Literature DB >> 15998183

Disability and sunshine: can hedonic predictions be improved by drawing attention to focusing illusions or emotional adaptation?

Peter A Ubel1, George Loewenstein, Christopher Jepson.   

Abstract

People frequently mispredict the long-term emotional impact of circumstances. The authors examine 2 causes of such mispredictions-a focusing illusion and underappreciation of adaptation. In Experiment 1, the authors found, in 852 adults, that quality of life estimates (for living with disability) were not increased by reducing focusing illusions. In Experiment 2, the authors found, in 698 adults, that people's disability estimates were increased by asking them to reflect on adaptation. In Experiment 3, the authors found, across 312 Midwestern college students, that both approaches reduced the participants' predictions of the life satisfaction of their peers living in southern California. In the case of living in a better climate, the results suggest that attention to either cause influences people's predictions, whereas in the case of chronic disability, the results suggest that it is easier to get people to appreciate adaptation than it is to reduce focusing illusions. (c) 2005 APA

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15998183     DOI: 10.1037/1076-898X.11.2.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl        ISSN: 1076-898X


  22 in total

1.  Beneficent persuasion: techniques and ethical guidelines to improve patients' decisions.

Authors:  J S Swindell; Amy L McGuire; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Thinking Forward: Future-oriented Thinking among Patients with Tobacco-associated Thoracic Diseases and Their Surrogates.

Authors:  Joanna L Hart; Emily Pflug; Vanessa Madden; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 3.  Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer Waljee; Evan P McGlinn; Erika Davis Sears; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Compared to what? A joint evaluation method for assessing quality of life.

Authors:  Heather P Lacey; George Loewenstein; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Using mixed methods research to explore the effect of an adaptation exercise on general population valuations of health states.

Authors:  Helen M McTaggart-Cowan; Alicia O'Cathain; Aki Tsuchiya; John E Brazier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Uncertainty about advance care planning treatment preferences among diverse older adults.

Authors:  Rebecca L Sudore; Dean Schillinger; Sara J Knight; Terri R Fried
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2010

Review 7.  Affective forecasting: an unrecognized challenge in making serious health decisions.

Authors:  Jodi Halpern; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Effect of adaptive abilities on utilities, direct or mediated by mental health?

Authors:  Yvette Peeters; Adelita V Ranchor; Thea P M Vliet Vlieland; Anne M Stiggelbout
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Making good choices: toward a theory of well-being in medicine.

Authors:  Alicia Hall
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2016-10

10.  Inconsistency over time in the preferences of older persons with advanced illness for life-sustaining treatment.

Authors:  Terri R Fried; John O'Leary; Peter Van Ness; Liana Fraenkel
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.