Literature DB >> 21899557

Responses to deviants are modulated by subthreshold variability of the standard.

Luba Daikhin1, Merav Ahissar.   

Abstract

Auditory mechanisms automatically detect both basic features of sounds and the rules governing their presentation. In the oddball paradigm, the auditory system detects the sameness (or no-variability) rule when the same reference tone is consistently repeated. We used two oddball protocols, the classical one with a fixed reference and a modified one with a jittered reference, to determine whether the auditory system can detect subthreshold violations of sameness. We found that the response to the repeated standard was not modified by the small jitter. However, the response to the frequency oddball was smaller under the jittered protocol, indicating hypersensitivity to sameness. The sensitivity to jitter was largest when the oddball deviated by 8%, was smaller for 40%, and disappeared at 100% deviation, indicating that sensitivity to sameness is context dependent; namely, it is scaled with respect to the overall range of stimuli.
Copyright © 2011 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21899557      PMCID: PMC3240736          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01274.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  61 in total

1.  Plastic changes in the auditory cortex induced by intensive frequency discrimination training.

Authors:  H Menning; L E Roberts; C Pantev
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-03-20       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Preattentive memory-based comparison of sound intensity.

Authors:  Thomas Jacobsen; Thorsten Horenkamp; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Prefrontal cortex involvement in preattentive auditory deviance detection: neuroimaging and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Christian F Doeller; Bertram Opitz; Axel Mecklinger; Christoph Krick; Wolfgang Reith; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Mismatch negativity to pitch change: varied stimulus proportions in controlling effects of neural refractoriness on human auditory event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Thomas Jacobsen; Erich Schröger; Thorsten Horenkamp; István Winkler
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Preattentive auditory context effects.

Authors:  István Winkler; Elyse Sussman; Mari Tervaniemi; János Horváth; Walter Ritter; Risto Näätänen
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Frequency discrimination at different frequency levels as indexed by electrophysiological and behavioral measures.

Authors:  Nikolai Novitski; Mari Tervaniemi; Minna Huotilainen; Risto Näätänen
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-06

7.  Test-retest stability of the magnetic mismatch response (MMNm).

Authors:  Mari Tervaniemi; Janne Sinkkonen; Juha Virtanen; Jari Kallio; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Oili Salonen; Risto Näätänen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Brainstem timing: implications for cortical processing and literacy.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Trent Nicol; Steven G Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Human posterior auditory cortex gates novel sounds to consciousness.

Authors:  Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Jyrki Ahveninen; Giorgio Bonmassar; Anders M Dale; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Sari Levänen; Fa-Hsuan Lin; Patrick May; Jennifer Melcher; Steven Stufflebeam; Hannu Tiitinen; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Mismatch negativity potentials and cognitive impairment in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Torsten Baldeweg; Anthony Klugman; John Gruzelier; Steven R Hirsch
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Towards a theory of individual differences in statistical learning.

Authors:  Noam Siegelman; Louisa Bogaerts; Morten H Christiansen; Ram Frost
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Rhythmicity and cross-modal temporal cues facilitate detection.

Authors:  Sanne ten Oever; Charles E Schroeder; David Poeppel; Nienke van Atteveldt; Elana Zion-Golumbic
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 3.  Predictability effects in auditory scene analysis: a review.

Authors:  Alexandra Bendixen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Enhanced deviant responses in patterned relative to random sound sequences.

Authors:  Rosy Southwell; Maria Chait
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Outlier responses reflect sensitivity to statistical structure in the human brain.

Authors:  Marta I Garrido; Maneesh Sahani; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Implicit learning of predictable sound sequences modulates human brain responses at different levels of the auditory hierarchy.

Authors:  Françoise Lecaignard; Olivier Bertrand; Gérard Gimenez; Jérémie Mattout; Anne Caclin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Neural Encoding of Auditory Statistics.

Authors:  Benjamin Skerritt-Davis; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 6.167

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.