OBJECTIVE: As therapeutics are being developed to target the underlying neuropathology of Huntington disease, interest is increasing in methodologies for conducting clinical trials in the prodromal phase. This study was designed to examine the potential utility of structural MRI measures as outcome measures for such trials. METHODS: Data are presented from 211 prodromal individuals and 60 controls, scanned both at baseline and at the 2-year follow-up. Prodromal participants were divided into groups based on proximity to estimated onset of diagnosable clinical disease: far (>15 years from estimated onset), mid (9-15 years) and near (<9 years). Volumetric measurements of caudate, putamen, total striatum, globus pallidus, thalamus, total grey and white matter and cerebrospinal fluid were performed. RESULTS: All prodromal groups showed a faster rate of atrophy than controls in striatum, total brain and cerebral white matter (especially in the frontal lobe). Neither prodromal participants nor controls showed any significant longitudinal change in cortex (either total cortical grey or within individual lobes). When normal age-related atrophy (ie, change observed in the control group) was taken into account, there was more statistically significant disease-related atrophy in white matter than in striatum. CONCLUSION: Measures of volume change in striatum and white-matter volume, particularly in the frontal lobe, may serve as excellent outcome measures for future clinical trials in prodromal Huntington disease. Clinical trials using white matter or striatal volume change as an outcome measure will be most efficient if the sample is restricted to individuals who are within 15 years of estimated onset of diagnosable disease.
OBJECTIVE: As therapeutics are being developed to target the underlying neuropathology of Huntington disease, interest is increasing in methodologies for conducting clinical trials in the prodromal phase. This study was designed to examine the potential utility of structural MRI measures as outcome measures for such trials. METHODS: Data are presented from 211 prodromal individuals and 60 controls, scanned both at baseline and at the 2-year follow-up. Prodromal participants were divided into groups based on proximity to estimated onset of diagnosable clinical disease: far (>15 years from estimated onset), mid (9-15 years) and near (<9 years). Volumetric measurements of caudate, putamen, total striatum, globus pallidus, thalamus, total grey and white matter and cerebrospinal fluid were performed. RESULTS: All prodromal groups showed a faster rate of atrophy than controls in striatum, total brain and cerebral white matter (especially in the frontal lobe). Neither prodromal participants nor controls showed any significant longitudinal change in cortex (either total cortical grey or within individual lobes). When normal age-related atrophy (ie, change observed in the control group) was taken into account, there was more statistically significant disease-related atrophy in white matter than in striatum. CONCLUSION: Measures of volume change in striatum and white-matter volume, particularly in the frontal lobe, may serve as excellent outcome measures for future clinical trials in prodromal Huntington disease. Clinical trials using white matter or striatal volume change as an outcome measure will be most efficient if the sample is restricted to individuals who are within 15 years of estimated onset of diagnosable disease.
Authors: H Diana Rosas; David S Tuch; Nathanael D Hevelone; Alexandra K Zaleta; Mark Vangel; Steven M Hersch; David H Salat Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Stephanie Powell; Vincent A Magnotta; Hans Johnson; Vamsi K Jammalamadaka; Ronald Pierson; Nancy C Andreasen Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-08-22 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Kevin M Biglan; Christopher A Ross; Douglas R Langbehn; Elizabeth H Aylward; Julie C Stout; Sarah Queller; Noelle E Carlozzi; Kevin Duff; Leigh J Beglinger; Jane S Paulsen Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Sarah J Tabrizi; Douglas R Langbehn; Blair R Leavitt; Raymund Ac Roos; Alexandra Durr; David Craufurd; Christopher Kennard; Stephen L Hicks; Nick C Fox; Rachael I Scahill; Beth Borowsky; Allan J Tobin; H Diana Rosas; Hans Johnson; Ralf Reilmann; Bernhard Landwehrmeyer; Julie C Stout Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2009-07-29 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Kurt E Weaver; Todd L Richards; Olivia Liang; Mercy Y Laurino; Ali Samii; Elizabeth H Aylward Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 5.330
Authors: Caroline K Jurgens; Lotte van de Wiel; Ad C G M van Es; Yvette M Grimbergen; Marie-Noëlle W Witjes-Ané; Jeroen van der Grond; Huub A M Middelkoop; Raymund A C Roos Journal: J Neurol Date: 2008-12-08 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Susie M D Henley; Edward J Wild; Nicola Z Hobbs; Chris Frost; David G MacManus; Roger A Barker; Nick C Fox; Sarah J Tabrizi Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2009-04-30 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: J S Paulsen; D R Langbehn; J C Stout; E Aylward; C A Ross; M Nance; M Guttman; S Johnson; M MacDonald; L J Beglinger; K Duff; E Kayson; K Biglan; I Shoulson; D Oakes; M Hayden Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2007-12-20 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: D S Adnan Majid; Adam R Aron; Wesley Thompson; Sarah Sheldon; Samar Hamza; Diederick Stoffers; Dominic Holland; Jody Goldstein; Jody Corey-Bloom; Anders M Dale Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2011-09-19 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Miriam A Hickey; Chunni Zhu; Vera Medvedeva; Nicholas R Franich; Michael S Levine; Marie-Françoise Chesselet Journal: Mol Cell Neurosci Date: 2011-10-20 Impact factor: 4.314
Authors: Paul G Unschuld; Richard A E Edden; Aaron Carass; Xinyang Liu; Megan Shanahan; Xin Wang; Kenichi Oishi; Jason Brandt; Susan S Bassett; Graham W Redgrave; Russell L Margolis; Peter C M van Zijl; Peter B Barker; Christopher A Ross Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2012-05-30 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Wai Yen Loh; Alan Connelly; Jeanie L Y Cheong; Alicia J Spittle; Jian Chen; Christopher Adamson; Zohra M Ahmadzai; Lillian Gabra Fam; Sandra Rees; Katherine J Lee; Lex W Doyle; Peter J Anderson; Deanne K Thompson Journal: Neuroinformatics Date: 2016-01
Authors: Tiffany C Hadzi; Audrey E Hendricks; Jeanne C Latourelle; Kathryn L Lunetta; L Adrienne Cupples; Tammy Gillis; Jayalakshmi Srinidhi Mysore; James F Gusella; Marcy E MacDonald; Richard H Myers; Jean-Paul Vonsattel Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Ellen van der Plas; Douglas R Langbehn; Amy L Conrad; Timothy R Koscik; Alexander Tereshchenko; Eric A Epping; Vincent A Magnotta; Peggy C Nopoulos Journal: Neurology Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Deborah L Harrington; Jeffrey D Long; Sally Durgerian; Lyla Mourany; Katherine Koenig; Aaron Bonner-Jackson; Jane S Paulsen; Stephen M Rao Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 10.338