Salvatore Docimo1,2, Konstantinos Spaniolas3, Michael Svestka3, Andrew T Bates3, Samer Sbayi3, Jessica Schnur3, Mark Talamini3, Aurora D Pryor3. 1. Department of Surgery, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA. Salvatore.docimo@stonybrookmedicine.ed. 2. Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced GI Surgery, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA. Salvatore.docimo@stonybrookmedicine.ed. 3. Department of Surgery, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To quantify the impact of body mass index (BMI) on surgical site infection (SSI) following abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) using component separation techniques and attempt to identify obesity-related targets, such as BMI, that can be potentially used to guide preoperative patient optimization. Though AWR has established perioperative outcomes for hernia repair, the applicability in the obese population is not well established. METHODS: The 2005-2013 ACS-NSQIP participant use file was reviewed to compare SSI, severe, and overall morbidity in non-emergent AWR patients based on BMI. Multivariable logistic regression was used to control for patient demographics and comorbidities. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals were reported. RESULTS: We identified 4488 patients. The average BMI was 32.76 ± 7.70 kg/m2. The majority of cases (76.8%) had wound classified as clean. The SSI rate significantly increased at a BMI of ≥ 35 kg/m2 compared to < 35 (18.5% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.0001). There was no significant different in SSI rate between BMI 35-40 and > 40. After controlling for differences in baseline characteristics and wound classification, BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 was independently associated with SSI (OR 1.47, 1.21-1.78), minor complications (OR 1.65, 1.41-1.94), major complications (OR 1.91, 1.60-2.27), re-operation (OR 1.59, 1.23-2.05), and hospital re-admission (OR 1.93, 1.23-3.02). CONCLUSION: There is a significant increase in SSI and other perioperative complications in patients with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 undergoing AWR. Higher BMI is also independently associated with higher resource utilization in this patient population. Severely obese patients in need of AWR may benefit from a structured preoperative weight loss intervention.
BACKGROUND: To quantify the impact of body mass index (BMI) on surgical site infection (SSI) following abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) using component separation techniques and attempt to identify obesity-related targets, such as BMI, that can be potentially used to guide preoperative patient optimization. Though AWR has established perioperative outcomes for hernia repair, the applicability in the obese population is not well established. METHODS: The 2005-2013 ACS-NSQIP participant use file was reviewed to compare SSI, severe, and overall morbidity in non-emergent AWR patients based on BMI. Multivariable logistic regression was used to control for patient demographics and comorbidities. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals were reported. RESULTS: We identified 4488 patients. The average BMI was 32.76 ± 7.70 kg/m2. The majority of cases (76.8%) had wound classified as clean. The SSI rate significantly increased at a BMI of ≥ 35 kg/m2 compared to < 35 (18.5% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.0001). There was no significant different in SSI rate between BMI 35-40 and > 40. After controlling for differences in baseline characteristics and wound classification, BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 was independently associated with SSI (OR 1.47, 1.21-1.78), minor complications (OR 1.65, 1.41-1.94), major complications (OR 1.91, 1.60-2.27), re-operation (OR 1.59, 1.23-2.05), and hospital re-admission (OR 1.93, 1.23-3.02). CONCLUSION: There is a significant increase in SSI and other perioperative complications in patients with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 undergoing AWR. Higher BMI is also independently associated with higher resource utilization in this patient population. Severely obesepatients in need of AWR may benefit from a structured preoperative weight loss intervention.
Authors: Yuri W Novitsky; Mojtaba Fayezizadeh; Arnab Majumder; Ruel Neupane; Heidi L Elliott; Sean B Orenstein Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Kevin C Soares; Pablo A Baltodano; Caitlin W Hicks; Carisa M Cooney; Israel O Olorundare; Peter Cornell; Karen Burce; Frederic E Eckhauser Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Stefan Stremitzer; Thomas Bachleitner-Hofmann; Bernhard Gradl; Matthias Gruenbeck; Barbara Bachleitner-Hofmann; Martina Mittlboeck; Michael Bergmann Journal: World J Surg Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: T S de Vries Reilingh; H van Goor; J A Charbon; C Rosman; E J Hesselink; G J van der Wilt; R P Bleichrodt Journal: World J Surg Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 3.352