Literature DB >> 21902532

Expanding DNA diagnostic panel testing: is more better?

Eric W Klee1, Nicole L Hoppman-Chaney, Matthew J Ferber.   

Abstract

During the last 25 years, a small number of meaningful DNA-based diagnostic tests have been available to aid in the diagnosis and subsequent treatment of heritable disorders. These tests have targeted a limited number of genes and are often ordered in serial testing strategies in which results from one preliminary test dictate the subsequent test orders. This approach can be both time and resource intensive when a patient requires several genes to be sequenced. Recently, there has been much discussion regarding how 'massively parallel' or 'next-generation' DNA sequencing will impact clinical care. While the technology promises to reduce the cost of sequencing an entire human genome to less than US$1000, one must question the diagnostic utility of complete genome sequencing for routine clinical testing, given the many interpretive challenges posed by this approach. At present, it appears next-generation DNA sequencing may provide the greatest benefit to routine clinical testing by enabling comprehensive multigene panel sequencing. This should provide an advantage over traditional Sanger-based sequencing strategies while limiting the total test output to sets to genes with known diagnostic value. This article will discuss the current and near future state of clinical testing approaches and explore what challenges must be addressed in order to extract diagnostic value from whole-exome sequencing and whole-genome sequencing, using hereditary colon cancer as an example.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21902532     DOI: 10.1586/erm.11.58

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1473-7159            Impact factor:   5.225


  19 in total

1.  Reassessment of Genomic Sequence Variation to Harmonize Interpretation for Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Kathryn B Garber; Lisa M Vincent; John J Alexander; Lora J H Bean; Sherri Bale; Madhuri Hegde
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Evaluation of laboratory perspectives on hereditary cancer panels.

Authors:  Jessica Stoll; Scott M Weissman; Nicole Hook; Christina Selkirk; Amy Knight Johnson; Anna Newlin; Kristen J Vogel Postula
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 3.  Towards precision nephrology: the opportunities and challenges of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Jordan G Nestor; Emily E Groopman; Ali G Gharavi
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 4.  DNA markers in molecular diagnostics for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ying-Hsiu Su; Selena Y Lin; Wei Song; Surbhi Jain
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.225

5.  Acceptability of, and Information Needs Regarding, Next-Generation Sequencing in People Tested for Hereditary Cancer: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Ben Storey; Veronica Quinn; Belinda Rahman; Lesley Andrews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Defining the Clinical Value of a Genomic Diagnosis in the Era of Next-Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Natasha T Strande; Jonathan S Berg
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 8.929

7.  Risk Assessment and Genetic Testing for Inherited Gastrointestinal Syndromes.

Authors:  Jessica Stoll; Sonia S Kupfer
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2019-09

8.  Genomic Testing: a Genetic Counselor's Personal Reflection on Three Years of Consenting and Testing.

Authors:  Julia Wynn
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Managing Expectational Language: Translational genetic professionals consider the clinical potential of next-generation sequencing technologies.

Authors:  Pei P Koay; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  New Genet Soc       Date:  2014-06-01

10.  How should we discuss genetic testing with women newly diagnosed with breast cancer? Design and implementation of a randomized controlled trial of two models of delivering education about treatment-focused genetic testing to younger women newly diagnosed with breast cancer.

Authors:  Kaaren J Watts; Bettina Meiser; Gillian Mitchell; Judy Kirk; Christobel Saunders; Michelle Peate; Jessica Duffy; Patrick J Kelly; Margaret Gleeson; Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Belinda Rahman; Michael Friedlander; Kathy Tucker
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.