Synthesis of some oxadiazole derivatives as new anticandidal agents.

In this study, 5-[(pyrimidin-2-ylthio)methyl]-1,3,4-oxadiazole-2(3H)-thione (3) was synthesized via the ring closure reaction of 2-(pyrimidin-2-ylthio)acetohydrazide (2) with carbon disulphide. New oxadiazole derivatives 4a-f were obtained by the nucleophilic substitution reaction of compound 3 with various phenacyl bromides. The chemical structures of the compounds were elucidated by IR, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR and FAB+-MS spectral data and elemental analyses. The newly synthesized derivatives 4a-f were tested in vitro by using a microbroth dilution method against C. albicans (clinical isolate, Osmangazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir, Turkey), C. albicans (ATCC 90028), C. glabrata (clinical isolate, Osmangazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir, Turkey), C. tropicalis (NRRL Y-12968), C. krusei (NRRL Y-7179), C. parapsilosis (NRRL Y- 12696), C. albicans (NRRL Y-12983), C. glabrata (clinical isolate, Anadolu University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Eskişehir, Turkey). Among these compounds, compound 4a was found to be the most potent derivative (MIC = 0.007-0.06 versus ketoconazole: 0.001-0.007 mg/mL) against Candida species, except C. tropicalis and C. krusei when compared with the standard antifungal ketoconazole.

1. Introduction

The incidence of invasive fungal infections, particularly those related to n class="Species">Candida species, has increased worldwide over the past two decades. It is obvious that Candida has emerged as one of the leading causes of nosocomial bloodstream infections. Although there are some antifungal agents currently available, the treatment of invasive fungal infections still remains a challenging problem due to the development of resistance accompanying the widespread use of these drugs. As a consequence of this situation, medicinal chemists have focused on the development of more effective agents for the treatment of invasive fungal infections caused by resistant organisms [1,2,3,4,5].

Oxadiazoles have gained great importance in medicinal chemistry owing to their broad spectrum and metabolic profile [6]. Many studies have confirmed that n class="Chemical">oxadiazole derivatives possess antifungal activity [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Among oxadiazole derivatives, 1,3,4-oxadiazolin-2-thiones have received a great deal of attention in heterocyclic chemistry as versatile intermediates due to the fact that the thiol group on oxadiazole ring undergoes nucleophilic substitution reactions readily [15,16].

Pyrimidine derivatives have been found to possess antin class="Species">candidal activity. Voriconazole, which is an azole derivative bearing pyrimidine group, is widely used as an antifungal agent for the treatment of candidiasis [5,17,18,19]. On the other hand, some researchers have also carried out considerable research for novel antifungal agents bearing thioether moiety. The prominent compounds bearing thioether group are butoconazole and sulconazole, all of which are widely used as antifungal drugs for the treatment of candidiasis [20,21,22].

In the present study, new oxadiazole derivatives bearing two important functional moieties, namely n class="Chemical">pyrimidine and thioether, were synthesized and furthermore, their anticandidal effects were elaborated.

2. Results and Discussion

Initially, 5-[(pyrimidin-2-ylthio)methyl]-1,3,4-oxadiazole-2(3H)-thione (3) was obtained by the ring closure reaction of the n class="Chemical">acid hydrazide 2 with carbon disulphide in the presence of potassium hydroxide. The target compounds 4a–f were synthesized via the nucleophilic substitution reaction of 5-[(pyrimidin-2-ylthio)methyl]-1,3,4-oxadiazole-2(3H)-thione (3) with various phenacyl bromides. These reactions are summarized in Scheme 1 and some properties of the compounds are given in Table 1.

Scheme 1

The synthetic protocol of the compounds (4a–f).

Table 1

Some properties of the compounds (4a–f).

