Literature DB >> 21902225

The free energy landscape analysis of protein (FIP35) folding dynamics.

Sergei V Krivov1.   

Abstract

A fundamental problem in the analysis of protein folding and other complex reactions is the determination of the reaction free energy landscape. The current experimental techniques lack the necessary spatial and temporal resolution to construct such landscapes. The properties of the landscapes can be probed only indirectly. Simulation, assuming that it reproduces the experimental dynamics, can provide the necessary spatial and temporal resolution. It is, arguably, the only way for direct rigorous construction of the quantitatively accurate free energy landscapes. Here, such landscape is constructed from the equilibrium folding simulation of FIP35 protein reported by Shaw et al. Science 2010, 330, 341-346. For the dynamics to be accurately described as diffusion on the free energy landscape, the choice of reaction coordinates is crucial. The reaction coordinate used here is such that the dynamics projected on it is diffusive, so the description is consistent and accurate. The obtained landscape suggests an alternative interpretation of the simulation, markedly different from that of Shaw et al. In particular, FIP35 is not an incipient downhill folder, it folds via a populated on-pathway intermediate separated by high free energy barriers; the high free energy barriers rather than landscape roughness are a major determinant of the rates for conformational transitions; the preexponential factor of folding kinetics 1/k(0) ∼ 10 ns rather than 1 μs.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21902225     DOI: 10.1021/jp208585r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  19 in total

1.  Dominant folding pathways of a WW domain.

Authors:  Silvio A Beccara; Tatjana Škrbić; Roberto Covino; Pietro Faccioli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Simple few-state models reveal hidden complexity in protein folding.

Authors:  Kyle A Beauchamp; Robert McGibbon; Yu-Shan Lin; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Diffusion along the splitting/commitment probability reaction coordinate.

Authors:  Alexander M Berezhkovskii; Attila Szabo
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 4.  To milliseconds and beyond: challenges in the simulation of protein folding.

Authors:  Thomas J Lane; Diwakar Shukla; Kyle A Beauchamp; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 6.809

5.  The Role of Electrostatic Interactions in Folding of β-Proteins.

Authors:  Caitlin M Davis; R Brian Dyer
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Comparing Fast Pressure Jump and Temperature Jump Protein Folding Experiments and Simulations.

Authors:  Anna Jean Wirth; Yanxin Liu; Maxim B Prigozhin; Klaus Schulten; Martin Gruebele
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Characterization of folding mechanisms of Trp-cage and WW-domain by network analysis of simulations with a hybrid-resolution model.

Authors:  Wei Han; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  High-Resolution Mapping of the Folding Transition State of a WW Domain.

Authors:  Kapil Dave; Marcus Jäger; Houbi Nguyen; Jeffery W Kelly; Martin Gruebele
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Parallel folding pathways of Fip35 WW domain explained by infrared spectra and their computer simulation.

Authors:  Laura Zanetti-Polzi; Caitlin M Davis; Martin Gruebele; R Brian Dyer; Andrea Amadei; Isabella Daidone
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.124

10.  Comparison between Mean Forces and Swarms-of-Trajectories String Methods.

Authors:  Luca Maragliano; Benoît Roux; Eric Vanden-Eijnden
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.