Literature DB >> 21900562

Depth-dependent temporal response properties in core auditory cortex.

G Björn Christianson1, Maneesh Sahani, Jennifer F Linden.   

Abstract

The computational role of cortical layers within auditory cortex has proven difficult to establish. One hypothesis is that interlaminar cortical processing might be dedicated to analyzing temporal properties of sounds; if so, then there should be systematic depth-dependent changes in cortical sensitivity to the temporal context in which a stimulus occurs. We recorded neural responses simultaneously across cortical depth in primary auditory cortex and anterior auditory field of CBA/Ca mice, and found systematic depth dependencies in responses to second-and-later noise bursts in slow (1-10 bursts/s) trains of noise bursts. At all depths, responses to noise bursts within a train usually decreased with increasing train rate; however, the rolloff with increasing train rate occurred at faster rates in more superficial layers. Moreover, in some recordings from mid-to-superficial layers, responses to noise bursts within a 3-4 bursts/s train were stronger than responses to noise bursts in slower trains. This non-monotonicity with train rate was especially pronounced in more superficial layers of the anterior auditory field, where responses to noise bursts within the context of a slow train were sometimes even stronger than responses to the noise burst at train onset. These findings may reflect depth dependence in suppression and recovery of cortical activity following a stimulus, which we suggest could arise from laminar differences in synaptic depression at feedforward and recurrent synapses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21900562      PMCID: PMC3673482          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2863-11.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  52 in total

1.  Cortical columnar processing in the rat whisker-to-barrel system.

Authors:  J C Brumberg; D J Pinto; D J Simons
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Frequency-selective augmenting responses by short-term synaptic depression in cat neocortex.

Authors:  Arthur R Houweling; Maxim Bazhenov; Igor Timofeev; François Grenier; Mircea Steriade; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Stimulus induced and spontaneous rhythmic firing of single units in cat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  J J Eggermont
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Synaptic mechanisms of forward suppression in rat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Michael Wehr; Anthony M Zador
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Rate and synchronization measures of periodicity coding in cat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  J J Eggermont
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Repetition rate and signal level effects on neuronal responses to brief tone pulses in cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  D P Phillips; S E Hall; J L Hollett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Functional architecture in cat primary auditory cortex: columnar organization and organization according to depth.

Authors:  M Abeles; M H Goldstein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Synchrony between single-unit activity and local field potentials in relation to periodicity coding in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  J J Eggermont; G M Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Spectrotemporal structure of receptive fields in areas AI and AAF of mouse auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jennifer F Linden; Robert C Liu; Maneesh Sahani; Christoph E Schreiner; Michael M Merzenich
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-06-18       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Processing of sounds by population spikes in a model of primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Alex Loebel; Israel Nelken; Misha Tsodyks
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  20 in total

1.  Complexity of frequency receptive fields predicts tonotopic variability across species.

Authors:  Quentin Gaucher; Mariangela Panniello; Aleksandar Z Ivanov; Johannes C Dahmen; Andrew J King; Kerry Mm Walker
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  A guide to in vivo single-unit recording from optogenetically identified cortical inhibitory interneurons.

Authors:  Alexandra K Moore; Michael Wehr
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  A Late Critical Period for Frequency Modulated Sweeps in the Mouse Auditory System.

Authors:  Stitipragyan Bhumika; Mari Nakamura; Patricia Valerio; Magdalena Solyga; Henrik Lindén; Tania R Barkat
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Rapid Rebalancing of Excitation and Inhibition by Cortical Circuitry.

Authors:  Alexandra K Moore; Aldis P Weible; Timothy S Balmer; Laurence O Trussell; Michael Wehr
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Robustness of cortical topography across fields, laminae, anesthetic states, and neurophysiological signal types.

Authors:  Wei Guo; Anna R Chambers; Keith N Darrow; Kenneth E Hancock; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Detection and identification of speech sounds using cortical activity patterns.

Authors:  T M Centanni; A M Sloan; A C Reed; C T Engineer; R L Rennaker; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Diverse effects of stimulus history in waking mouse auditory cortex.

Authors:  Elizabeth A K Phillips; Christoph E Schreiner; Andrea R Hasenstaub
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Spectral breadth and laminar distribution of thalamocortical inputs to A1.

Authors:  Irakli Intskirveli; Anar Joshi; Bianca Julieta Vizcarra-Chacón; Raju Metherate
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Synaptic Recruitment Enhances Gap Termination Responses in Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Bshara Awwad; Maciej M Jankowski; Israel Nelken
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  A Cortico-Collicular Amplification Mechanism for Gap Detection.

Authors:  Aldis P Weible; Iryna Yavorska; Michael Wehr
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.