Compound	R	Yield (%)	M.p. (°C)	Molecular formula	Molecular weight
4a	H	75	112-114	C15H12N4O2S2	344
4b	p-Cl	85	106-108	C15H11ClN4O2S2	378,5
4c	p-NO2	95	145-149	C15H11N5O4S2	389
4d	m-NO2	92	79-80	C15H11N5O4S2	389
4e	m-Cl	84	89-90	C15H11ClN4O2S2	378,5
4f	2,4-Cl	88	75-77	C15H10Cl2N4O2S2	413

The structures of the compounds 4a–f were confirmed by IR, 1H-n class="Chemical">NMR, 13C-NMR and FAB-MS spectral data and Elemental analyses. In the IR spectra of all compounds 4a–f, all derivatives have a strong, characteristic band in the region 1685–1675 cm−1 due to the C=O stretching vibration. The bands due to C=C and C=N stretching vibrations are observed in the region 1620–1400 cm−1.

In the 1H n class="Chemical">NMR spectra of all compounds 4a–f, the signals due to the -S-CH2- protons directly attached to oxadiazole ring and carbonyl group appeared at 4.67–4.72 ppm and 4.91–5.17 ppm, respectively. The pyrimidine ring protons were observed in the region 7.25–8.72 ppm. The other aromatic protons were observed at expected regions.

In their 13C-n class="Chemical">NMR spectra of 4a–f, the signals due to the carbonyl carbons were observed at 191–193 ppm. The oxadiazole ring carbons appeared at 163.61–165.77 ppm. The aromatic carbons were observed in the expected regions.

In the mass spectra of all compounds 4a–f, the M+1 peak was observed. All compounds gave satisfactory elemental analysis.

All compounds were tested in vitro against C. albicans (clinical isolate, Osmangazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir, n class="Species">Turkey), C. albicans (ATCC 90028), C. glabrata (clinical isolate, Osmangazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir, Turkey), C. tropicalis (NRRL Y-12968), C. krusei (NRRL Y-7179), C. parapsilosis (NRRL Y- 12696), C. albicans (NRRL Y-12983), C. glabrata (clinical isolate, Anadolu University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Eskişehir, Turkey) and compared with ketoconazole (Table 2).

Table 2

Anticandidal activities of novel compounds (4a–f) as MIC values (mg/mL).

	4a	4b	4c	4d	4e	4f	Ref.
A	0.015	0.015	0.06	0.125	0.015	0.03	0.007
B	0.03	0.03	0.03	0.06	0.03	0.06	0.007
C	0.03	0.125	0.06	0.06	0.125	0.06	0.003
D	0.015	0.015	0.015	0.06	0.06	0.06	0.001
E	0.007	0.03	0.015	0.125	0.03	0.015	0.001
F	0.06	0.06	0.03	0.06	0.06	0.06	0.001
G	0.06	0.06	0.06	0.125	0.06	0.06	0.001
H	0.06	0.03	0.03	0.06	0.03	0.015	0.001

A: C. albicans (clinical isolate, Osmangazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir, Turkey), B: C. albicans (ATCC 90028), C: C. albicans (NRRL Y-12983), D: C. glabrata (clinical isolate, Osmangazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir, Turkey), E: C. glabrata (clinical isolate, Anadolu University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Eskişehir, Turkey), F: C. krusei (NRRL Y-7179), G: C. parapsilosis (NRRL Y- 12696), H: C. tropicalis (NRRL Y-12968), Ref.:Ketoconazole.

A: C. albicans (clinical isolate, Osmangazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir, n class="Species">Turkey), B: C. albicans (ATCC 90028), C: C. albicans (NRRL Y-12983), D: C. glabrata (clinical isolate, Osmangazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir, Turkey), E: C. glabrata (clinical isolate, Anadolu University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Eskişehir, Turkey), F: C. krusei (NRRL Y-7179), G: C. parapsilosis (NRRL Y- 12696), H: C. tropicalis (NRRL Y-12968), Ref.:Ketoconazole.

The biological results indicate that C. albicans (clinical isolate) is the most susceptible fungus to compounds 4a, 4b and 4e. These compounds exhibit the strongest inhibitory activity against n class="Species">C. albicans (clinical isolate) with a MIC value of 0.015 mg/mL, when compared with the standard antifungal ketoconazole, which exhibits inhibitory activity with a MIC value of 0.007 mg/mL. This outcome confirms that phenyl and chlorophenyl groups may have a considerable influence on antifungal activity against the tested clinical C. albicans isolate. It can be attributed to + π effect of phenyl and chlorophenyl groups. Compounds 4c and 4d exhibit lower inhibitory activity against C. albicans (clinical isolate) which may be due to—π effect of the nitro substituent.

