Literature DB >> 19341419

Survival benefit-based deceased-donor liver allocation.

D E Schaubel1, M K Guidinger, S W Biggins, J D Kalbfleisch, E A Pomfret, P Sharma, R M Merion.   

Abstract

Currently, patients awaiting deceased-donor liver transplantation are prioritized by medical urgency. Specifically, wait-listed chronic liver failure patients are sequenced in decreasing order of Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. To maximize lifetime gained through liver transplantation, posttransplant survival should be considered in prioritizing liver waiting list candidates. We evaluate a survival benefit based system for allocating deceased-donor livers to chronic liver failure patients. Under the proposed system, at the time of offer, the transplant survival benefit score would be computed for each patient active on the waiting list. The proposed score is based on the difference in 5-year mean lifetime (with vs. without a liver transplant) and accounts for patient and donor characteristics. The rank correlation between benefit score and MELD score is 0.67. There is great overlap in the distribution of benefit scores across MELD categories, since waiting list mortality is significantly affected by several factors. Simulation results indicate that over 2000 life-years would be saved per year if benefit-based allocation was implemented. The shortage of donor livers increases the need to maximize the life-saving capacity of procured livers. Allocation of deceased-donor livers to chronic liver failure patients would be improved by prioritizing patients by transplant survival benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19341419      PMCID: PMC2895923          DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02571.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  19 in total

1.  MELD and PELD: application of survival models to liver allocation.

Authors:  R H Wiesner; S V McDiarmid; P S Kamath; E B Edwards; M Malinchoc; W K Kremers; R A Krom; W R Kim
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Correcting for noncompliance and dependent censoring in an AIDS Clinical Trial with inverse probability of censoring weighted (IPCW) log-rank tests.

Authors:  J M Robins; D M Finkelstein
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Simulating the allocation of organs for transplantation.

Authors:  David Thompson; Larry Waisanen; Robert Wolfe; Robert M Merion; Keith McCullough; Ann Rodgers
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2004-11

Review 4.  A systematic review of the performance of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) in the setting of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Evangelos Cholongitas; Laura Marelli; Vibhakorn Shusang; Marco Senzolo; Keith Rolles; David Patch; Andrew K Burroughs
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.799

5.  Partly conditional survival models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Pretransplant renal function predicts survival in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  Satheesh Nair; Sumita Verma; Paul J Thuluvath
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  Survival in recipients of marginal cadaveric donor kidneys compared with other recipients and wait-listed transplant candidates.

Authors:  Akinlolu O Ojo; Julie A Hanson; Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche; Chike N Okechukwu; Robert A Wolfe; Alan B Leichtman; Lawrence Y Agodoa; Bruce Kaplan; Friedrich K Port
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 10.121

8.  Development of the new lung allocation system in the United States.

Authors:  T M Egan; S Murray; R T Bustami; T H Shearon; K P McCullough; L B Edwards; M A Coke; E R Garrity; S C Sweet; D A Heiney; F L Grover
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  The survival benefit of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Robert M Merion; Douglas E Schaubel; Dawn M Dykstra; Richard B Freeman; Friedrich K Port; Robert A Wolfe
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index.

Authors:  S Feng; N P Goodrich; J L Bragg-Gresham; D M Dykstra; J D Punch; M A DebRoy; S M Greenstein; R M Merion
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.086

View more
  70 in total

1.  Liver transplantation: Toward a unified allocation system.

Authors:  Ali Zarrinpar; Ronald W Busuttil
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Transplantation: Allocation of liver transplants-a road to consensus.

Authors:  John P Roberts
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 3.  Development of organ-specific donor risk indices.

Authors:  Sanjeev K Akkina; Sumeet K Asrani; Yi Peng; Peter Stock; W Ray Kim; Ajay K Israni
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.799

4.  MELD as a metric for survival benefit of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Xun Luo; Joseph Leanza; Allan B Massie; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Christine E Haugen; Sommer E Gentry; Shane E Ottmann; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Donor race does not predict graft failure after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Sumeet K Asrani; Young-Suk Lim; Terry M Therneau; Rachel A Pedersen; Julie Heimbach; W Ray Kim
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Futility and rationing in liver retransplantation: when and how can we say no?

Authors:  Scott W Biggins
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 7.  Prioritization for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Evangelos Cholongitas; Giacomo Germani; Andrew K Burroughs
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 46.802

8.  Prospective Assessment of Liver Function by an Enzymatic Liver Function Test to Estimate Short-Term Survival in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Maximilian Jara; Tomasz Dziodzio; Maciej Malinowski; Katja Lüttgert; Radoslav Nikolov; Paul Viktor Ritschl; Robert Öllinger; Johann Pratschke; Martin Stockmann
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Living donor liver transplantation for high model for end-stage liver disease score: What have we learned?

Authors:  Hany Dabbous; Mohammad Sakr; Sara Abdelhakam; Iman Montasser; Mohamed Bahaa; Hany Said; Mahmoud El-Meteini
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-08-08

10.  An examination of liver offers to candidates on the liver transplant wait-list.

Authors:  Jennifer Cindy Lai; Sandy Feng; John Paul Roberts
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 22.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.