Literature DB >> 21905896

Retention of implant-supported overdenture with bar/clip and stud attachment designs.

Omid Savabi1, Farahnaz Nejatidanesh, Forough Yordshahian.   

Abstract

The degree of retention for overdenture attachments depends on design, location, and alignment of supporting dental implants and the type of attachments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the retention of an implant-supported overdenture with different attachment designs. An overdenture was made on an edentulous mandibular model with 2 ITI implants (4.1 × 10 mm) in the symphyseal region. Five specimens of 8 attachment designs with corresponding abutments and superstructures were used: ITI regular Dolder bar with 1 metal clip, ITI regular Dolder bar with cantilever and 3 metal clips, Hader bar with 1 plastic clip, Hader bar with cantilever and 3 plastic clips, Sphero block abutment with Rhein plastic caps (green, white, and pink), and retentive anchor with ITI elliptical matrix. The attachments' housings were interchangeable and fixed into the overdenture through nut and screw. The overdenture attachments were subjected to 8 consecutive pulls on a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 50.8 mm/min in the vertical and posteroanterior directions. Analysis of variance and Duncan tests were used to determine differences between mean retention values (α = .05). The highest average value retention was recorded for the ITI Dolder bar with cantilever and 3 metal clips in both the vertical and posteroanterior directions, respectively (P < .05). The Rhein pink caps had the lowest retention in the posteroanterior direction (P < .05). Retention decreased over the course of consecutive pulls for all attachments in both directions. The type, number, and placement of attachments affect the retention of implant-supported mandibular overdentures.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21905896     DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  6 in total

1.  Retention of bar clip attachment for mandibular implant overdenture.

Authors:  Hossam I Nassar; Medhat Sameh Abdelaziz
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.747

2.  Rehabilitation of an Extremely Edentulous Atrophic Maxilla with a Pseudoskeletal Class III Relationship.

Authors:  Gregor-Georg Zafiropoulos; Tae Ho Yoon; Moosa Abuzayda
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2019-04-21

3.  In Vitro Effects of Cyclic Dislodgement on Retentive Properties of Various Titanium-Based Dental Implant Overdentures Attachment System.

Authors:  Tae-Yun Kang; Jee-Hwan Kim; Kwang-Mahn Kim; Jae-Sung Kwon
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  How the initial retentive force of implant-supported overdentures can be affected with splinted and unsplinted attachments systems.

Authors:  Farahnaz Nejatidanesh; Omid Savabi; Ghazal Savabi; Mehdi Razavi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2021-12-10

5.  A Comparison of Biomechanical Properties of Implant-Retained Overdenture Based on Precision Attachment Type.

Authors:  Małgorzata Idzior-Haufa; Agnieszka A Pilarska; Wiesław Hędzelek; Piotr Boniecki; Krzysztof Pilarski; Barbara Dorocka-Bobkowska
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Oral Rehabilitation of Oral Cancer Patients Using Zygomatic Implant-Supported Maxillary Prostheses with Magnetic Attachment: Three Case Reports.

Authors:  Hisashi Ozaki; Hiromasa Sakurai; Yukie Yoshida; Hideyuki Yamanouchi; Mitsuyoshi Iino
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2018-09-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.