The standard strain C. albicans (ATCC 90028) showed an inhibition range with MIC values of 0.03–0.06 mg/mL of the tested compounds 4a–f suggesting moderate inhibitory activity compared to the clinical isolate versus n class="Chemical">ketoconazole. The other tested C. albicans strain (NRRL Y-12983) was less susceptible to the tested compounds, with the MIC = 0.03–0.125 mg/mL.

The tested compounds 4a–c showed strong inhibitory activity (0.03 mg/mL) against and C. glabrata (clinical isolate, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, n class="Species">Turkey), and relatively good inhibition was also observed in compounds 4d–f with an inhibition value of 0.06 mg/mL. However, compound 4a exhibits the most potent inhibitory activity among the tested substances against C. glabrata (clinical isolate, Anadolu University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Eskişehir, Turkey) with a MIC value of 0.007 mg/mL, whereas ketoconazole exhibits inhibitory activity with a MIC value of 0.001 mg/mL. The Candida species was susceptible to compounds 4b–f with MIC values of 0.015–0.125 mg/mL.

Compound 4c is the most potent (MIC = 0.03 mg/mL) derivative against C. krusei (n class="Species">NRRL Y-7179). It is obvious that p-nitro group has an important impact on antifungal activity against C. krusei. Other tested compounds showed an inhibition effect with MIC 0.06 mg/mL.

The standard strain C. parapsilosis (n class="Chemical">NRRL Y- 12696) was inhibited by all tested compounds relatively well, with an MIC value of 0.06 mg/mL, except compound 4d with an MIC value of 0.125 mg/mL, whereas ketoconazole showed an inhibition concentration of 0.001 mg/mL.

Compound 4f exhibits the highest antifungal activity (MIC 0.015 mg/mL) against C. tropicalis (n class="Species">NRRL Y-12968) compared to ketoconazole (MIC 0.001 mg/mL) among the tested compounds against this pathogen. It is apparent that there is a positive correlation between antifungal activity against C. tropicalis and 2,4-dichlorophenyl substituent.

3. Experimental

3.1. General

All reagents were used as purchased from commercial suppliers without further purification. Melting points were determined on an Electrothermal 9100 digital melting point apparatus and were uncorrected (Electrothermal, Essex, UK). Spectroscopic data were recorded on the following instruments: IR, Shimadzu 435 IR spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) 1H-n class="Chemical">NMR (400 MHz) and 13C-NMR (100 MHz) Bruker (Avance DRX-400) NMR spectrometer (Bruker Bioscience, Billerica, MA, USA) in DMSO-d6 using TMS as internal standard; MS-FAB, VG Quattro mass spectrometer (Fisons Instruments Vertriebs GmbH, Mainz, Germany). Elemental analyses were performed on a Perkin Elmer EAL 240 elemental analyser (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA).

3.2. General Procedure for Synthesis of the Compounds

Ethyl 2-(pyrimidin-2-ylthio)acetate (1). A mixture of n class="Chemical">2-mercaptopyrimidine (0.05 mol) and ethyl chloroacetate (0.05 mol) in the presence of potassium carbonate (0.05 mol) in acetone (100 mL) was refluxed for 10 h. The reaction mixture was cooled, filtered and the crude product was solved in water and then extracted with ether [17].

2-(Pyrimidin-2-ylthio)acetohydrazide (2). A mixture of the n class="Chemical">ester (1, 0.05 mol) and hydrazine hydrate (0.1 mol) in ethanol (100 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 3 hours and then filtered [17].

5-[(pyrimidin-2-ylthio)methyl]-1,3,4-oxadiazole-2(3H)-thione (3). A mixture of the n class="Chemical">hydrazide (2) (0.01 mol) and carbon disulfide (10 mL) in the presence of potassium hydroxide (0.01 mol) in ethanol (15 mL) was refluxed for 10 h. The solution was cooled and acidified to pH 5-6 with hydrochloric acid solution and crystallized from ethanol [17].

