Literature DB >> 21901378

Using mixed methods research to explore the effect of an adaptation exercise on general population valuations of health states.

Helen M McTaggart-Cowan1, Alicia O'Cathain, Aki Tsuchiya, John E Brazier.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To understand the effect of an adaptation exercise (AE) on general population values for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) states.
METHODS: A sequential mixed methods design was employed: an analysis of a dataset to develop RA states for valuing in later phases of the study; a qualitative interview study with members of the general population to identify how an AE affected valuing of the RA states and to help design a questionnaire for the final phase; and a quantitative quasi-experimental study to identify factors that influence change in values after being informed about adaptation.
RESULTS: Three RA states were developed using Rasch and cluster analyses. Participants in the qualitative phase identified a range of ways in which information about adaptation affected their values. For example, they realized they could adapt to RA because their family and friends who had RA, or similar conditions, could cope. A 25-item questionnaire was developed and used during the final phase to identify that younger and healthier individuals were more likely to increase their values after being informed about disease adaptation. The qualitative findings were revisited and found to support the quantitative results.
CONCLUSIONS: This approach facilitated understanding of whether and how an AE affected valuing of health states. Each phase affected the next phase of the study, leading to the conclusion that general population respondents who have little experience of disease will likely increase their health state values after being informed about adaptation because they understand that they could cope with the disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21901378     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-011-9994-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  13 in total

Review 1.  Designing a mixed methods study in primary care.

Authors:  John W Creswell; Michael D Fetters; Nataliya V Ivankova
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Valuing health states: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  P Dolan; C Gudex; P Kind; A Williams
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Clustering Rasch results: a novel method for developing rheumatoid arthritis states for use in valuation studies.

Authors:  Helen M McTaggart-Cowan; John E Brazier; Aki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  Should patients have a greater role in valuing health states?

Authors:  John Brazier; Ron Akehurst; Alan Brennan; Paul Dolan; Karl Claxton; Chris McCabe; Mark Sculpher; Aki Tsuchyia
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.561

5.  Understanding the effect of disease adaptation information on general population values for hypothetical health states.

Authors:  Helen McTaggart-Cowan; Aki Tsuchiya; Alicia O'Cathain; John Brazier
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Disability and sunshine: can hedonic predictions be improved by drawing attention to focusing illusions or emotional adaptation?

Authors:  Peter A Ubel; George Loewenstein; Christopher Jepson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2005-06

7.  Incorporating societal concerns for fairness in numerical valuations of health programmes.

Authors:  E Nord; J L Pinto; J Richardson; P Menzel; P Ubel
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  The impact of considering adaptation in health state valuation.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  The effects of gender and age on health related behaviors.

Authors:  Amanda Deeks; Catherine Lombard; Janet Michelmore; Helena Teede
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Considering adaptation in preference elicitations.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.267

View more
  1 in total

1.  Whom should we ask? A systematic literature review of the arguments regarding the most accurate source of information for valuation of health states.

Authors:  Olivia Ernstsson; Mimmi Åström; Gert Helgesson; Kristina Burström
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.147

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.