Literature DB >> 21905444

Opportunities and challenges of expanded criteria organs in liver and kidney transplantation as a response to organ shortage.

Harvey Solomon1.   

Abstract

In 1989, there were 19,000 patients on the UNOS (United Network of Organ Sharing) wait list for organs compared to 110,000 today. Without an equivalent increase in donors, the patients awaiting these organs for transplant face increasing severity of illness and risk of dying without receiving a transplant. This disparity in supply and demand has led to acceptance of organs with lower than expected success rates compared to previous standard donors variously defined as extended criteria donors in order to increase transplantation. The reluctance to wider use of these types of organs is based on the less than expected transplant center graft and patient survival results associated with their use, as well as the increased resources required to care for the patients who receive these organs. The benefits need to be compared to the survival of not receiving a transplant and remaining on the waiting list rather than on outcomes of receiving a standard donor. A lack of a systematic risk outcomes adjustment is one of the most important factors preventing more extensive utilization as transplant centers are held to patient and graft survival statistics as a performance measure by multiple regulatory organizations and insurers. Newer classification systems of such donors may allow a more systematic approach to analyzing the specific risks to individualized patients. Due to changes in donor policies across the country, there has been an increase in Extended Criteria Donors (ECD) organs procured by organ procurement organizations (OPO) but their uneven acceptance by the transplant centers has contributed to an increase in discards and organs not being used. This is one of the reasons that wider sharing of organs is currently receiving much attention. Transplanting ECD organs presents unique challenges and innovative approaches to achieve satisfactory results. Improved logistics and information technology combined strategies for improving donor quality with may prevent discards while insuring maximal benefit. Transplant centers, organ procurement organizations, third party payers and government agencies all must be involved in maximizing the potential for ECD organs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21905444      PMCID: PMC6188417     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mo Med        ISSN: 0026-6620


  32 in total

1.  Short- and long-term outcomes after steatotic liver transplantation.

Authors:  M B Majella Doyle; Neeta Vachharajani; Jason R Wellen; Christopher D Anderson; Jeffrey A Lowell; Surendra Shenoy; Elizabeth M Brunt; William C Chapman
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2010-07

Review 2.  High infectious risk donors: what are the risks and when are they too high?

Authors:  Lauren M Kucirka; Andrew L Singer; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 3.  Challenges in the counseling and management of older kidney transplant candidates.

Authors:  Gabriel Danovitch; Eric Savransky
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 1999-2008.

Authors:  A S Klein; E E Messersmith; L E Ratner; R Kochik; P K Baliga; A O Ojo
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Effect of waiting time on renal transplant outcome.

Authors:  H U Meier-Kriesche; F K Port; A O Ojo; S M Rudich; J A Hanson; D M Cibrik; A B Leichtman; B Kaplan
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  Survival in recipients of marginal cadaveric donor kidneys compared with other recipients and wait-listed transplant candidates.

Authors:  Akinlolu O Ojo; Julie A Hanson; Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche; Chike N Okechukwu; Robert A Wolfe; Alan B Leichtman; Lawrence Y Agodoa; Bruce Kaplan; Friedrich K Port
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: an approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors.

Authors:  Friedrich K Port; Jennifer L Bragg-Gresham; Robert A Metzger; Dawn M Dykstra; Brenda W Gillespie; Eric W Young; Francis L Delmonico; James J Wynn; Robert M Merion; Robert A Wolfe; Philip J Held
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Influence of pulsatile perfusion preservation on outcomes in kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors.

Authors:  Robert J Stratta; Phillip S Moore; Alan C Farney; Jeffrey Rogers; Erica L Hartmann; Amber Reeves-Daniel; Michael D Gautreaux; Samy S Iskandar; Patricia L Adams
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Survival benefit-based deceased-donor liver allocation.

Authors:  D E Schaubel; M K Guidinger; S W Biggins; J D Kalbfleisch; E A Pomfret; P Sharma; R M Merion
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 10.  A systematic review of kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors.

Authors:  Julio Pascual; Javier Zamora; John D Pirsch
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 8.860

View more
  2 in total

1.  The management of acute cholecystitis in chronic hemodialysis patients: percutaneous cholecystostomy versus cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yusuf Gunay; Huseyin Yuce Bircan; Ertan Emek; Halime Cevik; Gulum Altaca; Gokhan Moray
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Efficacy and Safety Outcomes of Extended Criteria Donor Kidneys by Subtype: Subgroup Analysis of BENEFIT-EXT at 7 Years After Transplant.

Authors:  S Florman; T Becker; B Bresnahan; A Chevaile-Ramos; D Carvalho; G Grannas; F Muehlbacher; P J O'Connell; H U Meier-Kriesche; C P Larsen
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 8.086

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.