2-[5-[(Pyrimidin-2-ylthio)methyl] -1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-ylthio]acetophenone derivatives 4a–f. n class="Chemical">5-[(Pyrimidin-2-ylthio)methyl]-1,3,4-oxadiazole-2(3H)-thione (3) (0.01 mol) and appropriate phenacyl bromide (0.01 mol) in acetone (15 mL) were stirred at room temperature for 8 hours and filtered. The residue was crystallized from ethanol.

2-[5-[(Pyrimidin-2-ylthio)methyl] -1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-ylthio]acetophenone (4a). IR (KBr) νmax (cm−1): 3057 (aromatic C-H), 1683 (C=O), 1605, 1551, 1440 (C=n class="Chemical">N and C=C). 1H-NMR: 4.68 (2H, s, CH-oxadiazole), 5.08 (2H, s, CH-CO), 7.25 (1H, dd, pyrimidine), 7.56–7.60 (2H, dd, phenyl), 7.69 (1H, dd, phenyl), 8.01–8.03 (2H, d, phenyl), 8.65–8.66 (2H, d, pyrimidine); 13C-NMR: 31.17 (CH2, CH-oxadiazole), 40.93 (CH2, CH-CO), 118.41 (CH, pyrimidine), 128.89 (2CH, phenyl), 129.36 (2CH, phenyl), 134.44 (CH, phenyl), 135.45 (C, phenyl), 158.51 (CH, pyrimidine), 158.61 (CH, pyrimidine), 163.88 (C, oxadiazole), 165.64 (C, oxadiazole), 169.11 (C, pyrimidine), 192.75 (C, C=O); Anal. For C15H12N4O2S2 calculated: C, 52.31; H, 3.51; N, 16.27; found: C, 52.30; H, 3.52; N, 16.25; MS (FAB) [M+1]+: m/z 345.

2-[5-[(Pyrimidin-2-ylthio)methyl] -1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-ylthio]-4′-chloroacetophenone (4b). IR (KBr) νmax (cm−1): 3066 (aromatic C-H), 1685 (C=O), 1615, 1560, 1445 (C=N and C=C). n class="Chemical">1H-NMR: 4.67 (2H, s, CH-oxadiazole), 5.06 (2H, s, CH-CO), 7.25 (1H, dd, pyrimidine), 7.61–7.67 (2H, d, 4-chlorophenyl), 7.99–8.05 (2H, d, 4-chlorophenyl), 8.65–8.71 (2H, d, pyrimidine); 13C-NMR: 31.10 (CH2, CH-oxadiazole), 40.80 (CH2, CH-CO), 118.40 (CH, pyrimidine), 129.48 (2CH, 4-chlorophenyl), 130.81 (2CH, 4-chlorophenyl), 134.15 (C, 4-chlorophenyl), 139.39 (C, 4-chlorophenyl), 158.51 (2CH, pyrimidine), 163.88 (C, oxadiazole), 165.68 (C, oxadiazole), 169.90 (C, pyrimidine), 191.93 (C, C=O); Anal. For C15H11ClN4O2S2 calculated: C, 47.55; H, 2.93; N, 14.79; found: C, 47.52; H, 2.90; N, 14.81; MS (FAB) [M+1]+: m/z 379.

2-[5-[(Pyrimidin-2-ylthio)methyl] -1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-ylthio]-4′-nitroacetophenone (4c). IR (KBr) νmax (cm−1): 3067 (aromatic C-H), 1685 (C=O), 1604, 1554, 1442 (C=n class="Chemical">N and C=C). 1H-NMR: 4.72 (2H, s, CH-oxadiazole), 5.13 (2H, s, CH-CO), 7.25 (1H, dd, pyrimidine), 8.15–8.26 (2H, d, 4-nitrophenyl), 8.28–8.42 (2H, d, 4-nitrophenyl), 8.60–8.71 (2H, d, pyrimidine); 13C-NMR: 33.51 (CH2, CH-oxadiazole), 41.05 (CH2, CH-CO), 118.41 (CH, pyrimidine), 124.41 (2CH, 4-nitrophenyl), 130.34 (2CH, 4-nitrophenyl), 140.10 (C, 4-nitrophenyl), 150.75 (C, 4-nitrophenyl), 158.52 (CH, pyrimidine), 158.61 (CH, pyrimidine), 163.61 (C, oxadiazole), 165.77 (C, oxadiazole), 169.09 (C, pyrimidine), 192.29 (C, C=O); Anal. For C15H11N5O4S2 calculated: C, 46.27; H, 2.85; N, 17.98; found: C, 46.30; H, 2.82; N, 18.00; MS (FAB) [M+1]+: m/z 390.

