Literature DB >> 21898099

Use of micro-CT-based finite element analysis to accurately quantify peri-implant bone strains: a validation in rat tibiae.

Antonia Torcasio1, Xiaolei Zhang, Hans Van Oosterwyck, Joke Duyck, G Harry van Lenthe.   

Abstract

Although research has been addressed at investigating the effect of specific loading regimes on bone response around the implant, a precise quantitative understanding of the local mechanical response close to the implant site is still lacking. This study was aimed at validating micro-CT-based finite element (μFE) models to assess tissue strains after implant placement in a rat tibia. Small implants were inserted at the medio-proximal site of 8 rat tibiae. The limbs were subjected to axial compression loading; strain close to the implant was measured by means of strain gauges. Specimen-specific μFE models were created and analyzed. For each specimen, 4 different models were created corresponding to different representations of the bone-implant interface: bone and implant were assumed fully osseointegrated (A); a low stiffness interface zone was assumed with thickness of 40 μm (B), 80 μm (C), and 160 μm (D). In all cases, measured and computational strains correlated highly (R (2) = 0.95, 0.92, 0.93, and 0.95 in A, B, C, and D, respectively). The averaged calculated strains were 1.69, 1.34, and 1.15 times higher than the measured strains for A, B, and C, respectively, and lower than the experimental strains for D (factor = 0.91). In conclusion, we demonstrated that specimen-specific FE analyses provide accurate estimates of peri-implant bone strains in the rat tibia loading model. Further investigations of the bone-implant interface are needed to quantify implant osseointegration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21898099     DOI: 10.1007/s10237-011-0347-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol        ISSN: 1617-7940


  7 in total

1.  In vivo assessment of the effect of controlled high- and low-frequency mechanical loading on peri-implant bone healing.

Authors:  Xiaolei Zhang; Katleen Vandamme; Antonia Torcasio; Toru Ogawa; G Harry van Lenthe; Ignace Naert; Joke Duyck
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Micro-CT-Based Bone Microarchitecture Analysis of the Murine Skull.

Authors:  Jenny Tan; Agatha Labrinidis; Ruth Williams; Mustafa Mian; Peter J Anderson; Sarbin Ranjitkar
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  Enhancement of implant osseointegration by high-frequency low-magnitude loading.

Authors:  Xiaolei Zhang; Antonia Torcasio; Katleen Vandamme; Toru Ogawa; G Harry van Lenthe; Ignace Naert; Joke Duyck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Influence of Trabecular Bone on Peri-Implant Stress and Strain Based on Micro-CT Finite Element Modeling of Beagle Dog.

Authors:  Sheng-Hui Liao; Xing-Hao Zhu; Jing Xie; Vikesh Kumar Sohodeb; Xi Ding
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  The effect of cement augmentation on pedicle screw fixation under various load cases : results from a combined experimental, micro-CT, and micro-finite element analysis.

Authors:  Yan Chevalier; Maiko Matsuura; Sven Krüger; Hannes Traxler; Christoph Fleege; Michael Rauschmann; Christoph Schilling
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 5.853

6.  Biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported, 3-unit, fixed CAD/CAM prostheses in the posterior mandible.

Authors:  Lana Zupancic Cepic; Martin Frank; Andreas Reisinger; Dieter Pahr; Werner Zechner; Andreas Schedle
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-02-11

Review 7.  Finite Element Analysis of Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Dominic Mischler; Hwabok Wee; J Spence Reid; Peter Varga
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.163

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.