BACKGROUND: Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) is associated with poor driving skills and insight. Increasing insight may improve receptiveness for therapy or driving restrictions. AIM: To evaluate the change in the self-assessment of driving skills (SADS) using a driving simulator. METHODS: Cirrhotic patients and age/education-matched controls underwent MHE testing with inhibitory control (ICT) and the psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES). SADS, a Likert scale from 0 to 10, was administered just before and after a standardized driving simulation comprising testing and navigation tasks. The percentage SADS change from baseline was compared within/between groups. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients (60% men, age 55 years) and 12 controls were included. Controls were significantly better than cirrhotics on cognitive/simulator testing. The baseline SADS was similar between the groups. The baseline patient SADS was only correlated with ICT lures (r = -0.4, P = 0.001). Post-simulation, 60% of patients improved their insight, i.e., reduced SADS (from 8 to 6.5, P = 0.0001) compared to 25% of controls (P = 0.02). The mean percentage SADS reduction was also higher in cirrhotics (18% vs. 8%, P = 0.03). MHE on ICT patients had a significantly higher SADS improvement (P = 0.004) compared to the other patients; no difference was seen in those with/without MHE due to the PHES. The percentage SADS reduction in patients was correlated with getting lost (r = 0.468, P < 0.0001), crashes (P = 0.002), and centerline/road-edge excursions (P = 0.01). There was a significantly higher percentage SADS reduction in cirrhotics who got lost (25%) compared to those who did not get lost (12%) and controls (8%, P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Insight into driving skills in cirrhosis improves after driving simulation and is highest in those with navigation errors and MHE on ICT. Driving simulator-associated insight improvement may be the first step towards the cognitive rehabilitation of driving skills in cirrhosis.
BACKGROUND: Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) is associated with poor driving skills and insight. Increasing insight may improve receptiveness for therapy or driving restrictions. AIM: To evaluate the change in the self-assessment of driving skills (SADS) using a driving simulator. METHODS: Cirrhotic patients and age/education-matched controls underwent MHE testing with inhibitory control (ICT) and the psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES). SADS, a Likert scale from 0 to 10, was administered just before and after a standardized driving simulation comprising testing and navigation tasks. The percentage SADS change from baseline was compared within/between groups. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients (60% men, age 55 years) and 12 controls were included. Controls were significantly better than cirrhotics on cognitive/simulator testing. The baseline SADS was similar between the groups. The baseline patient SADS was only correlated with ICT lures (r = -0.4, P = 0.001). Post-simulation, 60% of patients improved their insight, i.e., reduced SADS (from 8 to 6.5, P = 0.0001) compared to 25% of controls (P = 0.02). The mean percentage SADS reduction was also higher in cirrhotics (18% vs. 8%, P = 0.03). MHE on ICT patients had a significantly higher SADS improvement (P = 0.004) compared to the other patients; no difference was seen in those with/without MHE due to the PHES. The percentage SADS reduction in patients was correlated with getting lost (r = 0.468, P < 0.0001), crashes (P = 0.002), and centerline/road-edge excursions (P = 0.01). There was a significantly higher percentage SADS reduction in cirrhotics who got lost (25%) compared to those who did not get lost (12%) and controls (8%, P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Insight into driving skills in cirrhosis improves after driving simulation and is highest in those with navigation errors and MHE on ICT. Driving simulator-associated insight improvement may be the first step towards the cognitive rehabilitation of driving skills in cirrhosis.
Authors: Peter Ferenci; Alan Lockwood; Kevin Mullen; Ralph Tarter; Karin Weissenborn; Andres T Blei Journal: Hepatology Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Jasmohan S Bajaj; Muhammad Hafeezullah; Raymond G Hoffmann; Rajiv R Varma; Jose Franco; David G Binion; Thomas A Hammeke; Kia Saeian Journal: Hepatology Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Jasmohan S Bajaj; Kia Saeian; Muhammad Hafeezullah; Raymond G Hoffmann; Thomas A Hammeke Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: M Groeneweg; J C Quero; I De Bruijn; I J Hartmann; M L Essink-bot; W C Hop; S W Schalm Journal: Hepatology Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Jasmohan S Bajaj; Melanie B White; Ariel B Unser; Dinesh Ganapathy; Andrew Fagan; Edith A Gavis; Richard K Sterling; Douglas M Heuman; Scott Matherly; Puneet Puri; Arun J Sanyal; Velimir Luketic; Michael Fuchs; Muhammad S Siddiqui; R Todd Stravitz; Binu John; Leroy R Thacker; James B Wade Journal: Metab Brain Dis Date: 2016-06-25 Impact factor: 3.584
Authors: Mette M Lauridsen; Leroy R Thacker; Melanie B White; Ariel Unser; Richard K Sterling; Richard T Stravitz; Scott Matherly; Puneet Puri; Arun J Sanyal; Edith A Gavis; Velimir Luketic; Muhammad S Siddiqui; Douglas M Heuman; Michael Fuchs; Jasmohan S Bajaj Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2015-11-19 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Vishwadeep Ahluwalia; James B Wade; Leroy Thacker; Kenneth A Kraft; Richard K Sterling; R Todd Stravitz; Michael Fuchs; Iliana Bouneva; Puneet Puri; Velimir Luketic; Arun J Sanyal; Hochong Gilles; Douglas M Heuman; Jasmohan S Bajaj Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2013-05-07 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Chathur Acharya; Sara McGeorge; Andrew Fagan; James B Wade; Hannah Lee; Velimir Luketic; Richard K Sterling; Leroy Thacker; Jasmohan S Bajaj Journal: Hepatol Commun Date: 2022-07-17