2-[5-[(Pyrimidin-2-ylthio)methyl] -1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-ylthio]-3′-nitroacetophenone (4d). IR (KBr) νmax (cm−1): 3067 (aromatic C-H), 1684 (C=O), 1605, 1555, 1440 (C=n class="Chemical">N and C=C). 1H-NMR: 4.67 (2H, s, CH-oxadiazole), 5.17 (2H, s, CH-CO), 7.26 (1H, dd, pyrimidine), 7.87–7.91 (1H, dd, 3-nitrophenyl), 8.43–8.54 (2H, d, 3-nitrophenyl), 8.59–8.61 (1H, s, 3-nitrophenyl), 8.63–8.72 (2H, d, pyrimidine); 13C-NMR: 31.15 (CH2, CH-oxadiazole), 40.82 (CH2, CH-CO), 118.39 (CH, pyrimidine), 123.26 (CH, 3-nitrophenyl), 128.55 (CH, 3-nitrophenyl), 131.22 (CH, 3-nitrophenyl), 135.06 (CH, 3-nitrophenyl), 136.66 (C, 3-nitrophenyl), 148.52 (C, 3-nitrophenyl), 158.51 (CH, pyrimidine), 158.61 (CH, pyrimidine), 163.61 (C, oxadiazole), 165.77 (C, oxadiazole), 169.10 (C, pyrimidine), 191.72 (C, C=O); Anal. For C15H11N5O4S2 calculated: C, 46.27; H, 2.85; N, 17.98; found: C, 46.28; H, 2.86; N, 17.99; MS (FAB) [M+1]+: m/z 390.

2-[5-[(Pyrimidin-2-ylthio)methyl] -1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-ylthio]-3′-chloroacetophenone (4e). IR (KBr) νmax (cm−1): 3065 (aromatic C-H), 1685 (C=O), 1614, 1555, 1445 (C=N and C=C). n class="Chemical">1H-NMR: 4.67 (2H, s, CH-oxadiazole), 5.07 (2H, s, CH-CO), 7.25 (1H, dd, pyrimidine), 7.59-7.66 (1H, dd, 3-chlorophenyl), 7.68-7.79 (1H, d, 3-chlorophenyl), 7.84-7.85 (1H, d, 3-chlorophenyl), 7.92-8.04 (1H, s, 3-chlorophenyl), 8.60-8.71 (2H, d, pyrimidine); 13C-NMR: 31.20 (CH2, CH-oxadiazole), 40.77 (CH2, CH-CO), 118.39 (CH, pyrimidine), 127.53 (CH, 3-chlorophenyl), 128.58 (CH, 3-chlorophenyl), 129.21 (CH, 3-chlorophenyl), 131.35 (CH, 3-chlorophenyl), 134.10 (C, 3-chlorophenyl), 137.27 (C, 3-chlorophenyl), 158.50 (CH, pyrimidine), 158.61 (CH, pyrimidine), 163.70 (C, oxadiazole), 165.71 (C, oxadiazole), 169.00 (C, pyrimidine), 191.93 (C, C=O); Anal. For C15H11ClN4O2S2 calculated: C, 47.55; H, 2.93; N, 14.79; found: C, 47.52; H, 2.90; N, 14.80; MS (FAB) [M+1]+: m/z 379.

