality of life and treatment satisfaction.
RESULTS: An internal pulse generator was placed in 42 patients. Thirty-two of them were contacted to answer our survey with a mean follow-up of 8.3 years. Seventy-five percent of our population reported a pain decrease of greater or equal to 50%. The efficiency of percutaneous leads was reported as 50% for the quadripolars and 83% for the octopolars. The surgical leads evaluations were positive in 70% for 4 × 1 as well as for 4 × 2 leads. We observed a default of low back pain relief in 84% of patients with an incomplete pain relief (59%). The ability to sit, get out of the bed, and climb stairs increased in 75%. The walk was better in 82%. Decrease in drug consumption of greater or equal to 50% was observed in 66%.
CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective study demonstrates a satisfaction of 75% of the patients after 8.3-years follow-up. Spinal cord stimulation is an effective treatment for refractory failed back surgery syndrome.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21907361     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2011.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurochirurgie        ISSN: 0028-3770            Impact factor:   1.553


  6 in total

1.  Spinal cord stimulation modulates cerebral neurobiology: a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study.

Authors:  Maarten Moens; Peter Mariën; Raf Brouns; Jan Poelaert; Ann De Smedt; Ronald Buyl; Steven Droogmans; Peter Van Schuerbeek; Stefan Sunaert; Bart Nuttin
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Neuromodulation in the treatment of postoperative epidural fibrosis: comparison of the extent of epidural fibrosis and the effect of stimulation.

Authors:  V Masopust; J Holubová; P Skalický; R Rokyta; J Fricová; J Lacman; D Netuka; J Patríková; K Janoušková
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 1.881

Review 3.  Neuropathic Pain after Spinal Surgery.

Authors:  Jae Hwan Cho; Jae Hyup Lee; Kwang-Sup Song; Jae-Young Hong
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-08-07

4.  Cannabinoids and spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome refractory pain.

Authors:  Epifanio Mondello; Domenico Quattrone; Luigi Cardia; Giuseppe Bova; Raffaella Mallamace; Alessia A Barbagallo; Cristina Mondello; Carmen Mannucci; Martina Di Pietro; Vincenzo Arcoraci; Gioacchino Calapai
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Dorsal paddle leads implant for spinal cord stimulation through laminotomy with midline structures preservation.

Authors:  Massimo Mearini; Riccardo Bergomi; Pier Paolo Panciani; Roberto Stefini; Giacomo Esposito; G Marco Sicuri; Emanuele Costi; Gabriele Ronchetti; Marco Fontanella
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-12-31

6.  The Results of Treating Failed Back Surgery Syndrome by Adhesiolysis: Comparing the One- and Three-Day Protocols.

Authors:  Behnam Hossieni; Payman Dadkhah; Siamak Moradi; Seyed Masoud Hashemi; Farshad Safdari
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2017-08-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.