BACKGROUND: Previous neuroimaging research indicates that brain atrophy in Huntington disease (HD) begins many years before movement abnormalities become severe enough to warrant diagnosis. Most clinical trials being planned for individuals in the prediagnostic stage of HD propose to use delay of disease onset as the primary outcome measure. Although formulas have been developed based on age and CAG repeat length, to predict when HD motor onset will occur, it would be useful to have additional measures that can improve the accuracy of prediction of disease onset. METHODS: The current study examined magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures of striatum and white matter volume in 85 individuals prospectively followed from pre-HD stage through diagnosable motor onset (incident cases) and 85 individuals individually matched with incident cases on CAG repeat length, sex, and age, who were not diagnosed with HD during the course of the study. RESULTS: Volumes of striatum and white matter were significantly smaller in individuals who would be diagnosed 1 to 4 years following the initial MRI scan, compared with those who would remain in the pre-HD stage. Putamen volume was the measure that best distinguished between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that MRI volumetric measures may be helpful in selecting individuals for future clinical trials in pre-HD where HD motor onset is the primary outcome measure. In planning for multisite clinical trials in pre-HD, investigators may also want to consider using more objective measures, such as MRI volumes, in addition to onset of diagnosable movement disorder, as major outcome measures.
BACKGROUND: Previous neuroimaging research indicates that brain atrophy in Huntington disease (HD) begins many years before movement abnormalities become severe enough to warrant diagnosis. Most clinical trials being planned for individuals in the prediagnostic stage of HD propose to use delay of disease onset as the primary outcome measure. Although formulas have been developed based on age and CAG repeat length, to predict when HD motor onset will occur, it would be useful to have additional measures that can improve the accuracy of prediction of disease onset. METHODS: The current study examined magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures of striatum and white matter volume in 85 individuals prospectively followed from pre-HD stage through diagnosable motor onset (incident cases) and 85 individuals individually matched with incident cases on CAG repeat length, sex, and age, who were not diagnosed with HD during the course of the study. RESULTS: Volumes of striatum and white matter were significantly smaller in individuals who would be diagnosed 1 to 4 years following the initial MRI scan, compared with those who would remain in the pre-HD stage. Putamen volume was the measure that best distinguished between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that MRI volumetric measures may be helpful in selecting individuals for future clinical trials in pre-HD where HD motor onset is the primary outcome measure. In planning for multisite clinical trials in pre-HD, investigators may also want to consider using more objective measures, such as MRI volumes, in addition to onset of diagnosable movement disorder, as major outcome measures.
Authors: Elizabeth H Aylward; Peggy C Nopoulos; Christopher A Ross; Douglas R Langbehn; Ronald K Pierson; James A Mills; Hans J Johnson; Vincent A Magnotta; Andrew R Juhl; Jane S Paulsen Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2010-09-30 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: E H Aylward; B F Sparks; K M Field; V Yallapragada; B D Shpritz; A Rosenblatt; J Brandt; L M Gourley; K Liang; H Zhou; R L Margolis; C A Ross Journal: Neurology Date: 2004-07-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: M Duyao; C Ambrose; R Myers; A Novelletto; F Persichetti; M Frontali; S Folstein; C Ross; M Franz; M Abbott Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1993-08 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: H D Rosas; W J Koroshetz; Y I Chen; C Skeuse; M Vangel; M E Cudkowicz; K Caplan; K Marek; L J Seidman; N Makris; B G Jenkins; J M Goldstein Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-05-27 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: G J Harris; G D Pearlson; C E Peyser; E H Aylward; J Roberts; P E Barta; G A Chase; S E Folstein Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 1992-01 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: S E Starkstein; J Brandt; S Folstein; M Strauss; M L Berthier; G D Pearlson; D Wong; A McDonnell; M Folstein Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 1988-10 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Joseph J Shaffer; Ali Ghayoor; Jeffrey D Long; Regina Eun-Young Kim; Spencer Lourens; Lauren J O'Donnell; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Yogesh Rathi; Vincent Magnotta; Jane S Paulsen; Hans J Johnson Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Jane S Paulsen; Jeffrey D Long; Christopher A Ross; Deborah L Harrington; Cheryl J Erwin; Janet K Williams; Holly James Westervelt; Hans J Johnson; Elizabeth H Aylward; Ying Zhang; H Jeremy Bockholt; Roger A Barker Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2014-11-03 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Shafik N Wassef; John Wemmie; Casey P Johnson; Hans Johnson; Jane S Paulsen; Jeffrey D Long; Vincent A Magnotta Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2015-03-29 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Hosung Kim; Ji-Hoon Kim; Katherine L Possin; Joseph Winer; Michael D Geschwind; Duan Xu; Christopher P Hess Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Jed T Elison; Jason J Wolff; Debra C Heimer; Sarah J Paterson; Hongbin Gu; Heather C Hazlett; Martin Styner; Guido Gerig; Joseph Piven Journal: Dev Sci Date: 2012-12-20