2-[5-[(Pyrimidin-2-ylthio)methyl] -1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-ylthio]-2′,4′-dichloroacetophenone (4f). IR (KBr) νmax (cm−1): 3065 (aromatic C-H), 1685 (C=O), 1620, 1552, 1415 (C=N and C=C). n class="Chemical">1H-NMR: 4.68 (2H, s, CH-oxadiazole), 4.91 (2H, s, CH-CO), 7.27 (1H, dd, pyrimidine), 7.53–7.64 (2H, 2,4-dichlorophenyl), 7.73–7.88 (1H, d, 2,4-dichlorophenyl), 8.61–8.70 (2H, d, pyrimidine); 13C-NMR: 33.58 (CH2, CH-oxadiazole), 42.71 (CH2, CH-CO), 118.53 (CH, pyrimidine), 128.26 (CH, 2,4-dichlorophenyl), 128.55 (CH, 2,4-dichlorophenyl), 130.93 (C, 2,4-dichlorophenyl), 131.51 (CH, 2,4-dichlorophenyl), 135.23 (C, 2,4-dichlorophenyl), 137.59 (C, 2,4-dichlorophenyl), 158.54 (CH, pyrimidine), 158.61 (CH, pyrimidine), 163.47 (C, oxadiazole), 165.77 (C, oxadiazole), 169.11 (C, pyrimidine), 193.73 (C, C=O); Anal. For C15H10Cl2N4O2S2 calculated: C, 43.59; H, 2.44; N, 13.56; found: C, 43.60; H, 2.45; N, 13.53; MS (FAB) [M+1]+: m/z 414.

3.3. Microbiology

3.3.1. Anticandidal Evaluation

A modified microbroth dilution method was carried out according to the procedure [23,24]. The compounds 4a–f were tested in vitro against C. albicans (clinical isolate, Osmangazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir, n class="Species">Turkey), C. albicans (ATCC 90028), C. albicans (NRRL Y-12983), C. glabrata (clinical isolate, Osmangazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir, Turkey),C. glabrata (clinical isolate, Anadolu University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Eskişehir, Turkey), C. krusei (NRRL Y-7179), C. parapsilosis (NRRL Y- 12696), C. tropicalis (NRRL Y-12968).

Microorganisms were stored in 15% glycerol containing micro-test tubes at −86 °C. All n class="Species">Candida strains were inoculated on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) prior to the experiments at 37 °C. After sufficient growth, Candida spp. were then transferred to Mueller Hinton Broth (MHB) for further incubation under the same conditions for another 24 h.

3.3.2. Microbroth Dilution Assay

The test compounds and the antifungal standard were first dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (n class="Chemical">DMSO) which was used to prepare the stock solutions at an initial concentration of 2 mg/mL. Serial dilution series were prepared in MHB (10 mL) with an equal amount of the test samples. The last row was filled only with water as growth control for the microorganism. Overnight grown microorganism suspensions were first diluted in double strength MHB and standardized to 1 × 108 CFU/mL (using McFarland No: 0.5) under sterile conditions. Then each microorganism suspension was pippetted into each well and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Ketoconazole was used as a standard antifungal agent against Candida spp. Sterile distilled water and medium served as a positive growth control. The first well without turbidity was assigned as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC, in mg/mL).

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the syntheses of new oxadiazole derivatives were described, which were also tested in vitro against various clinical and standard n class="Species">Candida species for their antifungal effects. 5-[(Pyrimidin-2-ylthio)methyl]-1,3,4-oxadiazole-2(3H)-thione (3) was obtained via the ring closure reaction of the acid hydrazide 2 with carbon disulphide. New oxadiazole derivatives were prepared by the nucleophilic substitution reaction of compound 3 with appropriate phenacyl bromides. Among these compounds, the non-substituted compound 4a is the most potent derivative (MIC: 0.007–0.06 mg/mL) against Candida species except C. tropicalis and C. krusei.

Within the tested yeasts, n class="Species">C. albicans (clinical isolate) seems to be the most susceptible strain to compounds 4a, 4b and 4e. These compounds exhibit inhibitory activity with a MIC value of 0.015 mg/mL, whereas ketoconazole exhibits inhibitory activity with a MIC value of 0.007 mg/mL. This could result from increased lipophilicity associated with phenyl and chlorophenyl groups. Compound 4f exhibits the highest antifungal activity against C. tropicalis (NRRL Y-12968). It is clear that the 2,4-dichlorophenyl substituent has an important impact on antifungal activity against C. tropicalis. Compound 4c is the most effective derivative against C. krusei (NRRL Y-7179). It is apparent that the p-nitro group may have a considerable influence on antifungal activity against this species.