Courtney Beard1, Risa B Weisberg, Nader Amir. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA. Courtney_Beard@brown.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) is a promising treatment for Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD). However, previous randomized trials have not systematically examined the combination of CBM for attention (CBM-A) and interpretation (CBM-I) or the credibility and acceptability of these protocols. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial (N = 32) to examine the efficacy of a CBM treatment called Attention and Interpretation Modification (AIM) for SAD. AIM comprised eight, twice weekly computer sessions with no therapist contact. During AIM, participants (1) completed a dot probe task in which probes always followed neutral faces when paired with a disgust face, thereby directing attention away from threat and (2) completed a word-sentence association task in which they received positive feedback for making benign interpretations of word-sentence pairs and negative feedback for making negative interpretations. We also assessed participants' perceived credibility of and satisfaction with AIM. RESULTS: Participants receiving AIM reported significantly reduced self-reported (Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale) symptoms of social anxiety relative to the placebo. These gains were also evident on a behavioral measure (performance on an impromptu speech). AIM met our benchmarks for credibility and acceptability in this community sample, although credibility ratings were modest. Participants reported that CBM-I was more helpful than CBM-A. CONCLUSIONS: A combined CBM treatment produced medium-to-large effects on social anxiety. Participants rated AIM as moderately credibly and acceptable. Should these findings be replicated in larger samples, AIM has the potential to be a widely accessible and efficacious treatment for SAD.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) is a promising treatment for Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD). However, previous randomized trials have not systematically examined the combination of CBM for attention (CBM-A) and interpretation (CBM-I) or the credibility and acceptability of these protocols. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial (N = 32) to examine the efficacy of a CBM treatment called Attention and Interpretation Modification (AIM) for SAD. AIM comprised eight, twice weekly computer sessions with no therapist contact. During AIM, participants (1) completed a dot probe task in which probes always followed neutral faces when paired with a disgust face, thereby directing attention away from threat and (2) completed a word-sentence association task in which they received positive feedback for making benign interpretations of word-sentence pairs and negative feedback for making negative interpretations. We also assessed participants' perceived credibility of and satisfaction with AIM. RESULTS:Participants receiving AIM reported significantly reduced self-reported (Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale) symptoms of social anxiety relative to the placebo. These gains were also evident on a behavioral measure (performance on an impromptu speech). AIM met our benchmarks for credibility and acceptability in this community sample, although credibility ratings were modest. Participants reported that CBM-I was more helpful than CBM-A. CONCLUSIONS: A combined CBM treatment produced medium-to-large effects on social anxiety. Participants rated AIM as moderately credibly and acceptable. Should these findings be replicated in larger samples, AIM has the potential to be a widely accessible and efficacious treatment for SAD.
Authors: Douglas S Mennin; David M Fresco; Richard G Heimberg; Franklin R Schneier; Sharon O Davies; Michael R Liebowitz Journal: J Anxiety Disord Date: 2002
Authors: Nina K Rytwinski; David M Fresco; Richard G Heimberg; Meredith E Coles; Michael R Liebowitz; Shadha Cissell; Murray B Stein; Stefan G Hofmann Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2009 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Nader Amir; Courtney Beard; Charles T Taylor; Heide Klumpp; Jason Elias; Michelle Burns; Xi Chen Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2009-10
Authors: Wendy G Lichtenthal; Geoffrey W Corner; Elizabeth T Slivjak; Kailey E Roberts; Yuelin Li; William Breitbart; Stephanie Lacey; Malwina Tuman; Katherine N DuHamel; Victoria S Blinder; Courtney Beard Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-01-05 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Courtney Beard; Andrew D Peckham; Margaret L Griffin; Roger D Weiss; Nadine Taghian; R Kathryn McHugh Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Jennie M Kuckertz; Casey A Schofield; Elise M Clerkin; Jennifer Primack; Hannah Boettcher; Risa B Weisberg; Nader Amir; Courtney Beard Journal: Behav Cogn Psychother Date: 2018-05-06
Authors: Kirsten H Dillon; Alyssa M Medenblik; Tiffany M Mosher; Eric B Elbogen; Leslie A Morland; Jean C Beckham Journal: J Trauma Stress Date: 2020-06-09