Literature DB >> 21904142

Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of fecal incontinence.

Derek J Boyle1, Jamie Murphy, Mayoni L Gooneratne, Karyn Grimmer, Marion E Allison, Christopher L H Chan, Norman S Williams.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sacral nerve stimulation has been shown to be an effective treatment for fecal incontinence and early studies reported success rates of 67% to 100%. However, "success" has been arbitrarily set at a 50% reduction in symptoms, and data are rarely reported with "intention to treat."
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the true efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence compared with the published literature.
DESIGN: This prospective 5-year study was conducted to assess 50 patients with fecal incontinence treated with sacral nerve stimulation. All analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. SETTINGS: This study took place in a single tertiary referral colorectal department. PATIENTS: Fifty consecutive patients with fecal incontinence refractory to conservative management were included in the study.
INTERVENTIONS: The interventions performed were temporary evaluation with or without permanent sacral nerve stimulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: : Primary outcome measures were 1) attainment of continence, 2) reduction in fecal incontinence episodes, 3) improvement in Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence scores, and 4) improvement in the ability to defer defecation.
RESULTS: Thirteen patients (26%) did not respond at the temporary evaluation stage or were dissatisfied with the result. Ten further patients (20%) did not achieve a 50% reduction in symptoms following permanent implantation. The median follow-up was 17 months (range, 2-55), at which time 27 patients (54%) experienced a 50% or more reduction in symptoms, including 13 (26%) who achieved apparent continence. Median fecal incontinence episodes per fortnight reduced from 14 (range, 0-53) to 2 (range, 0-20; P < .0001). Median Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence scores reduced from 15 (range, 3-20) to 8 (range, 0-17; P < .0001). The ability to defer defecation improved significantly (P < .0001). These results compare favorably with the published literature. LIMITATIONS: Quality of life was not assessed.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that sacral nerve stimulation can be an effective treatment for patients with fecal incontinence; however, when analyzed by intention to treat, the symptoms of fecal incontinence continue in the majority (74%) of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21904142     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182270af1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  16 in total

1.  Office-based management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Vanessa C Costilla; Amy E Foxx-Orenstein; Anita P Mayer; Michael D Crowell
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-07

Review 2.  [Sacral nerve modulation in coloproctology].

Authors:  M Gelos; M Niedergethmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Adverse events of sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence reported to the federal drug administration.

Authors:  Klaus Bielefeldt
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-05-06

Review 4.  Current status: new technologies for the treatment of patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Andreas M Kaiser; Guy R Orangio; Massarat Zutshi; Suraj Alva; Tracy L Hull; Peter W Marcello; David A Margolin; Janice F Rafferty; W Donald Buie; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Is sacral neuromodulation here to stay? Clinical outcomes of a new treatment for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Bobby L Johnson; Adam Abodeely; Martha A Ferguson; Bradley R Davis; Janice F Rafferty; Ian M Paquette
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Prospective clinical audit of two neuromodulatory treatments for fecal incontinence: sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS).

Authors:  Alexander Hotouras; Jamie Murphy; Marion Allison; Anne Curry; Norman S Williams; Charles H Knowles; Christopher L Chan
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  A retrospective review of 1495 patients with obstetric anal sphincter injuries referred for assessment of function and endoanal ultrasonography.

Authors:  G P Thomas; L E Gould; F Casunuran; D A Kumar
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Translumbar and transsacral magnetic neurostimulation for the assessment of neuropathy in fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Satish S C Rao; Enrique Coss-Adame; Kasaya Tantiphlachiva; Ashok Attaluri; Jose Remes-Troche
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence improves symptoms, quality of life and patients' satisfaction: results of a monocentric series of 119 patients.

Authors:  Henri Damon; Xavier Barth; Sabine Roman; François Mion
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence and "low anterior resection syndrome" following neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  O Schwandner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.